Florida Statute 672.202 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.202

672.202 Final written expression; parol or extrinsic evidence.—Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented:

(1) By course of dealing or usage of trade (s. 671.205) or by course of performance (s. 672.208); and

(2) By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-202, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.202 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.202 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.202

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.202

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.202.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.202

Total Results: 4

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-11

Citation: 610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

Snippet: are subject to the parol evidence rule. Section 672.202, Florida Statutes (1987) (UCC § 2-202), precludes

First New England Fin. Corp. v. Woffard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-10-13

Citation: 421 So. 2d 590, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 650

Snippet: this chapter on parol or extrinsic evidence (§ 672.202) negation or limitation is inoperative to the extent

City of Boca Raton v. Gold Coast Construction, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-01-13

Citation: 410 So. 2d 174, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18956

Snippet: resulted in the shipment of incorrect pipe. Section 672.202, Florida Statutes (1975),1 did not prohibit the

CH Robinson Co. v. L & M BROKERAGE CO.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-29

Citation: 344 So. 2d 894

Snippet: contradicted by parol or extrinsic evidence. Section 672.202, Florida Statutes (1975). We are concerned here