Florida Statute 606.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Chapter 606
BUSINESS COORDINATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 606.03

606.03 Definitions.—As used in this act:

(1) “Business entity” means any form of corporation, partnership, association, cooperative, joint venture, business trust, or sole proprietorship that conducts business in this state.

(2) “Department” means the Department of State.

(3) “Master business index” means that database maintained by the department which indexes all business entity records maintained by any state government agency.

(4) “Participating agency” means an agency of government which elects to participate in the exchange of information through the master business index.

(5) “Single business identifier” means the unique record number assigned to a business entity by the department in compliance with the provisions of this act.

(6) “State agency” means any state government agency, department, or commission which has jurisdiction over business entities.

(7) “Uniform business report” means an information gathering document distributed by the department to collect or update current data for the master business index.

History.—s. 3, ch. 97-15; s. 1, ch. 99-218.

F.S. 606.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 606.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 606.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 606.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 606.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 606.03

Total Results: 18

Carlos De La Melena v. Joanna Patricia Montezuma Panez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-22

Snippet: sustaining Mother’s objection to this evidence. See § 90.606(3), Fla. Stat.; Blanco. v. State, 452 So. 2d 520,

STEVEN KENNETH KAISER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-08-11

Snippet: ” Owens, 303 So. 3d at 997; Kirk, 303 So. 3d at 606. 3 Additionally, the First District has held “that

King v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-19

Citation: 990 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 4265182

Snippet: was released from prison pursuant to section 944.606(3)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2001) (requiring DOC to

Department of Corrections v. Daughtry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-04-05

Citation: 954 So. 2d 659, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4961, 2007 WL 1009915

Snippet: offender releasee. DOC finds this duty in section 944.606(3)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2005), which provides

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2006-03-08

Snippet: 6 Section 944.606(2), Fla. Stat. 7 See s. 944.606(3)(a)1., Fla. Stat., stating: "The department must

BCS, SRL v. Wise

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-08-05

Citation: 910 So. 2d 871

Snippet: translated into English pursuant to section 90.606(3).[5] We therefore remand to the lower court for

Gopar-Santana v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-10-03

Citation: 862 So. 2d 54, 2003 WL 22259453

Snippet: and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. NOTES [1] Section 90.606(3), Florida Statutes (2001), requires that the interpreter

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2001-02-28

Snippet: Section 775.21(6)(l), Fla. Stat. 12 See, ss. 944.606(3)(d) and (4), Fla. Stat., authorizing local law enforcement

Echemendia v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-02

Citation: 735 So. 2d 555, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7269, 1999 WL 345603

Snippet: and this appeal followed. Pursuant to section 90.606(3), Florida Statute (1997), an interpreter must “make

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1997-02-10

Snippet: 606(2), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.). 5 See, s. 944.606(3)(a) and (b), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.), stating: "(3)(a)

Nodar v. Galbreath

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-12-13

Citation: 462 So. 2d 803, 23 Educ. L. Rep. 406

Snippet: which is not present in Montgomery. 23 Fla. at 606, 3 So. at 217. The addition of the word "or" had the

Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Ane

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-13

Citation: 458 So. 2d 239, 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2383

Snippet: defame and injure." Montgomery v. Knox, 23 Fla. 595, 606, 3 So. 211, 217 (1887). *241 The United States Supreme

Monte v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-28

Citation: 443 So. 2d 339

Snippet: whether the specific oath required by section 90.606(3) was administered, and neither an agreement stipulating

Balderrama v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-07-01

Citation: 433 So. 2d 1311

Snippet: interpret for the witness shall be sworn to do so. § 90.606(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). If a defendant does not understand

R & D Sod Farms, Inc. v. Vestal

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-05-25

Citation: 432 So. 2d 622, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19547

Snippet: was not sworn to interpret as required by § 90.606(3), Fla.Stat. Therefore, such testimony cannot be

Deese v. Mobley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-01-16

Citation: 392 So. 2d 364, 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1314

Snippet: Comment, 19B, Florida Statutes Annotated, § 673.606; 3, Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-606:4,

Matthews v. Deland State Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-25

Citation: 334 So. 2d 164

Snippet: 2d at 894. See Montgomery v. Knox, 23 Fla. 595, 606, 3 So. 211, 217 (1887). Appellant has referred us

Admiral Development Corporation v. City of Maitland

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-10-18

Citation: 267 So. 2d 860

Snippet: 1971, 4 Cal.3d 633, 94 Cal. Rptr. 630, 484 P.2d 606.[3] Our conclusion that the ordinance in question