Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 17
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-08-11T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: ” Owens, 303 So. 3d at 997; Kirk, 303 So. 3d at 606. 3 Additionally, the First District has held “
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-09-19T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 990 So. 2d 1191
Snippet: was released from prison pursuant to section 944.606(3)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2001) (requiring DOC to…#x27;s duty to disclose pursuant to section 944.606(3)(a)1. arises only if the address is known to the… reporting requirement contained in section 944.606(3)(a)1., our analysis of that statute reveals that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-04-05T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 954 So. 2d 659
Snippet: offender releasee. DOC finds this duty in section 944.606(3)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2005), which provides …made known to the court by the DOC. Section 944.606(3)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2005), provides that the Florida
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2006-03-07T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: . 6 Section 944.606(2), Fla. Stat. 7 See s. 944.606(3)(a)1., Fla. Stat., stating: "The department…residence address, if known. . . ." 8 Section 944.606(3)(d), Fla. Stat. 9 See Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 01
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-08-05T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 910 So. 2d 871
Snippet: translated into English pursuant to section 90.606(3).[5] We therefore remand to the lower court for
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-10-03T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 862 So. 2d 54
Snippet: and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. NOTES [1] Section 90.606(3), Florida Statutes (2001), requires that the interpreter
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2001-02-27T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: Section 775.21(6)(l), Fla. Stat. 12 See, ss. 944.606(3)(d) and (4), Fla. Stat., authorizing local law enforcement
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-06-02T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 735 So. 2d 555, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7269, 1999 WL 345603
Snippet: and this appeal followed. Pursuant to section 90.606(3), Florida Statute (1997), an interpreter must “make
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1997-02-09T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: .606(2), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.). 5 See, s. 944.606(3)(a) and (b), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.), stating: &
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1984-12-13T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 462 So. 2d 803
Snippet: which is not present in Montgomery. 23 Fla. at 606, 3 So. at 217. The addition of the word "or"
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1984-09-13T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 458 So. 2d 239
Snippet: injure." Montgomery v. Knox, 23 Fla. 595, 606, 3 So. 211, 217 (1887). *241 The United States Supreme
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-12-27T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 443 So. 2d 339
Snippet: whether the specific oath required by section 90.606(3) was administered, and neither an agreement stipulating… name, the specific oath required by section 90.606(3), or instructions which the trial court gave the…: (1) the specific oath required by section 90.606(3) is administered to and taken by the interpreter
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-07-01T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 433 So. 2d 1311
Snippet: interpret for the witness shall be sworn to do so. § 90.606(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). If a defendant does not understand
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-05-25T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 432 So. 2d 622, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19547
Snippet: was not sworn to interpret as required by § 90.606(3), Fla.Stat. Therefore, such testimony cannot be
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-01-15T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 392 So. 2d 364
Snippet: Comment, 19B, Florida Statutes Annotated, § 673.606; 3, Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-606:4,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-06-25T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 334 So. 2d 164
Snippet: .2d at 894. See Montgomery v. Knox, 23 Fla. 595, 606, 3 So. 211, 217 (1887). Appellant has referred us
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-10-18T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 267 So. 2d 860
Snippet: 1971, 4 Cal.3d 633, 94 Cal. Rptr. 630, 484 P.2d 606.[3] Our conclusion that the ordinance in question