Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 617.0834 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 617.0834 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 617.0834 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 617.0834

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 617
CORPORATIONS NOT FOR PROFIT
View Entire Chapter
617.0834 Officers and directors of certain corporations and associations not for profit; immunity from civil liability.
(1) An officer or director of a nonprofit organization recognized under s. 501(c)(3) or s. 501(c)(4) or s. 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or of an agricultural or a horticultural organization recognized under s. 501(c)(5), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, is not personally liable for monetary damages to any person for any statement, vote, decision, or failure to take an action, regarding organizational management or policy by an officer or director, unless:
(a) The officer or director breached or failed to perform his or her duties as an officer or director; and
(b) The officer’s or director’s breach of, or failure to perform, his or her duties constitutes:
1. A violation of the criminal law, unless the officer or director had reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was lawful or had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. A judgment or other final adjudication against an officer or director in any criminal proceeding for violation of the criminal law estops that officer or director from contesting the fact that his or her breach, or failure to perform, constitutes a violation of the criminal law, but does not estop the officer or director from establishing that he or she had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was lawful or had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful;
2. A transaction from which the officer or director derived an improper personal benefit, directly or indirectly; or
3. Recklessness or an act or omission that was committed in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the term:
(a) “Recklessness” means the acting, or omission to act, in conscious disregard of a risk:
1. Known, or so obvious that it should have been known, to the officer or director; and
2. Known to the officer or director, or so obvious that it should have been known, to be so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow from such action or omission.
(b) “Director” means a person who serves as a director, trustee, or member of the governing board of an organization.
(c) “Officer” means a person who serves as an officer without compensation except reimbursement for actual expenses incurred or to be incurred.
History.s. 54, ch. 90-179; s. 92, ch. 97-102; s. 33, ch. 2009-205.

F.S. 617.0834 on Google Scholar

F.S. 617.0834 on CourtListener

Amendments to 617.0834


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 617.0834

Total Results: 11  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Fox v. Prof'l Wrecker Operators of Florida, Inc., 801 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16954, 2001 WL 1516949

...Whether The Complaint Fails To State A Cause Of Action Against The Appellees As Directors of The Corporation Section 617.0830 sets forth the standards of performance required of directors *181 of not-for-profit corporations. Fox argues that directors who meet these standards enjoy immunity from civil liability pursuant to section 617.0834. Fox specifically cites section 617.0834(1) in support of her argument that Counts III, V, VII, IX, and XI of her complaint properly allege a derivative action for breach of fiduciary duty against each director individually. PWOF asserts that in the absence of any allegations by Fox that PWOF comes within the ambit of section 617.0834, which specifies that it only applies to corporations recognized under sections 501(c)(3), (c)(4), and (c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code and agricultural or horticultural organizations recognized under (c)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code, section 617.0831 applies. Section 617.0831 makes section 607.0831 of the general corporations chapter applicable to nonprofit corporations. Section 607.0831, which is analogous to section 617.0834, essentially provides that directors are immune from liability in their individual capacity, absent fraud, criminal activity or self-dealing/unjust enrichment....
Copy

Sonny Boy, LLC v. Asnani, 879 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8418, 2004 WL 1175221

...rm of fraud, self-dealing or unjust enrichment to trigger individual liability); Munder v. Circle One Condominium, Inc., 596 So.2d 144 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (reversing lower court's finding of individual liability by condominium developer). Similarly, section 617.0834(1), Florida Statutes *28 (2002) [1] and section 607.0831(1), Florida Statutes (2002) [2] provide insulation for condominium association directors from liability in their individual capacities absent fraud, criminal activity, self-dealing, or unjust enrichment....
...However, the court went far beyond what was necessary to resolve the personal liability issue by declaring that chapter 607 and chapter 617, which deal with corporations in general, control the issue of condominium association director liability. Both section 617.0834(1) and section 607.0831(1) limit personal liability of directors of non-profit and for profit corporations to misdeeds arising to the level of criminal law violations, deriving personal benefits, reckless acts, and acts committed in bad faith or with a malicious purpose....
...s 607 and 617 as applicable. (emphasis supplied) This section applies to associations, not directors. And, it provides chapter 718 controls condominium associations, where in conflict with chapters 607 and 617. Section 718.303(1) is in conflict with section 617.0834(1) and 607.0831(1)....
...favors the developer over the association. For elected directors of associations, personal liability should be premised on malfeasances which parallel director-appointed directors, only if the actions or inactions are willful and knowing. NOTES [1] Section 617.0834(1), Florida Statutes (2002), provides in part: (1) An officer or director of a nonprofit organization ......
Copy

Perlow v. Goldberg, 700 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 631301

...s control the actions and governance of condominium associations and address the liability of the associations' directors. Each of these three sections requires more than simple negligence before personal liability for monetary damages attaches. See § 617.0834(1), Fla....
...out of the general rule stated herein. See, e.g., Curbelo v. Sweetwater Creek Homeowners Condominium Ass'n, Inc., 653 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review denied, 662 So.2d 933 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, the order of dismissal is affirmed. NOTES [1] Section 617.0834(1), Florida Statutes (1995), provides, in part: An officer or director of a nonprofit organization......
Copy

Hous. Opportunities Proj. for Excellence, Inc. v. Key Colony No. 4 Condo. Assoc., Inc., 510 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1911, 2007 WL 117939

...annot be held individually liable. In arguing that the individual board members cannot be held liable, Defendants cite Florida case law regarding the liability of officers and directors of not-for-profit corporations. Defendants specifically rely on section 617.0834 of the Florida Statutes which holds that officers and directors of not-for-profit corporations are generally immune from personal liability for corporate acts....
...ery discriminatory act mentioned infra during their tenure as Members of the Board of Directors. As such, each reference to BOTANICA includes each and every member of the Defendant members of the Board of Directors." (D.E. No. 29 at 5). In addition, section 617.0834, a state statute, cannot be applied to bar Plaintiffs' federal cause of action. Furthermore, it is alleged that the board of directors each personally and intentionally discriminated against families. Section 617.0834 does not protect against willful violations of rights protected by the Fair Housing Act. 617.0834(1)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (stating that the statute's immunity does not apply where the officer's breach his or her duties constitutes "[r]ecklessness or an act or omission which was committed in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a...
Copy

Berg v. Wagner, 935 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2265412

...ation directors Laszlo Wagner, David Brodsky, Frank Lloyd, and Robert Shipman, in their individual capacities. The directors moved for summary judgment, arguing Berg's claims against them were barred as a consequence of the immunity afforded them by section 617.0834, Florida Statutes, and the running of the statute of limitations. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment and this appeal followed. We agree with appellant that the summary judgment in favor of the individual directors cannot be sustained on the grounds of the immunity afforded by section 617.0834....
...Affirmed in Part; Reversed in Part; and Remanded. STEVENSON, C.J., GUNTHER and MAY, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 617.303, Florida Statutes, was repealed and renumbered in 2000. The provisions relevant to this appeal now appear in chapter 720. [2] Section 617.0834, Florida Statutes, provides that directors are not personally liable for "any statement, vote, decision, or failure to take an action," unless: (a) The officer or director breached or failed to perform his or her duties as an officer...
Copy

Landrum v. John Doe Pit Digger, 696 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 374187

...Snyder, II, William Dooley and Sandra Sutton. [2] By order dated November 21, 1995, the trial court granted the motion to dismiss Marv Silvern. The dismissal was with the reservation that the plaintiff could amend the complaint should it become apparent that Marv Silvern had violated section 617.0834, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Collado v. Baroukh, 226 So. 3d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12469, 2017 WL 3727049

...not alleged to have breached any duty. The dismissal in favor of the three board members individually is correct as they may be allegedly liable only in their representative capacity for breach of their fiduciary duty as officers and directors. See § 617.0834, Fla....
Copy

Brin v. Fuchs, 688 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1843, 1997 WL 91407

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 617.0834, Fla. Stat. (1994).
Copy

King David of Sunny Isles Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Alex Bushoy (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

... repairs, allegations which are not indicative of fraud, self-dealing or unjust enrichment”); § 607.0831(1), Fla. Stat. (providing exceptions to general rule that “[a] director is not personally liable for monetary damages to the corporation”); § 617.0834(1)(b), Fla....
Copy

New Horizons Condo. Master Ass'n, Inc. v. Robert Harding (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...limited liability company is not personally liable for monetary damages to the limited liability company, its members, or any other person for any statement, vote, decision, or failure to act regarding management or policy decisions . . . .”); § 617.0834(1), Fla....
Copy

Elena Collado, Etc. v. Brigitte Baroukh (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...not alleged to have breached any duty. The dismissal in favor of the three board members individually is correct as they may be allegedly liable only in their representative capacity for breach of their fiduciary duty as officers and directors. See § 617.0834, Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.