The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a) ; see also Jovine v. Abbott Labs., Inc. , 795 F.Supp.2d 1331, 1340 (S.D. . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a) ; N.M. Stat. § 55-2-607(3) ; N.C. Gen. State. § 25-2-607(3); N.H. Rev. . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a). 4. Illinois Law. . . . Stat. § 672.607(3)(a) ; 810 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-607(3)(a) ; N.M. Stat. . . . Stat. § 672.607(3)(a) ; N.M. Stat. Ann. § 55-2-607(3)(a) ; N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 2-607(3)(a) ; N.C. . . .
. . . The notice requirement is found in Florida Statute § 672.607(3)(a), which provides that "the buyer must . . . Stat. § 672.607(3). . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2607(C)(1); idaho Code §28-2-607(3)(a); N.M. . . .
. . . Section 672.607(3)(a), Florida Statutes; (6) The injuries sustained by the buyer as a result of the breach . . .
. . . .” § 672.607(3)(a); see T.J. Stevenson, 629 F.2d at 359 (applying the UCC as adopted in Illinois). . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a), breach of warranty claim must allege notice to seller of breach). . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a) (emphasis added). . . . warrantor, there has apparently been some confusion over whether the use of the word "seller” in § 672.607 . . . If § 672.607(3)(a) requires that notice be given to the warrantor, it is undisputed that Plaintiffs here . . . did not do so; and if § 672.607(3)(a) requires that notice be given to the seller, the terms of the . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a) (2011) (“The buyer must within a reasonable time after he or she discovers or should . . . have discovered any breach,’ as is required to permit a recovery for breach of warranty under section 672.607 . . . Mar. 25, 2010) (stating that “[t]he parties ha[d] not cited to any Florida case extending section 672.607 . . . Given its conclusion regarding this issue, the court declines to address whether, under Florida law, § 672.607 . . .
. . . Section 672.607(3), Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part that "[w]here a tender has been accepted . . .
. . . Section 672.607(3), Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part that "[w]here a tender has been accepted . . .
. . . . § 672.607. . . .
. . . . § 672.607(1), which provides, “[t]he buyer must pay at the contract rate for any goods accepted.” . . . Stat. § 672.607(3)(a) (providing that, upon acceptance, a buyer must give notice of breach or be barred . . . Stat. § 672.607(3)(a); Nebula Glass Int’l Inc. v. . . .
. . . Section 672.607; clearly, this is an individualized factual inquiry, as some potential class members . . . Stat. § 672.607(3)(a) which provides that “[wjhen a tender has been accepted the buyer must within a . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a); Royal Typewriter Co., a Div. of Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. . . .
. . . . § 672.607(1) (“The buyer must pay at the contract price for any goods accepted.”); see also Fla. . . . Stat. § 672.607 provides that: (1) The buyer must pay at the contract rate for any goods accepted. (2 . . .
. . . . § 672.607(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . . § 672.607(1); see also B.P. Development and Management Corp. v. P. . . . Paragraph 2 of the Official Comment of § 672.607(2) provides: 2. . . . See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.607(4). . . . Mere notice under § 672.607(3)(a) is not sufficient. . . . See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.607(1). IV. . . .
. . . witness that condition not seen or heard insufficient to overcome positive testimony to the contrary). . 672.607 . . .
. . . . § 672.607(1), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3) and Official Comment 4 thereto. . . .
. . . notice of the alleged breach within a reasonable time after discovery as required by Florida Statute § 672.607 . . . Therefore, the Court finds that plaintiff was not bound under Florida statute § 672.607(3)(a), and his . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3)(a) (1985). . . . Regarding the absence of notice to the Defendants as required by Fla.Stat. § 672.607(3)(a), the Florida . . . courts have uniformly held that the notice requirements of § 672.607(3)(a) need not be complied with . . .
. . . In this regard, § 672.607, which relates to rejection of tendered goods (which, although permissible . . . otherwise; .Section 672.714(1) provides: Where the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (§ 672.607 . . .
. . . . § 672.607(3) and official comment 4. . . .
. . . . § 672.607 Effect of acceptance; notice of breach; burden of establishing breach after acceptance; notice . . . Stat. § 672.607(2). . . .
. . . Florida, Fourth District, which did not discuss the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code, Section 672.607 . . . privity of contract with the defendant must allege compliance with the notice provision of Section 672.607 . . .
. . . .— (1)Where the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (s. 672.607(3)) he may recover as damages . . .
. . . . § 672.607. . . .
. . . . § 672.607. . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.607, Official Comment 4. . . .
. . . accepted the tender, the burden of proof on establishing any defect was on the debtor pursuant to Section -672.607 . . . Section 672.607(3)(a) provides that where there has been acceptance of a tender of delivery, the buyer . . . Pursuant to the terms of 672.607(3)(a), Florida Statutes, the debtor is barred from any remedy. . . .
. . . Ordinarily, acceptance of the 55 doors would make Shreve liable for payment under section 672.607(1), . . . notified both Pac-Dor and J & D of the nonconformity within a reasonable time as required by section 672.607 . . .
. . . According to Dunham-Bush, this requirement flows from § 672.607(3)(a), which provides that a buyer who . . . the “buyer”, within the meaning of § 672.103(l)(a), then the complaint must allege compliance with § 672.607 . . . American Honda in the sale of the subject motorcycle, the complaint need not allege compliance with § 672.607 . . .
. . . Seaboard Coastline Railroad Co., 349 So.2d 1187, 1189 (Fla.1977); § 672.607(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); 3 Fla.Jur . . .
. . . . § 672.607(4), the burden is on the buyer to establish any breach with respect to the goods accepted . . . Fla.Stat. § 672.607(3)(a). . . . is clear that the Vincents did not notify Maas within a reasonable time as required by Fla.Stat. § 672.607 . . .
. . . The only other matter argued to support the judgment is that Lake had been “vouched in” under Section 672.607 . . .
. . . It does appear that appellee accepted the shipment and that thus under Section 672.607(1), Florida Statutes . . . nonconforming use within a reasonable time after discovery according to the requirements of Section 672.607 . . .
. . . the alleged breach until after destruction of the goods, York is barred from any remedy under Section 672.607 . . . Section 672.607(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), provides that “[t]he buyer must within a reasonable time . . . York contends that notice after destruction of the goods constituted reasonable notice under Section 672.607 . . . notify Paramount of the alleged breach prior to destruction ran counter to the purposes of Section 672.607 . . .
. . . See Section 672.607, Fla. Stat. (1977). . . .
. . . Section 672.607(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1975); 6) The injuries sustained by the buyer as a result of . . .
. . . such acceptance does not occur until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect them; or . “672.607 . . . Following the acceptance of a tender under Fla.Stat. § 672.607(3) (a), the buyer is required to notify . . .