Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 672.608 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 672.608 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 672.608

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 672.608
672.608 Revocation of acceptance in whole or in part.
(1) The buyer may revoke her or his acceptance of a lot or commercial unit whose nonconformity substantially impairs its value to her or him if she or he has accepted it:
(a) On the reasonable assumption that its nonconformity would be cured and it has not been seasonably cured; or
(b) Without discovery of such nonconformity if her or his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of discovery before acceptance or by the seller’s assurances.
(2) Revocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the ground for it and before any substantial change in condition of the goods which is not caused by their own defects. It is not effective until the buyer notifies the seller of it.
(3) A buyer who so revokes has the same rights and duties with regard to the goods involved as if she or he had rejected them.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 593, ch. 97-102.
Note.s. 2-608, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.608 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.608 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.608


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.608
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.608.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.608

Total Results: 20

Tm Wireless Communication Services v. All Commerce

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-16

Citation: 246 So. 3d 541

Snippet: whole . . . .”), or revoke its acceptance, id, § 672.608(1) (“The buyer may revoke her or his acceptance

Rastaedt v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-05-04

Citation: 63 So. 3d 41, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6323, 2011 WL 1661179

Snippet: accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d) and section 672.608, Florida Statutes, and to recover all monies paid

Giallo v. New Piper Aircraft, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-10-15

Citation: 855 So. 2d 1273, 2003 WL 22339295

Snippet: acceptance under the Uniform Commercial Code, section 672.608, Florida Statutes (2002), which provides: Revocation

Gulfwind South, Inc. v. Jones

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-05-12

Citation: 775 So. 2d 311, 2000 WL 571417

Snippet: "substantially impaired" the boat's value. See § 672.608, Fla. Stat. (1995). Additionally, Jones had to

Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-11

Citation: 610 So. 2d 597, 1992 WL 365476

Snippet: Smith's right to revoke his acceptance under section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1987). On September 2, 1987

BP Dev. & Mgmt. Corp. v. P. LAFER ENT., INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-02

Citation: 538 So. 2d 1379, 1989 WL 16644

Snippet: way of revocation of acceptance under section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1985). However, the revocation

Gardner v. Nimnicht Chevrolet Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-09-09

Citation: 532 So. 2d 26, 1988 WL 93056

Snippet: and revocation of acceptance pursuant to section 672.608, Florida Statutes. The deceptive and unfair trade

Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-05-17

Citation: 526 So. 2d 147, 1988 WL 50148

Snippet: seeking revocation of acceptance under section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1983) (section 2-608, Uniform

Maserati Automobiles Inc. v. Caplan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-29

Citation: 522 So. 2d 993, 1988 WL 26271

Snippet: necessarily inconsistent remedies."). Second, § 672.608 (comment 1), Fla. Stat. (1983), states that "the

Bair v. AEGIS CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-23

Citation: 523 So. 2d 1186, 1988 WL 24165

Snippet: by the U.C.C. provision codified under section 672.608(2), Florida Statutes (1985).[1] Applying that statute

McCormick MacHinery, Inc. v. Julian E. Johnson & Sons, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-11

Citation: 523 So. 2d 651, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 640, 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 51, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5861, 1988 WL 20585

Snippet: acceptance under the Uniform Commercial Code, section 672.608, Florida Statutes. In its final judgment, the trial

Hikes v. McNamara Pontiac, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-08-13

Citation: 510 So. 2d 1212, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1996, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9884

Snippet: effective until the buyer notifies the seller. § 672.608(2), Fla.Stat. See also Central Florida Antenna

CENTRAL FLA. ANTENNA SERVICE v. Crabtree

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-03-12

Citation: 503 So. 2d 1351, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 754, 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1397, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12037

Snippet: equitable remedy without consideration of section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1985), the provision in Florida's

Winterbotham v. Computer Corps, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-06-05

Citation: 490 So. 2d 1282, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1284

Snippet: hardware was also warranted. We agree. Section 672.608(1), Florida Statutes (1985) of the Uniform Commercial

Parsons v. Motor Homes of America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-07

Citation: 465 So. 2d 1285, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 576

Snippet: substantial impairment of value pursuant to Section 672.608, Florida Statutes. We affirm in part, reverse in

Tom Bush Volkswagen, Inc. v. Kuntz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-29

Citation: 429 So. 2d 398, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1176

Snippet: purchased, as provided under UCC 2-608 (Section 672.608, Florida Statutes), Kuntz now argues that the remedies

NORTHSIDE FIRE EXTING. SERVICE AND WELDING SUPPLIES, INC. v. Wilson Davis Ford, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-07

Citation: 426 So. 2d 55, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1174

Snippet: delivered upon discovery of the defect. See section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1981). Appellees then stood

Peppler v. Kasual Kreations, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-13

Citation: 416 So. 2d 864, 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 158

Snippet: "rescission" in favor of "revocation of acceptance," § 672.608, Fla. Stat. (1979), and "cancellation," § 672.711

US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. N. Am. Steel Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-07

Citation: 335 So. 2d 18

Snippet: revocation of acceptance provided by Fla. Stat. § 672.608, White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 8-1

Barrington Homes of Florida, Inc. v. Kelley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-10-29

Citation: 320 So. 2d 841, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 103

Snippet: sum of $5,226.66. This appeal ensued. Section 672.608, F.S. 1973, the applicable provision of the Uniform