The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 679.332. . . . Section 679.332(2), Florida Statutes provides: “A transferee of funds from a deposit account takes the . . .
. . . E.g., Florida Statutes § 679.332. . . . In this case, even if Florida Statutes § 679.332 did not answer the question, the Firm has a security . . . Absent the effect of Florida Statutes § 679.332, Armstrong Bank might claim to have a security interest . . . non-collusive transferee of the funds representing the Pre-Petition Retainer and that, under Florida Statutes § 679.332 . . . Florida Statutes § 679.332(2) provides: “A transferee of funds from a deposit account takes the funds . . .
. . . . § 679.332, an innocent transferee of money or funds from a deposit account takes the money or the funds . . .
. . . . § 679.332(2) (a replica of U.C.C. § 9-332(b)), which provides that “[a] transferee of funds from a . . . Stat. § 679.332(2). . . . Stat. § 679.332(2) after Debtor transferred the funds to it, the funds in its hands were no longer subject . . . that it received Debtor's funds free of a security interest, which it claims encompasses its Section 679.332 . . . the controverted funds the funds were free of CapitalSource’s security interest because of Section 679.332 . . .
. . . . § 679.332(2) (a replica of U.C.C. § 9-332(b)), which provides that “[a] transferee of funds from a . . . Stat. § 679.332(2). . . . Stat. § 679.332(2) after Debtor transferred the funds to it, the funds in its hands were no longer subject . . . that it received Debtor's funds free of a security interest, which it claims encompasses its Section 679.332 . . . the controverted funds the funds were free of CapitalSource's security interest because of Section 679.332 . . .