Florida Statute 672.202 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.202

672.202 Final expression; parol or extrinsic evidence.—Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a record intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented:

(1) By course of dealing or usage of trade (s. 671.205) or by course of performance (s. 672.208); and

(2) By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the record to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 43, ch. 2025-92.

Note.—s. 2-202, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.202 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.202 on CourtListener

Amendments to 672.202

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.202

Total Results: 7

Jeetendra L. Shukla, Individually v. Bp Exploration & Oil, Inc., A.K.A. Bp Oil Company, Petro Distributing, Inc.

115 F.3d 849

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 11, 1997 | Docket: 1972558

Cited 25 times | Published

course of dealing or usage of trade. Fla. StatAnn. § 672.202. Shukla contends that, under these principles

Tingley Systems, Inc. v. Healthlink, Inc.

509 F. Supp. 2d 1209, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34023, 2007 WL 1365336

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 8, 2007 | Docket: 28458

Cited 11 times | Published

statement of the parties' agreement. Fla. Stat. § 672.202. Thus, to the extent the parties properly introduce

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1992 | Docket: 1413155

Cited 10 times | Published

warranties are subject to the parol evidence rule. Section 672.202, Florida Statutes (1987) (UCC § 2-202), precludes

CH Robinson Co. v. L & M BROKERAGE CO.

344 So. 2d 894

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1977 | Docket: 1517789

Cited 2 times | Published

contradicted by parol or extrinsic evidence. Section 672.202, Florida Statutes (1975). We are concerned

Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C.

661 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95949, 2009 WL 3190459

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 2281928

Cited 1 times | Published

agreements that may contradict it. See Fla. Stat. § 672.202. Furthermore, the court determines the parties'

Shukla v. BP Exploration & Oil

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 20, 1997 | Docket: 73913

Published

course of dealing or usage of trade. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.202. Shukla contends that, under these principles

City of Boca Raton v. Gold Coast Construction, Inc.

410 So. 2d 174, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1982 | Docket: 64588068

Published

resulted in the shipment of incorrect pipe. Section 672.202, Florida Statutes (1975),1 did not prohibit