Cases from cite.case.law:

SKYLAKE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. NMB PLAZA, LLC,, 23 So. 3d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . convey in accordance with the provisions of this section or in accordance with the provisions of ss. 692.01 . . . convey in accordance with the provisions of this section or in accordance with the provisions of ss. 692.01 . . . Sections 692.01 and 692.02 govern conveyances by corporations. . . . only express exception to section 689.01 is for corporate conveyances made in accordance with sections 692.01 . . .

In CALDWELL, Jr., 457 B.R. 845 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . convey in accordance with the provisions of this section or in accordance with the provisions of ss. 692.01 . . .

PRO- ART DENTAL LAB, INC. v. V- STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC,, 986 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2008)

. . . P. 1.130(a)-(b); §§ 689.01, 692.01, 692.02, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . convey in accordance with the provisions of this section or in accordance with the provisions of ss. 692.01 . . .

DGG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. ESTATE OF CAPPONI,, 983 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . property in accordance with the requirements of either section 689.01, Florida Statutes (2004), section 692.01 . . . Section 692.01 provides that a corporation may convey any interest in real property by a document sealed . . . by the corporation’s president, vice-president or chief executive officer in compliance with section 692.01 . . . While conceding that the deed from DGG to the Capponis did not comply with section 692.01, the Grantees . . .

PADRON WAREHOUSE CORP. a v. THE REALTY ASSOCIATES FUND III, L. P. III, a J., 377 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 692.01 There is another reason why PWC’s claims fail. Under Fla. . . . As explained by the Third District, “any instrument executed in accordance with [§ 692.01] is deemed . . . I disagree, and conclude that § 692.01 applies given the evidence in this record. . . . First, the fact that the deed did not have PWC’s seal does not negate the applicability of § 692.01. . . . But even if § 689.01’s method is not available or somehow does not apply, § 692.01 is not limited to . . .

RADISON PROPERTIES, INC. v. FLAMINGO GROVES, INC. a R. F., 767 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . They contend that section 692.01, Florida Statutes (1995), does not apply to appellees, Allen R. and . . . They argue that the court erroneously interpreted section 692.01, Florida Statutes, because Kanaan was . . . Section 692.01, Florida Statutes, provides in its entirety as follows: Appellants correctly point out . . . that because the entire section of 692.01 refers to actions by-either a president, vice president, chief . . . Therefore, section 692.01, Florida Statutes (1995), does not apply under the facts of this case. . . .

OCEAN BANK OF MIAMI, a v. INV- UNI INVESTMENT CORP. a, 599 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 692.01 Section 692.01, Florida Statutes (1991), the controlling provision, was enacted in 1971 . . . The American decision made no mention of section 692.01. In a later case, Prezioso v. . . . Applying section 692.01 to the facts, which are essentially undisputed, the question is whether Ocean . . . Section 692.01 is a codification of the equitable principle that “[wjhere a prejudicial situation results . . . The practice described by de Villiers comports with section 692.01 and Florida case law which holds that . . .

TEMA INVESTMENTS, N. V. N. V. v. B. SOBEL a, 581 So. 2d 192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . §§ 689.01, 692.01, 692.02, Fla. Stat. (1987). . . .

PREZIOSO, C- P v. A. CAMERON, Jr. C- P M. S. B. I. C. Co- I., 559 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . However, according to section 692.01, Florida Statutes (1989): Any corporation may execute instruments . . . petit. rev. denied, 389 So.2d 1116 (Fla.1980), the court noted that the practical purpose of section 692.01 . . . and signed the subject mortgages in that capacity, supports the trial court’s holding that section 692.01 . . . Moreover, section 692.01 specifically addresses the right of third parties to rely on a corporate officer . . . Finally, section 692.01 was not relied upon by the parties in American or discussed in the opinion. . . .

H. ROTHFLEISCH, v. CANTOR, a, 534 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 692.01 Fla.Stat. (1985) provides that any corporation may execute instruments affecting any interest . . .

In PINES AT PUNTA GORDA PINES AT PUNTA GORDA v. GOLDOME SAVINGS ASSOCIATION f k a, 52 B.R. 616 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . This contention is based on § 692.01 Fla. . . .

P. v., 82 T.C. 592 (T.C. 1984)

. . . Sec. 6651(a) Sec. 6653(a) Sec. 6654 $10,482.48 $2,600.98 $524.12 $434.94 CO <1 CO 13,840.10 3,460.03 692.01 . . .

L. S. SNEAD, W. W. W. C. v. UNITED STATES TRUCKING CORPORATION, a W. W. C. a, 380 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The question remains as to whether Florida Statutes, § 692.01, as amended effective January 1, 1972, . . . That statute, in effect on the date of the formal execution of the lease here, provides: Fla.Stat. § 692.01 . . . The clear intent and purpose of Florida Statutes, Section 692.01, as amended 1972, is to allow third . . . execution of the lease extension was delayed until the following year, after the effective date of § 692.01 . . .

FLORIDA FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, a v. DENT G. P., 350 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . But that section expressly allowed an alternate method of conveyance— by Sections 692.01 and 692.02. . . . Section 692.01, Florida Statutes (1969). . . . not a vice-president whose presumed authority to execute a lease for a bank is derived from Section 692.01 . . .

EPSTEIN, v. DEERFIELD BEACH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a S., 280 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Hence, according to the Bank, the deed did not satisfy the formal requirements of either § 689.01 or § 692.01 . . . Corporate Seal” printed on the deed were sufficient to' fulfill the requirement of a seal imposed by § 692.01 . . .

CON- DEV OF VERO BEACH, INC. a v. V. CASANO M., 272 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . convey in accordance with the provisions of this section or in accordance with the provisions of §§ 692.01 . . .

F. T. Co. v., 13 B.T.A. 839 (B.T.A. 1928)

. . . of $300; for 1910, a loss of $675; for 1911, a net income of $496.15; and for 1912 a net income of $692.01 . . .