Florida Statute 616.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Chapter 616
PUBLIC FAIRS AND EXPOSITIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 616.06

616.06 Amount of indebtedness authorized.—Any fair association may subject itself to indebtedness or liability in an aggregate sum not greater than the limit stated in its charter or any amendment thereto, without regard to the value of its property. Any fair association may also subject itself to specific bonded or mortgage indebtedness, in addition to and without regard to its general powers or limit as to indebtedness or liability.

History.—s. 4, ch. 7388, 1917; RGS 4522; CGL 6521; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 25, 26, ch. 83-239; ss. 8, 44, ch. 93-168.

F.S. 616.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 616.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 616.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 616.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 616.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 616.06

Total Results: 20

Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. Florida State Board of Education

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Citation: 262 So. 3d 127

Snippet: cases of glass, Boyd v. United States , 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), or cell phone location

State v. Stahl

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-07

Citation: 206 So. 3d 124, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18067

Snippet: 1569 (“Several of Boyd[ v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886) ]’s express or implicit

State v. Yee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-10-14

Citation: 177 So. 3d 72, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15198, 2015 WL 5965213

Snippet: In Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), the Supreme Court

Alvarez v. City of Hialeah

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-04

Citation: 900 So. 2d 761, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6509, 2005 WL 1027087

Snippet: forfeiture proceedings); Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886) (evidence obtained

Ingraham v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-03-08

Citation: 811 So. 2d 770, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2880, 2002 WL 360009

Snippet: ” Id. (quoting Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886)). “The particularity

Golon v. Jenne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-08-18

Citation: 739 So. 2d 659, 1999 WL 625422

Snippet: forfeiture proceedings); Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886) (evidence obtained

DEPT. OF BUSINESS v. Calder Race Course

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-07-29

Citation: 724 So. 2d 100, 1998 WL 422515

Snippet: businesses, see Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), the Court acknowledged

State v. Lopez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-12-17

Citation: 590 So. 2d 1045, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12648, 1991 WL 267948

Snippet: search and seizure, Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), the United States

MacIas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-11-05

Citation: 515 So. 2d 206, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 553

Snippet: produce one's papers. Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 [6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746]. On the other hand, both

State v. MacIas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-01-22

Citation: 481 So. 2d 979, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 243

Snippet: produce one's papers. Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746. On the other hand, both

Cowan v. PEOPLE EX REL. FLA. DENTAL ASS'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-27

Citation: 463 So. 2d 285

Snippet: largely grounded upon Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), which held seizure

Cowan v. People ex rel. Florida Dental Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-12-05

Citation: 463 So. 2d 285, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16724

Snippet: largely grounded upon Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 624, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), which held seizure

West v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-21

Citation: 439 So. 2d 907, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21784

Snippet: 236-37 (1927); Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886). A search warrant

Delisi v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-11-19

Citation: 423 So. 2d 934

Snippet: which it seeks. In Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), the Supreme *936

Bludworth v. Arcuri

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-14

Citation: 416 So. 2d 882

Snippet: opinion also quotes Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), for the statement

State v. Tsavaris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-02-12

Citation: 394 So. 2d 418

Snippet: early decision of Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), the Supreme Court

City of Hollywood v. Washington

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-07-22

Citation: 384 So. 2d 1315

Snippet: criminal sanction. Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886) and Lees v. United

State v. Tsavaris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-06

Citation: 382 So. 2d 56

Snippet: private document. Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886). The Court said

Tsavaris v. Scruggs

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-17

Citation: 360 So. 2d 745

Snippet: of Appeal cited Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886), for the proposition

Orosz v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-23

Citation: 334 So. 2d 26

Snippet: 568 (1897)]; Boyd v. United States, [116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 524, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886)].' Lefkowitz v.