Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 672.608 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 672.608 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 672.608

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 672.608
672.608 Revocation of acceptance in whole or in part.
(1) The buyer may revoke her or his acceptance of a lot or commercial unit whose nonconformity substantially impairs its value to her or him if she or he has accepted it:
(a) On the reasonable assumption that its nonconformity would be cured and it has not been seasonably cured; or
(b) Without discovery of such nonconformity if her or his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of discovery before acceptance or by the seller’s assurances.
(2) Revocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the ground for it and before any substantial change in condition of the goods which is not caused by their own defects. It is not effective until the buyer notifies the seller of it.
(3) A buyer who so revokes has the same rights and duties with regard to the goods involved as if she or he had rejected them.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 593, ch. 97-102.
Note.s. 2-608, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.608 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.608 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.608


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.608
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.608.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

TM WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. v. ALL COMMERCE, INC., 246 So. 3d 541 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . conform to the contract, the buyer may ... reject the whole ...."), or revoke its acceptance, id, § 672.608 . . .

DAVENPORT, v. THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. a, 661 F. App'x 997 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 672.608, and, even if properly pled, Florida law bars revocation of acceptance claims against non-selling . . .

EXIM BRICKELL LLC, a v. PDVSA SERVICES INC. a S. A. a, 516 F. App'x 742 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . .” § 672.608(1). . . . It is not effective until the buyer notifies the seller of it.” § 672.608(2). . . . Stat. § 672.608(2). . . . Stat. section 672.608, requiring revocation to occur within a reasonable time “after” the buyer discovers . . . Stat. section 672.608(2). . Comment six to Fla. . . .

ABSOLUTE TRADING CORP. d. b. a. f. k. a. v. BARIVEN S. A., 503 F. App'x 694 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 672.608 (2012). . . . Stat. § 672.608. IV. . . . Stat. § 672.608. . . .

In TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION., 838 F. Supp. 2d 967 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . . § 672.608); (5) Breach of Contract/Common Law Warranty; (6) Fraud by Concealment; (7) Unjust Enrichment . . .

RASTAEDT, v. MERCEDES- BENZ USA, LLC,, 63 So. 3d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 2310(d) and section 672.608, Florida Statutes, and to recover all monies paid for the vehicle. . . .

F. GIALLO, II, B. v. NEW PIPER AIRCRAFT, INC. a k a B. F., 855 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Giallos also alleged a claim for revocation of acceptance under the Uniform Commercial Code, section 672.608 . . .

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, v. GALAXIS USA, LTD. a GMBH f k a GMBH, a k a MBH, a, 222 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Section 672.608 establishes when a buyer may revoke acceptance in whole or in part: (1) The buyer may . . .

BLAND, v. FREIGHTLINER LLC, a, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Section 672.608, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

GULFWIND SOUTH, INC. d b a v. JONES,, 775 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . question the factual support for the judgment on appeal or that the trial court’s ruling expands section 672.608 . . . See § 672.608, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

FRANK GRIFFIN VOLKSWAGEN, INC. a v. T. SMITH,, 610 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . motion for a directed verdict on the count alleging Smith’s right to revoke his acceptance under section 672.608 . . . warranties, and against Griffin on various theories, including revocation of acceptance pursuant to section 672.608 . . . Section 672.608(1) provides: The buyer may revoke his acceptance of a lot or commercial unit whose nonconformity . . . the dealer made no promises as to conformity, and, absent the nonconformity required under Section 672.608 . . . Co-op. 1982)); Count V, revocation of acceptance, pursuant to Section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1987 . . . not to conform to the contract, and the buyer is able to meet the remaining requirements of section 672.608 . . .

GOLDEN NEEDLES KNITTING AND GLOVE COMPANY, INC. v. DYNAMIC MARKETING ENTERPRISES, INC., 766 F. Supp. 421 (W.D.N.C. 1991)

. . . Because Defendant accepted the gloves, the only basis for revoking that acceptance is pursuant to § 672.608 . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.608 provides in pertinent part: (1) The buyer may revoke his acceptance of a lot . . . appears to concede that it accepted the goods but intended to revoke that acceptance pursuant to § 672.608 . . . Section 672.608 provides that revocation of acceptance is not effective until the buyer notifies the . . . As previously noted, the notice requirement under § 672.608(2) is more stringent than that of § 672.607 . . .

FAUST v. SUNRISE NISSAN OF ORANGE PARK, INC., 40 Fla. Supp. 2d 111 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . There being no breach of an express warranty, Faust is not entitled to revocation of acceptance under § 672.608 . . .

B. P. DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. P. LAFER ENTERPRISES, INC., 538 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . rejection and any return of the goods thereafter must be by way of revocation of acceptance under section 672.608 . . . See §§ 672.313, 672.608, 672.714, and 672.717, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . Section 672.608 no longer speaks of "rescission”, a term capable of ambiguous application. . . .

E. GARDNER H. v. NIMNICHT CHEVROLET COMPANY, a Co. a, 532 So. 2d 26 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act (Chapter 681), and revocation of acceptance pursuant to section 672.608 . . . remedies otherwise available to the appellants in this case was revocation of acceptance under section 672.608 . . .

ROJAS v. VITALE, 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 1 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Pursuant to section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1987), the buyer is entitled to revoke his acceptance . . .

L. SELLERS H. v. FRANK GRIFFIN AMC JEEP, INC., 526 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . the sole ground that the subject transaction is a closed-end lease, not a sale, and that both section 672.608 . . . The court ruled that neither section 672.608 nor the Magnuson-Moss Act applies to a closed-end lease . . . UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE The UCC provisions for revocation of acceptance contained in section 672.608 . . . Appellants argue that section 672.608 is applicable to this lease transaction because section 672.102 . . . By its express terms, chapter 672 applies to “sales” and section 672.608 applies to transactions involving . . .

MASERATI AUTOMOBILES INCORPORATED S. P. A. v. CAPLAN,, 522 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Second, § 672.608 (comment 1), Fla.Stat. (1983), states that "the buyer is no longer required to elect . . .

BAIR d b a v. A. E. G. I. S. CORPORATION d b a, 523 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . acceptance of the system within a reasonable time as required by the U.C.C. provision codified under section 672.608 . . . two-year delay in revoking acceptance of the boat was not a reasonable time as required under section 672.608 . . . Section 672.608(3), Florida Statutes (1985) provides that “[a] buyer who so revokes has the same rights . . . Section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1985), provides in pertinent part: (2) Revocation of acceptance must . . . section 85-2-608, Arkansas Statutes Annotated, which contains language identical to that of section 672.608 . . .

McCORMICK MACHINERY, INC. v. JULIAN E. JOHNSON SONS, INC., 523 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Florida, provides that a buyer may revoke acceptance of goods under certain conditions, as follows: 672.608 . . .

HIKES, v. McNAMARA PONTIAC, INC., 510 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 672.608(2), Fla.Stat. See also Central Florida Antenna Service v. . . .

B. NYQUIST v. RANDALL,, 819 F.2d 1014 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 672.608, which provides under certain circumstances that "[t]he buyer may revoke his acceptance of . . .

CENTRAL FLORIDA ANTENNA SERVICE, INCORPORATED, v. A. M. CRABTREE, Jr., 503 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The court granted this equitable remedy without consideration of section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1985 . . . Neither the final judgment nor the evidence indicate compliance with section 672.608. . . . However, section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1985) entitled “Revocation of Acceptance,” is controlling . . . Rescission in the context of this case is reworded by the UCC in section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1985 . . . Thereafter, section 672.608 limited and controlled his ability to revoke his acceptance. . . .

M. WINTERBOTHAM, III, v. COMPUTER CORPS, INC., 490 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 672.608(1), Florida Statutes (1985) of the Uniform Commercial Code provides as follows: Revocation . . . Kelley, 320 So.2d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), the court held that, under section 672.608, “value” to the . . .

KOSEN v. CURTIS FIELD, INC., 18 Fla. Supp. 2d 18 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1986)

. . . . § 672.608, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . There is no question that Plaintiffs’ revocation of acceptance was both timely and effective. § 672.608 . . . acceptance has the same rights and duties with regard to the goods involved as if he had rejected them. § 672.608 . . .

EUROWORLD OF CALIFORNIA, INC. a v. BLAKEY, d b a, 613 F. Supp. 129 (S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 672.608 states: Revocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers . . .

E. PARSONS G. v. MOTOR HOMES OF AMERICA, INC., 465 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . court erred in finding there was not a showing of substantial impairment of value pursuant to Section 672.608 . . . The Comment to U.C.C. § 2-608 (Section 672.608, Florida Statutes) explains the change in a buyer’s remedies . . . replevin — Section 672.716; (4) rejection — Section 672.601; (5) revocation of acceptance — Section 672.608 . . . An action for revocation is governed by Section 672.608, Florida Statutes. . . . , Fla.Stat. (1981), provides: 672.608 Revocation of acceptance in whole or in part.— (1)The buyer may . . .

ROYAL TYPEWRITER COMPANY, A DIVISION OF LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. a v. XEROGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CORPORATION, a, 719 F.2d 1092 (11th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 672.608(1). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.608(2). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.608, Official Comment 6. . . .

TOM BUSH VOLKSWAGEN, INC. a a a v. C. KUNTZ,, 429 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Commercial Code, the right to revoke acceptance of the goods purchased, as provided under UCC 2-608 (Section 672.608 . . . permitted a setoff to an automobile dealer when the buyer sought rescission under the UCC (Section 672.608 . . .

NORTHSIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE AND WELDING SUPPLIES, INC. a J. v. WILSON DAVIS FORD, INC. a a, 426 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

G. PEPPLER A. v. KASUAL KREATIONS, INC., 416 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Uniform Commercial Code, while abandoning the term “rescission” in favor of “revocation of acceptance,” § 672.608 . . .

JOHN H. PHIPPS BROADCASTING STATIONS, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CO., 45 Fla. Supp. 82 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1976)

. . . The right to recover for the second truck is based upon Section 672.608, Florida Statutes, which, among . . . See Section 672.608(2), Florida Statutes. 7. . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a v. NORTH AMERICAN STEEL CORPORATION, a, 335 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 672.608, White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 8-1, states: “At the outset one should understand . . .

BARRINGTON HOMES OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a v. E. KELLEY J., 320 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Section 672.608, F.S.1973, the applicable provision of the Uniform Commercial Code, provides as follows . . . the “value” of the goods has been “substantially impaired” as to him within the contemplation of § 672.608 . . .