Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 624.4211 (2025)
Administrative fine in lieu of suspension or revocation.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
624.4211 Administrative fine in lieu of suspension or revocation.—
(1) If the office finds that one or more grounds exist for the discretionary revocation or suspension of a certificate of authority issued under this chapter, the office may, in lieu of such revocation or suspension, impose a fine upon the insurer.
(2)(a) With respect to a nonwillful violation, such fine may not exceed:
1. Twenty-five thousand dollars per violation, up to an aggregate amount of $100,000 for all nonwillful violations arising out of the same action, related to a covered loss or claim caused by an emergency for which the Governor declared a state of emergency pursuant to s. 252.36.
2. Twelve thousand five hundred dollars per violation, up to an aggregate amount of $50,000 for all other nonwillful violations arising out of the same action.
(b) If an insurer discovers a nonwillful violation, the insurer shall correct the violation and, if restitution is due, make restitution to all affected persons. Such restitution shall include interest at 12 percent per year from either the date of the violation or the date of inception of the affected person’s policy, at the insurer’s option. The restitution may be a credit against future premiums due, provided that interest accumulates until the premiums are due. If the amount of restitution due to any person is $50 or more and the insurer wishes to credit it against future premiums, it shall notify such person that she or he may receive a check instead of a credit. If the credit is on a policy that is not renewed, the insurer shall pay the restitution to the person to whom it is due.
(3)(a) With respect to a knowing and willful violation of a lawful order or rule of the office or commission or a provision of this code, the office may impose a fine upon the insurer in an amount not to exceed:
1. Two hundred thousand dollars for each such violation, up to an aggregate amount of $1 million for all knowing and willful violations arising out of the same action, related to a covered loss or claim caused by an emergency for which the Governor declared a state of emergency pursuant to s. 252.36.
2. One hundred thousand dollars for each such violation, up to an aggregate amount of $500,000 for all other knowing and willful violations arising out of the same action.
(b) In addition to such fines, the insurer shall make restitution when due in accordance with subsection (2).
(4) The failure of an insurer to make restitution when due as required under this section constitutes a willful violation of this code. However, if an insurer in good faith is uncertain as to whether any restitution is due or as to the amount of such restitution, it shall promptly notify the office of the circumstances; and the failure to make restitution pending a determination thereof shall not constitute a violation of this code.
History.—s. 1, ch. 72-248; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 21, ch. 78-95; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 55, 64, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 183, ch. 97-102; s. 800, ch. 2003-261; s. 4, ch. 2008-66; s. 6, ch. 2023-172.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1991–2012 · leading case: Dyer v. Dept. of Ins. & Treasurer, 585 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Dyer v. Dept. of Ins. & Treasurer, 585 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). “Section 624.4211 is found in Part III of the initial chapter of the Florida Insurance Code, entitled "Administration and General Provisions.”
QBE Ins. Corp. v. Chalfonte Condo. Apt. Ass'n, 94 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2012). “§ 624.4211(1) (allowing the Department to impose a fine on an insurance company instead of suspending or revoking a certificate of authority).”
Roche Sur. & Cas. Co. v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., Off. of Ins. Reg., 895 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Department accepted the ALJ’s findings of fact, but took exception to what it deemed to be conclusions of law that disregarded the period between February 24 and August 15, 2003, during which Roche was holding the build-up funds notwithstanding its knowledge of David’s…”
Chalfonte Condo. Apt. Ass'n v. QBE Ins., 526 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (S.D. Fla. 2007). “310(5) (allowing the Department of Insurance to impose a fine “against any person found in the proceeding to have violated any provision of the Insurance Code”); Section 624.4211 (allowing the Department *1257 of Insurance to impose a fine on an insurance company instead of…”
— 624.4211(1) — 2 cases
QBE Ins. Corp. v. Chalfonte Condo. Apt. Ass'n, 94 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2012). “§ 624.4211(1) (allowing the Department to impose a fine on an insurance company instead of suspending or revoking a certificate of authority).”
Dyer v. Dept. of Ins. & Treasurer, 585 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). “Section 624.4211 is found in Part III of the initial chapter of the Florida Insurance Code, entitled "Administration and General Provisions.”
— 624.4211(3) — 1 case
Roche Sur. & Cas. Co. v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., Off. of Ins. Reg., 895 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Department accepted the ALJ’s findings of fact, but took exception to what it deemed to be conclusions of law that disregarded the period between February 24 and August 15, 2003, during which Roche was holding the build-up funds notwithstanding its knowledge of David’s…”
— 624.4211(4) — 1 case
Roche Sur. & Cas. Co. v. Dep't of Fin. Servs., Off. of Ins. Reg., 895 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Department accepted the ALJ’s findings of fact, but took exception to what it deemed to be conclusions of law that disregarded the period between February 24 and August 15, 2003, during which Roche was holding the build-up funds notwithstanding its knowledge of David’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.