Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 679.3131 (2025)
When possession by or delivery to secured party perfects security interest without filing.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
679.3131 When possession by or delivery to secured party perfects security interest without filing.—
(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2), a secured party may perfect a security interest in goods, instruments, negotiable tangible documents, or tangible money by taking possession of the collateral. A secured party may perfect a security interest in certificated securities by taking delivery of the certificated securities under s. 678.3011.
(2) With respect to goods covered by a certificate of title issued by this state, a secured party may perfect a security interest in the goods by taking possession of the goods only in the circumstances described in s. 679.3161(4).
(3) With respect to collateral other than certificated securities and goods covered by a document, a secured party takes possession of collateral in the possession of a person other than the debtor, the secured party, or a lessee of the collateral from the debtor in the ordinary course of the debtor’s business, when:
(a) The person in possession signs a record acknowledging that it holds possession of the collateral for the secured party’s benefit; or
(b) The person takes possession of the collateral after having signed a record acknowledging that the person will hold possession of the collateral for the secured party’s benefit.
(4) If perfection of a security interest depends upon possession of the collateral by a secured party, perfection occurs not earlier than the time the secured party takes possession and continues only while the secured party retains possession.
(5) A security interest in a certificated security in registered form is perfected by delivery when delivery of the certificated security occurs under s. 678.3011 and remains perfected by delivery until the debtor obtains possession of the security certificate.
(6) A person in possession of collateral is not required to acknowledge that the person holds possession for a secured party’s benefit.
(7) If a person acknowledges that the person holds possession for the secured party’s benefit:
(a) The acknowledgment is effective under subsection (3) or s. 678.3011(1), even if the acknowledgment violates the rights of a debtor; and
(b) Unless the person otherwise agrees or law other than this chapter otherwise provides, the person does not owe any duty to the secured party and is not required to confirm the acknowledgment to another person.
(8) A secured party having possession of collateral does not relinquish possession by delivering the collateral to a person other than the debtor or a lessee of the collateral from the debtor in the ordinary course of the debtor’s business if the person was instructed before the delivery or is instructed contemporaneously with the delivery:
(a) To hold possession of the collateral for the secured party’s benefit; or
(b) To redeliver the collateral to the secured party.
(9) A secured party does not relinquish possession, even if a delivery under subsection (8) violates the rights of a debtor. A person to whom collateral is delivered under subsection (8) does not owe any duty to the secured party and is not required to confirm the delivery to another person unless the person otherwise agrees or law other than this chapter otherwise provides.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 2008–2016 · leading case: Bank of Am., N. A. v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 908 F. Supp. 2d 60 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
Bank of Am., N. A. v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 908 F. Supp. 2d 60 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “at 10 (citing Fla. Stat. Ann. § 679.3131 , comment 9; 4 James J.”
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rolando Perez, Juan G. Guerra, Esperanza Medina, LaSalle, Bank, N.A., & U.S. Bank, N.A., 165 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). “ainst the assignor and debtor with respect to the collateral — when (a) value has been given, (b) the assignor has rights in the collateral or the power to transfer rights in the collateral to a secured party, and (c) the assignor has either “authenticated a security agreement…”
Charlotte Dev. Partners, LLC v. Tricom Pictures & Prods., Inc., 33 So. 3d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). “Attorney Klein’s subsequent receipt of the money was not tantamount to Charlotte Development taking possession of the collateral under section 679.3131(3), Florida Statutes (2008).”
In Re Royal West Props., Inc., 441 B.R. 158 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2010). “3121 (1), or have possession of the original Mortgage Note which perfects the security interest under Fla. Stat. § 679.3131 (1). A perfected security interest in the Mortgage Note automatically perfects a security interest in the corresponding Mortgage under Fla.”
Hennessey Capital SE, LLC v. David (In Re Miller Eng'g, Inc.), 398 B.R. 473 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2008). “See Fla. Stat. § 679.3131 5 . Historically, a landlord’s lien, "did not have to be recorded in order to have priority over a subsequently acquired security interest or lien.”
Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. (D.D.C. 2012). “at 10 (citing Fla. Stat. Ann. § 679.3131 , comment 9; 4 James J.”
In re Tuscany Energy, LLC, 561 B.R. 910 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2016). “] Under Florida Statutes § 679.3131(1), a secured party may perfect its security interest in money by possession.”
— 679.3131(1) — 2 cases
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rolando Perez, Juan G. Guerra, Esperanza Medina, LaSalle, Bank, N.A., & U.S. Bank, N.A., 165 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). “ainst the assignor and debtor with respect to the collateral — when (a) value has been given, (b) the assignor has rights in the collateral or the power to transfer rights in the collateral to a secured party, and (c) the assignor has either “authenticated a security agreement…”
In re Tuscany Energy, LLC, 561 B.R. 910 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2016). “] Under Florida Statutes § 679.3131(1), a secured party may perfect its security interest in money by possession.”
— 679.3131(3) — 2 cases
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rolando Perez, Juan G. Guerra, Esperanza Medina, LaSalle, Bank, N.A., & U.S. Bank, N.A., 165 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). “ainst the assignor and debtor with respect to the collateral — when (a) value has been given, (b) the assignor has rights in the collateral or the power to transfer rights in the collateral to a secured party, and (c) the assignor has either “authenticated a security agreement…”
Charlotte Dev. Partners, LLC v. Tricom Pictures & Prods., Inc., 33 So. 3d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). “Attorney Klein’s subsequent receipt of the money was not tantamount to Charlotte Development taking possession of the collateral under section 679.3131(3), Florida Statutes (2008).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.