Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 627.607 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 627.607 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 627.607 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 627.607

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 627.607
627.607 Time limit on certain defenses.
(1) The contract shall include the following provision:

“Time Limit on Certain Defenses: After 2 years from the issue date, only fraudulent misstatements in the application may be used to void the policy or deny any claim for loss incurred or disability starting after the 2-year period.”

(2) A policy may, in place of the provision set forth in subsection (1), include the following provision:

“Incontestable:

(a) Misstatements in the Application: After this policy has been in force for 2 years during the insured’s lifetime (excluding any period during which the insured is disabled), the insurer cannot contest the statements in the application.
(b) Preexisting Conditions: No claim for loss incurred or disability starting after 2 years from the issue date will be reduced or denied because a sickness or physical condition, not excluded by name or specific description before the date of loss, had existed before the effective date of coverage.”
History.s. 550, ch. 59-205; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 456, 497, 809(2nd), ch. 82-243; s. 79, ch. 82-386; ss. 56, 114, ch. 92-318.

F.S. 627.607 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.607 on CourtListener

Amendments to 627.607


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 627.607

Total Results: 6

Kaufman v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.

681 So. 2d 747, 1996 WL 425720

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 1722272

Cited 12 times | Published

the insurance policy was in conflict with section 627.607, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992).[1] She contended

North Miami General Hosp. v. Central Nat. Life Ins. Co.

419 So. 2d 800, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1982 | Docket: 1754024

Cited 7 times | Published

Affirmed in part, reversed in part. NOTES [1] § 627.607, Fla. Stat. (1975). [2] For reasons unapparent

Stewart v. Midland Life Ins. Co.

899 So. 2d 331, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2241, 2005 WL 433201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2005 | Docket: 755871

Cited 3 times | Published

two-year contestable period in the policy. See § 627.607, Fla. Stat. (2001). Following her husband's death

DiFranco v. NAT. FOUND. LIFE INS. CO.

551 So. 2d 535, 1989 WL 110936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1989 | Docket: 2518148

Cited 3 times | Published

the subject insurance policy, as required by Section 627.607, Florida Statutes (1987), clearly precludes

Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. v. Damus

864 So. 2d 442, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16695, 2003 WL 22493857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2003 | Docket: 64827633

Published

policy’s incontestability clause, pursuant to section 627.607, Florida Statutes (2002), because the policy

Paul Revere Life Insurance v. McPhee

144 F. Supp. 2d 1375, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8112, 2001 WL 681300

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2001 | Docket: 2183839

Published

clause is mandated by Florida law. See FLA.STAT. § 627.607.[1] In addition to the required incontestability/preexisting