Florida Statute 658.94 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVIII
BANKS AND BANKING

Chapter 658
BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 658.94

658.94 Prima facie evidence.—The general ledger, list of claimants, examiner’s final report made at the time of the failure of the bank or trust company, and such other records of the office’s office relating to any closed bank or trust company, or any duly authenticated copy thereof, shall be prima facie evidence of the subject matter therein set forth.

History.—s. 4, ch. 28016, 1953; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 117, 151, 152, ch. 80-260; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 1, ch. 91-307; s. 1, ch. 92-303; s. 1803, ch. 2003-261.

Note.—Former s. 661.38.

F.S. 658.94 on Google Scholar

F.S. 658.94 on Casetext

Amendments to 658.94

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 658.94

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 658.94.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 658.94

Total Results: 3

Calamia v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-12-19

Citation: 686 So. 2d 1337, 1996 WL 726877

Snippet: 2d 935 (1974); Warden v. Marrero, 417 U.S. 653, 658, 94 S.Ct. 2532, 2535-36, 41 L.Ed.2d 383 (1974). I see

Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. Florescue & Andrews Investments, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-04-12

Citation: 653 So. 2d 1067, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3671, 1995 WL 170018

Snippet: GRIFFIN, JACQUELINE R., Associate Judge. We find no error in any of the issues raised by Appellant, Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (“Mercedes”). We agree, however, with Florescue & Andrews’ contention on cross-appeal that it is entitled to recover prejudgment interest from the date the debt was liquidated by the lower court’s judgment. Although unstated in the court’s order, the parties appear to agree that the lower court concluded Florescue & Andrews waived its prejudgment interest claim

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-11-21

Citation: 72 Fla. 379

Snippet: increased in the last year over the former by $165,658.94, while the expenses for the same period decreased