Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 672.615 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 672.615 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 672.615 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 672.615

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 672.615
672.615 Excuse by failure of presupposed conditions.Except so far as a seller may have assumed a greater obligation and subject to the preceding section on substituted performance:
(1) Delay in delivery or nondelivery in whole or in part by a seller who complies with subsections (2) and (3) is not a breach of her or his duty under a contract for sale if performance as agreed has been made impracticable by the occurrence of a contingency the nonoccurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made or by compliance in good faith with any applicable foreign or domestic governmental regulation or order whether or not it later proves to be invalid.
(2) Where the causes mentioned in subsection (1) affect only a part of the seller’s capacity to perform, the seller must allocate production and deliveries among her or his customers but may at her or his option include regular customers not then under contract as well as the seller’s own requirements for further manufacture. The seller may so allocate in any manner which is fair and reasonable.
(3) The seller must notify the buyer seasonably that there will be delay or nondelivery and, when allocation is required under subsection (2), of the estimated quota thus made available for the buyer.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 599, ch. 97-102.
Note.s. 2-615, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.615 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.615 on CourtListener

Amendments to 672.615


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.615

Total Results: 4

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.

415 F. Supp. 429, 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 721, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15673

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1975 | Docket: 2099493

Cited 27 times | Published

specifically §§ 2-614 (F.S. 672.614) and 2-615 (F.S. 672.615). The former does not require notice while the

City of Key West v. RLJS CORP.

537 So. 2d 641, 1989 WL 135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1989 | Docket: 427290

Cited 4 times | Published

by claiming commercial impracticability. See § 672.615, Fla. Stat. (1987) ("Excuse by failure of presupposed

Pendelton v. Witcoski

836 So. 2d 1025, 2002 WL 31641519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 2002 | Docket: 1745696

Cited 3 times | Published

basic assumption on which the contract was made." § 672.615(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). Section 266 of the Restatement

Tandy Corp. v. Eisenberg

488 So. 2d 927, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1259, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1986 | Docket: 64619523

Published

impracticability as contained in Florida Statutes, § 672.615, asserted by Defendant is not applicable to this