Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 8
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2006-01-11T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 923 So. 2d 442
Snippet: citations were inadmissible pursuant to section 316.650(9) of the Florida Statutes (2001). See id. at 783.…Accordingly, the district court held that section 316.650(9) of the Florida Statutes did not apply to the present…Dixon determined that the language of section 316.650(9) of the Florida Statutes (2000),[2] was unambiguous…elaboration that the language contained in section 316.650(9) that "traffic citation[s] `shall not be …First District appropriately applied section 316.650(9) of the Florida Statutes (2000), when it concluded
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-11-13T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 862 So. 2d 783
Snippet: appeal, Maddox argues that, pursuant to section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes (2001), the trial court erred…2002) ("Because the language of section 316.650(9) unambiguously provides that traffic citations are…evidence of the forgeries. Although section 316.650(9) does provide that traffic citations "shall… of this court as to the meaning of section 316.650(9). See Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-11-06T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 859 So. 2d 1224
Snippet: the forged traffic citations based on section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes (2002), and Dixon v. State, 812… 812 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Section 316.650(9) provides that traffic citations "shall not…District in Dixon specifically held that section 316.650(9) prohibits trial courts from admitting traffic citations…First District reversed, observing that section 316.650(9) contains no exceptions to its clear and unambiguous…legislative intent to make an exception to section 316.650(9)'s unambiguous language. Dixon, 812 So.2d at
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-20T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 863 So. 2d 334
Snippet: brokers. The brokers claimed a commission of $144,650.[9] Moliver refused to pay it. He reasoned that the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-15T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 870 So. 2d 18, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218, 2003 WL 21946474
Snippet: introduced into evidence pursuant to section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes (2002). The trial court also …), is entitled “Traffic citations.” Section 316.650(9) specifically provides that “[s]uch citations shall… of the absolute mandatory-terms of section 316.650(9),” the court concluded that the trial court erred… court exceeded the requirements of section 316.650(9) and the First District’s opinion in Dixon when …reference to the traffic citation. Neither section 316.650(9) nor the opinion in Dixon dictates such a result
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-04-03T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 812 So. 2d 595
Snippet: sought to exclude, on the authority of section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes (2000), the admission into evidence…issued to him. Because the language of section 316.650(9) unambiguously provides that traffic citations are… (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Nevertheless, section 316.650(9) provides that a traffic citation "shall not…contrary to the unambiguous language of section 315.650(9). Courts should go behind the unambiguous meaning…following the unambiguous mandate of section 315.650(9) will make convictions for forgery of a traffic
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-02-15T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 650 So. 2d 676
Snippet: citation as a result of the accident, and section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes, which prohibits introduction…and therefore its admission violated section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes (1990), prohibiting the introduction…evaluation should have been excluded under section 316.650(9). See Duval Motor Co. v. Woodward, 419 So.2d 303
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-09-12T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 437 So. 2d 761
Snippet: would ordinarily not be admissible, Section 316.650(9), Florida Statutes, as incompetent evidence as to