Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 673.1101 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 673.1101 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 673.1101

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 673
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 673.1101
673.1101 Identification of person to whom instrument is payable.
(1) The person to whom an instrument is initially payable is determined by the intent of the person, whether or not authorized, signing as, or in the name or behalf of, the issuer of the instrument. The instrument is payable to the person intended by the signer even if that person is identified in the instrument by a name or other identification that is not that of the intended person. If more than one person signs in the name or behalf of the issuer of an instrument and all the signers do not intend the same person as payee, the instrument is payable to any person intended by one or more of the signers.
(2) If the signature of the issuer of an instrument is made by automated means, such as a check-writing machine, the payee of the instrument is determined by the intent of the person who supplied the name or identification of the payee, whether or not authorized to do so.
(3) A person to whom an instrument is payable may be identified in any way, including by name, identifying number, office, or account number. For the purpose of determining the holder of an instrument, the following rules apply:
(a) If an instrument is payable to an account and the account is identified only by number, the instrument is payable to the person to whom the account is payable. If an instrument is payable to an account identified by number and by the name of a person, the instrument is payable to the named person, whether or not that person is the owner of the account identified by number.
(b) If an instrument is payable to:
1. A trust, an estate, or a person described as trustee or representative of a trust or estate, the instrument is payable to the trustee, the representative, or a successor of either, whether or not the beneficiary or estate is also named;
2. A person described as agent or similar representative of a named or identified person, the instrument is payable to the represented person, the representative, or a successor of the representative;
3. A fund or organization that is not a legal entity, the instrument is payable to a representative of the members of the fund or organization; or
4. An office or a person described as holding an office, the instrument is payable to the named person, the incumbent of the office, or a successor to the incumbent.
(4) If an instrument is payable to two or more persons alternatively, it is payable to any of them and may be negotiated, discharged, or enforced by any or all of them in possession of the instrument. If an instrument is payable to two or more persons not alternatively, it is payable to all of them and may be negotiated, discharged, or enforced only by all of them. If an instrument payable to two or more persons is ambiguous as to whether it is payable to the persons alternatively, the instrument is payable to the persons alternatively.
History.s. 2, ch. 92-82.

F.S. 673.1101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 673.1101 on Casetext

Amendments to 673.1101


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 673.1101
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 673.1101.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 673.1101

Total Results: 6

EXPERT INSPECTIONS, LLC v. UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: signature of both the assignee and the insured. See § 673.1101(4), Fla. Stat (2018) (“If an instrument is payable

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, etc. v. CHRISTOPHER HARRIS a/k/a CHRISTOPHER E. HARRIS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 264 So. 3d 186

Snippet: together with any indorsements or allonges. Section 673.1101, Florida Statutes (2017), provides that: … the beneficiary or estate is also named[.] § 673.1101(3)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (emphases added). We have

Verizzo v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-06-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 220 So. 3d 1262, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8921

Snippet: of a note that had not been negotiated. See §§ 673.1101(1) (identifying the party to whom an instrument…second indorsement or as a successor trustee. See § 673.1101(3)(b)(1) (indicating that holder-ship of a note

ISRA HOMES, INC. v. Appley

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 78 So. 3d 724, 2012 WL 337007, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1404

Snippet: discharged, or enforced only by all of them. § 673.1101(4) (emphasis added). The documents cited in this…Appellees only constituted some of the payees, section 673.1101(4) prevented them from seeking assignment of rents

Lucas v. Bankatlantic

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-04-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 924 So. 2d 959, 59 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 346, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 2006 WL 862903

Snippet: signing as ... the issuer of the instrument.” § 673.1101(1), Florida Statutes (2004). As the issuer of

Hyatt Corp. v. PALM BEACH NAT. BANK

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-02-04T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 840 So. 2d 300

Snippet: its enactment of Section 673.1101, Florida Statutes (1992). Section 673.1101(4) now provides the following… defense. The bank answered and raised Section 673.1101(4), Florida Statutes (1993) as an affirmative …alternatively or jointly, and thus under Section 673.1101(4), Florida Statutes, the checks would be construed… and not alternatively, and thus under Section 673.1101, the checks could only be negotiated by endorsement…Judgment in favor of the bank, finding that Section 673.1101(4) precluded the bank's liability. Hyatt appealed