Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 607.1330 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 607.1330 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 607.1330 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 607.1330

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 607
FLORIDA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
View Entire Chapter
607.1330 Court action.
(1) If a shareholder makes demand for payment under s. 607.1326 which remains unsettled, the corporation shall commence a proceeding within 60 days after receiving the payment demand and petition the court to determine the fair value of the shares and accrued interest, if and to the extent applicable, calculated and accrued from the date the corporate action became effective and taking into account the amount of any prepayment previously made to the shareholder by the corporation pursuant to s. 607.1326(3). If the corporation does not commence the proceeding within the 60-day period, any shareholder who has made a demand pursuant to s. 607.1326 may commence the proceeding in the name of the corporation.
(2) The proceeding shall be commenced in the circuit court in the applicable county. If by virtue of the corporate action becoming effective the entity has become a foreign eligible entity without a registered office in this state, the proceeding shall be commenced in the county in this state in which the principal office or registered office of the domestic corporation merged with the foreign eligible entity was located immediately before the time the corporate action became effective. If such entity has, and immediately before the corporate action became effective had, no principal or registered office in this state, then the proceeding shall be commenced in the county in this state in which the corporation has, or immediately before the time the corporate action became effective had, an office in this state. If such entity has, or immediately before the time the corporate action became effective had, no office in this state, the proceeding shall be commenced in the county in which the corporation’s registered office is or was last located.
(3) All shareholders, whether or not residents of this state, whose demands remain unsettled shall be made parties to the proceeding as in an action against their shares. The corporation shall serve a copy of the initial pleading in such proceeding upon each shareholder party who is a resident of this state in the manner provided by law for the service of a summons and complaint and upon each nonresident shareholder party by registered or certified mail or by publication as provided by law.
(4) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced under subsection (2) is plenary and exclusive. If it so elects, the court may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair value. The appraisers shall have the powers described in the order appointing them or in any amendment to the order. The shareholders demanding appraisal rights are entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings. There shall be no right to a jury trial.
(5) Each shareholder entitled to appraisal rights who is made a party to the proceeding is entitled to judgment for the amount of the fair value of such shareholder’s shares as found by the court, plus accrued interest, if and to the extent applicable and as found by the court, taking into account the amount of any prepayment previously made to the shareholder by the corporation pursuant to s. 607.1326(3).
(6) The corporation shall pay each such shareholder the amount found to be due within 10 days after final determination of the proceedings. Upon payment of the judgment, the shareholder shall cease to have any rights to receive any further consideration with respect to such shares other than any amounts ordered to be paid for court costs and attorney fees under s. 607.1331.
History.s. 2, ch. 2004-378; s. 170, ch. 2019-90; s. 8, ch. 2021-13.

F.S. 607.1330 on Google Scholar

F.S. 607.1330 on CourtListener

Amendments to 607.1330


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 607.1330

Total Results: 5  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Foreclosure FreeSearch, Inc. v. Sullivan, 12 So. 3d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3866, 2009 WL 1139252

...of that shareholder's estimate of the fair value of the shares and demand payment of that estimate plus interest." § 607.1326(1), Fla. Stat. A corporation which disputes the amount proposed by the shareholder "shall commence a proceeding within 60 days after receiving the payment demand ...." § 607.1330(1), Fla....
...If the corporation fails to initiate a judicial proceeding, the "shareholder who has made a demand ... may commence the proceeding in the name of the corporation." Id. "The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced ... is plenary and exclusive." "§ 607.1330(4), Fla....
...the offer contained in the notice or to accept the valuation report's findings. M/S's concerns regarding their lack of access to FFS's books is meritless as M/S would be "entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings." § 607.1330(4), Fla....
Copy

Shiva Stein v. Bbx Capital Corp., 241 So. 3d 874 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...e merger. However, an adequate remedy at law exists—a court-supervised independent appraisal, wherein she would be “entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings.” Foreclosure FreeSearch, 12 So. 3d at 776 (quoting § 607.1330(4), Fla....
Copy

Lally Orange Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Sandhu, 207 So. 3d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18782

...to at the subsequent trial. 2 establish that the merger was “ineffective and illegal”; (2) damages for Appellants’ alleged breach of fiduciary duty; and/or (3) a judicial appraisal pursuant to section 607.1330, Florida Statutes (2013)....
...§ 607.1326(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). If a shareholder’s demand for payment remains unresolved, and a party seeks judicial appraisal of the corporate shares, the shareholder is entitled to judgment of fair value of the shares “as found by the court.” § 607.1330(5), Fla. Stat. (2013). To facilitate this process, the trial court “may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair value.” § 607.1330(4), Fla....
...based valuation solely on tax returns, which did not reveal the actual fair value of the corporations and no other record evidence supported such valuation). The trial court may appoint independent appraisers to recommend a decision on the question of fair value. § 607.1330(4), Fla....
...9 million valuation figure. On remand, the trial court must adopt a valuation that is supported by competent, substantial evidence, or appoint an independent appraiser to provide a recommendation on the fair value of Sandhu’s shares pursuant to section 607.1330(4), Florida Statutes (2013). REVERSED and REMANDED. ORFINGER, COHEN JJ....
Copy

Sinibaldi v. Sinibaldi ex rel. Get Strong, Inc., 100 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 WL 5253030, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17487

...Despite Anthony’s assertion that he amended his complaint through interlineation to include individual claims for relief, nothing in the record shows that any action other than the derivative actions on behalf of Get Strong were brought. In his complaint, Anthony raises counts seeking an accounting pursuant to section 607.1330, Florida Statutes (2007), and for breach of fiduciary duty, presumably pursuant to section 607.07401....
Copy

Omes v. Ultra Enter., Inc., 225 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12034, 2017 WL 3611546

...nd Russell and Charles Faibisch, and Adam Russakoff as individuals, invoking the appraisal process while at the same instance objecting to it. In response, UEI filed a one-count complaint to establish the fair value of Omes’s shares. See § 607.1330(1), Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.