Florida Statute 672.302 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.302

672.302 Unconscionable contract or clause.—

(1) If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result.

(2) When it is claimed or appears to the court that the contract or any clause thereof may be unconscionable the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to its commercial setting, purpose and effect to aid the court in making the determination.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-302, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.302 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.302 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.302

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.302

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.302.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.302

Total Results: 14

Presidential Leasing, Inc. v. Krout

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-03-04

Citation: 896 So. 2d 938, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2694, 2005 WL 497152

Snippet: decide certain gateway issues and under section 672.302, Florida Statutes (2000), to have the court determine

Holt v. O'Brien Imports of Fort Myers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-11-14

Citation: 862 So. 2d 87, 2003 WL 22681423

Snippet: decide certain gateway issues and under section 672.302, Florida Statutes (2000), to have the court determine

Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-05-17

Citation: 526 So. 2d 147, 1988 WL 50148

Snippet: in section 672.302. The trial court distinguished Capital Associates because section 672.302 is not limited

Meeting Makers v. American Airlines

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-09-08

Citation: 513 So. 2d 700, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2172, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 590, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12157

Snippet: with the requirements of sections 672.316(2), 672.302, Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court properly

FOOD ASSOCIATES INC. v. Capital Associates, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-07-23

Citation: 491 So. 2d 345, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1611

Snippet: 1984). In that case we specifically found section 672.302(2), Florida Statutes (1983), to apply to leases

Garrett v. Janiewski

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-09-25

Citation: 480 So. 2d 1324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2223

Snippet: section 2-302 is codified in Florida as section 672.302.

Fotomat Corp. of Fla. v. Chanda

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-28

Citation: 464 So. 2d 626, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 525

Snippet: unconscionable at the time it was made. See section 672.302, Florida Statutes (1981). At the conclusion of

Capital Associates, Inc. v. Hudgens

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-08-15

Citation: 455 So. 2d 651, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 66

Snippet: commercial setting, purpose and effect... ." § 672.302(2), Fla. Stat. (1983). The contract between Capital

Credit Alliance Corp. v. WESTLAND MACHINE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-11-29

Citation: 439 So. 2d 332

Snippet: strike Westland's jury demand. Relying on section 672.302, Florida Statutes (1981), Westland argues that

Monsanto Agr. Products Co. v. Edenfield

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-11-16

Citation: 426 So. 2d 574, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 781

Snippet: conspicious, and are not unconscionable. Sections 672.302, .316, .719, Fla. Stat. The trial judge's refusal

Steinhardt v. Rudolph

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-08-17

Citation: 422 So. 2d 884

Snippet: (Second) of Contracts § 208 (1979); see also § 672.302, Fla. Stat. (1981). At common law, an unconscionable

Varner v. BL Lanier Fruit Co., Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-04-20

Citation: 370 So. 2d 61, 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 716, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14418

Snippet: unconscionable contracts or clauses is Section 672.302(1), Florida Statutes (1975), which states: (1)

Fleeman v. Case

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-22

Citation: 342 So. 2d 815

Snippet: contracts or leases. [6] See, for example, § 672.302, Fla. Stat.: "Unconscionable contract or clause

Mobile America Corporation v. Howard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-02-07

Citation: 307 So. 2d 507, 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 625

Snippet: Although not cited by the trial judge in his order, § 672.302, F.S. 1971, adopting provision 2-302 of the Uniform