Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 648.55 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 648.55 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 648.55

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 648
BAIL BOND AGENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 648.55
648.55 All bail bond agents of same agency; licensed by same companies.All bail bond agents who are members of the same agency, partnership, corporation, or association shall be appointed to represent the same companies. If any member of such agency, partnership, corporation, or association is licensed and appointed as a professional bail bond agent, all members thereof shall be so licensed and appointed. It is the responsibility of each insurer to require that each bail bond agent in an agency is appointed to represent that particular insurer.
History.s. 20, ch. 29621, 1955; s. 4, ch. 57-63; s. 177, ch. 70-339; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 71, 72, ch. 82-175; ss. 50, 51, ch. 84-103; s. 5, ch. 87-321; ss. 41, 46, 47, ch. 90-131; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 40, ch. 96-372.
Note.Former s. 903.56.

F.S. 648.55 on Google Scholar

F.S. 648.55 on Casetext

Amendments to 648.55


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 648.55
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 648.55.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GENERAL CATEGORY SCALLOP FISHERMEN, v. SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,, 720 F. Supp. 2d 564 (D.N.J. 2010)

. . . . § 648.55 (framework adjustments to scallop fishery management measures); 73 Fed. . . .

OCEANA, INC. v. L. EVANS,, 384 F. Supp. 2d 203 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . . § 648.55. . . . Id; 50 C.F.R § 648.55®. . . . Id. § 648.55(j). . . . Although framework adjustments under 50 C.F.R. § 648.55 are “regulations” in that they are published . . . FMP objectives and limit fishing mortality.” 50 CFR § 648.55(a) (emphasis added). . . .

CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION v. L. EVANS,, 360 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 648.55, a process with which the plaintiffs were familiar. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 648.55 (setting forth framework adjustment procedures). . . . .

CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,, 229 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D. Mass. 2002)

. . . . § 648.55(g)(1) & (2). . . . abbreviated procedure for adopting a framework adjustment to the Scallop Plan is codified at 50 C.F.R. § 648.55 . . .

C. J. TOWER SONS OF BUFFALO, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 520 F. Supp. 1211 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

. . . 666.10, TSUS, certain cream separators, item 661.85, agricultural or horticultural hoes and rakes, item 648.55 . . .

C. J. v., 1 Ct. Int'l Trade 257 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

. . . 666.10, TSUS, certain cream separators, item 661.85, agricultural or horticultural hoes, rakes, item 648.55 . . .

BORDER BROKERAGE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 343 F. Supp. 1396 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . Baker (Imports) Co. case that “[b]y including horticultural tools in this item [648.55], and in other . . .

v., 65 Cust. Ct. 277 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . Baker (Imports) Co. case that “[b]y including horticultural tools in this item [648.55], and in other . . .

S. Co. L. v., 61 Cust. Ct. 305 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . the subject rakes should be properly classified as “agricultural or horticultural tools,” under item 648.55 . . . all the foregoing which are hand tools, and metal parts thereof: # Hoes and rakes, and parts thereof: 648.55 . . . Are the rakes, as described above, agricultural or horticultural tools within the purview of item 648.55 . . . at the “Brussels Nomenclature,” we find a striking similarity between its heading No. 82.01 and item 648.55 . . . It was there urged that the words “or horticultural” be deleted from items 648.55 and 648.61, as the . . .

In SUSSMAN, 188 F. Supp. 320 (E.D. Pa. 1960)

. . . In their joint returns for the year 1955, each couple determined that they owed $4,-648.55 in income . . .