The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . JTM has failed to state a claim for relief under section 674.402, Florida Statutes (1993) because that . . . Section 674.402(2) provides that a bank is liable for wrongful dishonor of an item drawn on the customer . . . Thus, JTM has failed to state a claim for relief under section 674.402 because it does not apply to cashier . . . Section 674.402(2) provides: A payor bank is liable to its customer lor damages proximately caused by . . .
. . . its amended complaint, Streicher alleged breach of a depository contract and violation of sections 674.402 . . .
. . . defendant bank on that portion of Appellant’s claim founded on a theory of wrongful dishonor under section 674.402 . . .
. . . Plaintiff) for the Defendant’s First American Bank & Trust Company (FABT) violation of Florida Statutes §§ 674.402 . . . FABT wrongfully dishonored the Debtor’s checks, in violation of Florida Statutes § 674.402, ruining the . . . Fla.Stat. § 674.402. . . . Many courts analyzing U.C.C. 4-402, which Florida Statute § 674.402 codifies, have held that a Plaintiff . . . result since Vlock and the Zahns might not have a cause of action against FABT under Florida Statutes § 674.402 . . .
. . . concerns whether an individual corporate stockholder has a cause of action against a bank under section 674.402 . . . That relationship, in turn, is the subject of section 674.402. . . . Section 674.402 provides: A payor bank is liable to its customer for damages proximately caused by the . . . We choose to adhere to the more literal interpretation of section 674.402, which follows the interpretation . . . Although the language of section 4-402 is identical to that of section 674.402,. we choose to disagree . . .