Cases from cite.case.law:

BOWYER, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 910 F. Supp. 2d 173 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . . § 1-616.13. . . . once it has been demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that an activity proscribed by [§ 1-616.13 . . .

J. KEYES, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 372 F.3d 434 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . She also alleged the violation of the District of Columbia’s whistleblower statute, D.C.Code § 1-616.13 . . .

In E. GLATSTIAN M. LAPIN, Dr. L. P. v. E. GLATSTIAN,, 215 B.R. 495 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1997)

. . . FMF used an incorrect judgment amount of $20,616.25 for 1987 rather than the correct amount of $20,-616.13 . . .

WILHELM v. UNITED STATES K. DOVER, W. E. K. v. UNITED STATES, 257 F. Supp. 16 (D. Wyo 1966)

. . . On July 2, 1963, additional income tax of $616.13 and interest of $45.66 was assessed against the Do-vers . . .