627.0915
Rate filings; workers’ compensation, drug-free workplace, and safe employers.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
627.0915 Rate filings; workers’ compensation, drug-free workplace, and safe employers.—
(1) The office shall approve rating plans for workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance that give specific identifiable consideration in the setting of rates to employers that either implement a drug-free workplace program pursuant to s. 440.102 and rules adopted under such section or implement a safety program pursuant to provisions of the rating plan or implement both a drug-free workplace program and a safety program. The plans must be actuarially sound and must state the savings anticipated to result from such drug-testing and safety programs.
(2) An insurer offering a rate plan approved under this section shall notify the employer at the time of the initial quote for the policy and at the time of each renewal of the policy of the availability of the premium discount where a drug-free workplace plan is used by the employer pursuant to s. 440.102 and rules adopted under such section. The Financial Services Commission may adopt rules to implement the provisions of this subsection.
History.—s. 51, ch. 90-201; s. 49, ch. 91-1; s. 17, ch. 91-201; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 94, ch. 93-415; s. 5, ch. 98-126; s. 34, ch. 2001-91; s. 67, ch. 2002-194; s. 1077, ch. 2003-261; s. 26, ch. 2004-374.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1995–2019 · leading case: Skf Management v. Unemployment Appeals
Skf Management v. Unemployment Appeals (1995)
“He described Buena Vista as a self-insured entity, and opined that its program is run consistently with the requirements of section 627.0915. However, he did not testify that the self-insurance unit of the state insurance department had certified its compliance, nor that Buena…”
Clifford McCullough v. Nesco Resources LLC (2019)
“Employers who do not follow the statute’s procedures are ineligible for workers’ compensation insurance discounts under Fla. Stat. § 627.0915 . Id. § 440.102(2).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.