Florida Statute 684.0013 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 684.0013

684.0013 Grounds for challenge.—

(1) When a person is approached in connection with a possible appointment as an arbitrator, the person must disclose any circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to the person’s impartiality or independence. An arbitrator, from the time of appointment and throughout the arbitral proceedings, shall disclose any such circumstances to the parties without delay, unless they have already been informed of them by him or her.

(2) An arbitrator may be challenged only if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence, or if the arbitrator does not possess qualifications agreed to by the parties. A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by it, or in whose appointment the party participated, only for reasons of which the party became aware after the appointment was made.

History.—s. 14, ch. 2010-60.

F.S. 684.0013 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.0013 on Casetext

Amendments to 684.0013

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 684.0013

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 684.0013.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.0013

Total Results: 6

Gottfried, Inc. v. Paulette Koch Real Estate

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-03-07

Citation: 778 So. 2d 1089, 2001 WL 219138

Snippet: Proodian v. Plymouth Citrus Growers, Ass'n, 152 Fla. 684, 13 So.2d 15 (1943); C.Q. Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc

C.A. Hansen Corp. v. Aetna Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-19

Citation: 455 So. 2d 1329, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15025

Snippet: Plymouth Citrus Growers Association, 152 Fla. 684, 13 So.2d 15 (1943); C.Q. Farms, Inc. v. Cargill Inc

CQ Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-10-03

Citation: 363 So. 2d 379

Snippet: Plymouth Citrus Growers Association, 152 Fla. 684, 13 So.2d 15 (1943); Standard Oil v. Nickerson, 103

Davis v. Davis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-10-04

Citation: 123 So. 2d 377

Snippet: Stephenson v. Stephenson, Fla. 1951, 52 So.2d 684. [13] 17 Am.Jur., Divorce and Separation, § 792, 137

Connelly v. Special Road & Bridge District No. 5

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-03-05

Citation: 126 So. 794, 99 Fla. 456

Snippet: In Michigan Crown Fender Co. v. Welch, 178 N.W. 684, 13 A. L. R. 896, text 902, the Court in referring

Tate's Administrator v. Jones'

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1877-06-15

Citation: 16 Fla. 216

Snippet: at law for damages.” 2 Sch. & *240Lef., 347-8, 684; 13 Ves., 228 ; 1 Sugden, Vend., c. 4, sec. 2, 246-7