605.04091
Standards of conduct for members and managers.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
605.04091 Standards of conduct for members and managers.—
(1) Each manager of a manager-managed limited liability company and member of a member-managed limited liability company owes fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the limited liability company and members of the limited liability company.
(2) The duty of loyalty includes:
(a) Accounting to the limited liability company and holding as trustee for it any property, profit, or benefit derived by the manager or member, as applicable:
1. In the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs;
2. From the use by the member or manager of the company’s property; or
3. From the appropriation of a company opportunity;
(b) Refraining from dealing with the company in the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs as, or on behalf of, a person having an interest adverse to the company, except to the extent that a transaction satisfies the requirements of s. 605.04092; and
(c) Refraining from competing with the company in the conduct of the company’s activities and affairs before the dissolution of the company.
(3) The duty of care in the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs is to refrain from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, willful or intentional misconduct, or a knowing violation of law.
(4) A manager of a manager-managed limited liability company and a member of a member-managed limited liability company shall discharge their duties and obligations under this chapter or under the operating agreement and exercise any rights consistently with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing.
(5) A manager of a manager-managed limited liability company or a member of a member-managed limited liability company does not violate a duty or obligation under this chapter or under the operating agreement solely because the manager’s or member’s conduct furthers the manager’s or member’s own interest.
(6) In discharging his, her, or its duties, a manager of a manager-managed limited liability company or a member of a member-managed limited liability company is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by any of the following:
(a) One or more members or employees of the limited liability company whom the manager or member reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented.
(b) Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the manager or member reasonably believes are within the persons’ professional or expert competence.
(c) A committee of managers or members of which the affected manager or member is not a participant, if the manager or member reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.
(7) A manager or member, as applicable, is not acting in good faith if the manager or member has knowledge concerning the matter in question which makes reliance otherwise authorized under subsection (6) unwarranted.
(8) In discharging his, her, or its duties, a manager of a manager-managed limited liability company or member of a member-managed limited liability company may consider factors that the manager or member deems relevant, including the long-term prospects and interests of the limited liability company and its members, and the social, economic, legal, or other effects of any action on the employees, suppliers, and customers of the limited liability company, the communities and society in which the limited liability company operates, and the economy of this state and the nation.
(9) This section applies to a person winding up the limited liability company activities and affairs as the legal representative of the last surviving member as if such person were subject to this section.
History.—s. 2, ch. 2013-180; ss. 5, 23, ch. 2015-148.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2023 · leading case: Silver Crown Invs., LLC v. Team Real Estate Mgmt., LLC
Silver Crown Invs., LLC v. Team Real Estate Mgmt., LLC (2018)
“Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Violation of Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 (Count II) From the outset, Defendants assert that Plaintiffs' breach of fiduciary duty in violation of Fla.”
TMJ Grp. LLC v. IMCMV Holdings Inc. (2018)
“Fla. Stat. Ann. § 605.04091 (West). Id. Id.”
Brown v. Luboff (In re Sigma-Tech Sales, Inc.) (2017)
“Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 (1). “The duty of care in the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs is to refrain from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, willful or intentional misconduct, or a knowing violation of law.”
AMERICAN SALES AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION LLC D/B/A EULEN AMERICA v. LUIS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ (2023)
“” However, the trial court’s decision to grant indemnification pursuant to the above provision of the Operating Agreement was erroneous because Chapter 605 expressly prohibits an operating agreement from providing indemnification to a manager who has breached a duty of care or…”
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company v. Yanowitch (2022)
“Of the twenty-five counts in the Underlying Complaint, eight are against the Yanowitch Defendants including: Common Law Breach of Fiduciary Duty against Yanowitch (Count IV); Vicarious Liability against Yanowitch Law (Count VI); Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Violation of Florida…”
— 605.04091(1) — 1 case
AMERICAN SALES AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION LLC D/B/A EULEN AMERICA v. LUIS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ (2023)
“” However, the trial court’s decision to grant indemnification pursuant to the above provision of the Operating Agreement was erroneous because Chapter 605 expressly prohibits an operating agreement from providing indemnification to a manager who has breached a duty of care or…”
— 605.04091(2)(b) — 1 case
AMERICAN SALES AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION LLC D/B/A EULEN AMERICA v. LUIS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ (2023)
“” However, the trial court’s decision to grant indemnification pursuant to the above provision of the Operating Agreement was erroneous because Chapter 605 expressly prohibits an operating agreement from providing indemnification to a manager who has breached a duty of care or…”
— 605.04091(3) — 1 case
AMERICAN SALES AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION LLC D/B/A EULEN AMERICA v. LUIS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ (2023)
“” However, the trial court’s decision to grant indemnification pursuant to the above provision of the Operating Agreement was erroneous because Chapter 605 expressly prohibits an operating agreement from providing indemnification to a manager who has breached a duty of care or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.