Syfert Injury Law Firm

Daniel v. Morris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-04

Citation: 181 So. 3d 1195, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18132, 2015 WL 7782828

Snippet: can be done without a breach of the peace. § 679.609(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012). Creditors electing peaceful

Van Vechten v. Anyzeski

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-21

Citation: 157 So. 3d 350, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 722, 2015 WL 248731

Snippet: actions, including attorney’s fees.” • Section 733.609(2) states, in pertinent part: “When awarding taxable

Lowell Amey Van Vechten, as personal representative and trustee of the Estate of Nicola H. Amey v. Erica Anyzeski, as personal representative of the Estate of Milton Lain Benjamin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-21

Snippet: including attorney’s fees.”  Section 733.609(2) states, in pertinent part: “When awarding

State of Florida v. Kerrick Van Teamer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-03

Citation: 151 So. 3d 421, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 478, 2014 WL 2979378, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2149, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10282

Snippet: "lawfully transferred to such vehicle”); § 320.0609(2)(a) (making it unlawful to transfer license plates

O'HANLON v. Herndon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-02-18

Citation: 5 So. 3d 723, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 379, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1252, 2009 WL 386846

Snippet: with the Secretary of State pursuant to section 609.02, Florida Statutes (2006), and therefore, it could

PINTADO v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-14

Citation: 970 So. 2d 857, 2007 WL 3355092

Snippet: n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (noting that Section 90.609(2), Florida Statutes, permits only the admission of

Trowell v. J.C. Penney Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-17

Citation: 813 So. 2d 1042, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 2002 WL 561693

Snippet: bright-line at ten years. Federal Rule of Evidence 609(2)(b) provides that if more than ten years have passed

Quevedo v. South Florida Water Management District

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-06-07

Citation: 762 So. 2d 982, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6853, 2000 WL 726480

Snippet: claim of detrimental reliance under Rule 40E-1.609(2), finding that Quevedo was aware, before erecting

Smith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-03

Citation: 674 So. 2d 791, 1996 WL 220559

Snippet: testimony was not admissible pursuant to sections 90.609(2) and 90.404(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1991). Arias

Een v. Rice

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-05-25

Citation: 637 So. 2d 331

Snippet: cent negligent. The jury awarded the appellant $20,609.02 for medical expenses and returned a zero dollar

Arias v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-01-14

Citation: 593 So. 2d 260, 1992 WL 4083

Snippet: regarding the proper interpretation of subsection 90.609(2), Florida Statutes (1989), the wording of which

Reyes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-05-28

Citation: 580 So. 2d 309, 1991 WL 87226

Snippet: testimony was properly admitted under section 90.609(2), Florida Statutes (1989). That section permits

Allright of Miami, Inc. v. Oesterle

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-05-26

Citation: 507 So. 2d 771, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1339, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8439

Snippet: Wallace, 417 So.2d 1022 (Fla.2d DCA 1982); § 90.609(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). Accordingly, we reverse and

Mohorn v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-01-04

Citation: 462 So. 2d 81, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11791

Snippet: Evidence § 1104 (Rev. ed. 1972). See also section 90.609(2), Florida Statutes (1983). We cannot say, however

Lance v. Wade

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-08-30

Citation: 457 So. 2d 1008

Snippet: Note, 1938, 114 A.L.R. 1015, 1019). 347 So.2d at 609.[2] In Frankel this Court dealt with an entirely different

Boyd v. Boulevard National Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-01-14

Citation: 306 So. 2d 551

Snippet: Mortgage Investors, was shown to have complied with § 609.02 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., to qualify it to transact business

Goodman v. Olsen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-03-12

Citation: 291 So. 2d 71, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7845

Snippet: 1897, 78 N.Y. 137; Breunich v. Weselman, 100 N.Y. 609, 2 N.E. 385; U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co. v

Carter v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-12-29

Citation: 242 So. 2d 737

Snippet: Lett v. State (Fla.App. 1967) 195 So.2d 608, 609. [2] Eggers v. Narron (Fla. 1970) 238 So.2d 72; Gissendanner

Conner v. State Road Dept. of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-09-04

Citation: 66 So. 2d 257

Snippet: 43 So. 235; Akin v. State, 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609; 2 Encyc. Pldg. & Prac. 727." It is last contended

City of Miami v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-07-28

Citation: 190 So. 774, 139 Fla. 598, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1710

Snippet: to dismiss the plaintiff's petition; and *Page 609 (2) and (3) striking from intervenors' answer certain