Florida Statute 695.01 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 695
RECORD OF CONVEYANCES OF REAL ESTATE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 695.01

695.01 Conveyances and liens to be recorded.—

(1) No conveyance, transfer, or mortgage of real property, or of any interest therein, nor any lease for a term of 1 year or longer, shall be good and effectual in law or equity against creditors or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration and without notice, unless the same be recorded according to law; nor shall any such instrument made or executed by virtue of any power of attorney be good or effectual in law or in equity against creditors or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration and without notice unless the power of attorney be recorded before the accruing of the right of such creditor or subsequent purchaser.

(2) Grantees by quitclaim, heretofore or hereafter made, shall be deemed and held to be bona fide purchasers without notice within the meaning of the recording acts.

(3) A lien by a governmental entity or quasi-governmental entity that attaches to real property for an improvement, service, fine, or penalty, other than a lien for taxes, non-ad valorem or special assessments, or utilities, is valid and effectual in law or equity against creditors or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration only if the lien is recorded in the official records of the county in which the property is located. The recorded notice of lien must contain the name of the owner of record, a description or address of the property, and the tax or parcel identification number applicable to the property as of the date of recording.

History.—ss. 4, 9, Nov. 15, 1828; RS 1972; GS 2480; RGS 3822; CGL 5698; s. 10, ch. 20954, 1941; s. 8, ch. 85-63; s. 2, ch. 2013-241.

F.S. 695.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 695.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 695.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 695.01

Total Results: 145

Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark

15 So. 2d 175, 153 Fla. 501, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 684

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1943 | Docket: 3274824

Cited 42 times | Published

February 2, 1942, in plaintiff's favor, now Section 695.01 Fla. Statutes, 1941, provides that: "No conveyance

United Contractors, Inc. v. United Construction Corp.

187 So. 2d 695

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1966 | Docket: 2517580

Cited 30 times | Published

applied under our recording statute. See F.S. § 695.01 F.S.A.; Sapp v. Warner, 1932, 105 Fla. 245, 141

United States v. Feinstein

717 F. Supp. 1552, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9869, 1989 WL 95024

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1989 | Docket: 1152054

Cited 29 times | Published

Stat.Ann. Section 28.222(2)-(3); Fla.Stat.Ann. Section 695.01.[4] Florida also maintains an adequate system

Crigger v. Florida Power Corp.

436 So. 2d 937, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1983 | Docket: 1701106

Cited 24 times | Published

, § 689.01, Fla. Stat. (1981). [9] See e.g., § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1981). [10] Downing v. Bird does

Hull v. Maryland Casualty Company

79 So. 2d 517

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1954 | Docket: 392857

Cited 22 times | Published

valuable consideration without notice by reason of section 695.01 F.S.A., which provides: "Conveyances to be

Gennet v. Docktor (In Re Levy)

185 B.R. 378, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 67, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 990

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 18, 1995 | Docket: 1766835

Cited 18 times | Published

virtue of the recording act, Florida Statutes § 695.01, an unrecorded deed is not valid and effective

Ruotal Corp., NW, Inc. v. Ottati

391 So. 2d 308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1980 | Docket: 1173859

Cited 16 times | Published

therefore was not binding on appellant, relying on Section 695.01 Florida Statutes (1979). The difficulty with

Cain & Bultman, Inc. v. Miss Sam, Inc.

409 So. 2d 114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1982 | Docket: 526555

Cited 14 times | Published

the same land. Under our recording statute, section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1979), this notice may come

Rafkind v. Beer

426 So. 2d 1097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1983 | Docket: 1283490

Cited 13 times | Published

notice and therefore entitled to priority under Section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1979). Actual notice of

Tri-County Produce Distributors, Inc. v. Northeast Prod. Cr. Ass'n

160 So. 2d 46

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1963 | Docket: 1403058

Cited 13 times | Published

v. Rhodes et al. (1828), 14, 134. [6] F.S. Section 695.01, F.S.A. [7] Tyler v. Johnson et al., 61 Fla

Chatlos v. McPherson

95 So. 2d 506

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1957 | Docket: 471080

Cited 13 times | Published

McPherson. The determining point is the effect of Section 695.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. (the recording statute)

Suntrust Bank v. Riverside Nat. Bank

792 So. 2d 1222, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144, 2001 WL 980818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2001 | Docket: 1735374

Cited 12 times | Published

consistent with its trial court position. [6] § 695.01 Fla. Stat. (2000) ("No conveyance, transfer, or

Feemster v. Schurkman

291 So. 2d 622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1974 | Docket: 1704806

Cited 12 times | Published

Association, Fla.App. 1963, 160 So.2d 46 and F.S. § 695.01, F.S.A. *627 In the case at bar it is undisputed

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, Inc.

964 So. 2d 261, 2007 WL 2710771

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 1261647

Cited 11 times | Published

creditor or subsequent purchaser. § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). Section 695.01(1) provides that a recorded

Holland v. Hattaway

438 So. 2d 456, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 1731842

Cited 11 times | Published

in this case. Florida's recording statute, section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (1981), basically provides

Schreiber v. CHASE FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N

422 So. 2d 911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 1739870

Cited 11 times | Published

relying *916 upon the Marketable Title Act, Section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1979), gave valuable consideration

Zaucha v. Town of Medley

66 So. 2d 238, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1394

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1953 | Docket: 1238415

Cited 11 times | Published

subject to the recording statute of Florida, section 695.01, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., it should have

Broche v. Cohn

987 So. 2d 124, 2008 WL 2663758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2008 | Docket: 1392986

Cited 10 times | Published

SHAHOOD, C.J., and KLEIN, J., concur. NOTES [1] Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes states: No conveyance

South Motor Co. v. Carter-Pritchett-Hodges, Inc. (In Re MMH Automotive Group, LLC)

385 B.R. 347, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 267, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 927, 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 242

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Mar 18, 2008 | Docket: 1452054

Cited 10 times | Published

recorded. South Motor cites to Florida Statute § 695.01(1), which provides: No conveyance, transfer, or

First Union National Bank of Florida v. Diamond (In Re Diamond)

196 B.R. 635, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 410, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 617

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 30, 1996 | Docket: 1758992

Cited 10 times | Published

AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY According to Fla.Stat. § 695.01, "no conveyance, or mortgage of real property

Bank of South Palm Beaches v. Stockton

473 So. 2d 1358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 1510559

Cited 10 times | Published

decision. DOWNEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1983).

Dunn v. Stack

418 So. 2d 345, 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1982 | Docket: 1289284

Cited 10 times | Published

notice as to a transaction which is prior in time. § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1941). Notice, of course, can be

Florida Power & Light Company v. Rader

306 So. 2d 565, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1975 | Docket: 1376664

Cited 10 times | Published

court concluded, apparently on the basis of Section 695.01(1), F.S., that appellant's failure to record

Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A. v. Weitzner (In Re Kavolchyck)

164 B.R. 1018, 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 233, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2521, 1994 WL 70110

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1994 | Docket: 1737090

Cited 9 times | Published

Property because it failed to comply with Fla.Stat. § 695.01 in attempting to perfect its interest; (3) the

White v. Weatherford (In Re Abrass)

268 B.R. 665, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 411, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1361

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2001 | Docket: 1488012

Cited 8 times | Published

under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a)(3)[2] and Florida Statute § 695.01. The Debtor contests all of these allegations

H & F Land v. Panama City-Bay Co. Airport

736 So. 2d 1167, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 264, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1047, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 264

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1999 | Docket: 1434171

Cited 8 times | Published

not subject to the recording requirements of section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1995), Florida's general

CITGO v. Florida East Coast Ry.

706 So. 2d 383, 1998 WL 64008

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 1682520

Cited 8 times | Published

easement unless FEC was "without notice" of it. See § 695.01(2), *386 Fla. Stat. (1995); Ruotal Corp. v. Ottati

Winkelman v. Toll

661 So. 2d 102, 1995 WL 539006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 532494

Cited 8 times | Published

that Florida has a notice type recording statute. § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). Parties engaging in transactions

Charter Executive Center Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Charter Executive Center Ltd.)

34 B.R. 131, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6018

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1983 | Docket: 1474985

Cited 8 times | Published

form of the promissory notes are identical. Section 695.01 of the Florida Statutes requires recordation

De Rochfort Co. v. Sunshine State Bank (In Re De Rochfort Co.)

22 B.R. 826, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3459

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Aug 24, 1982 | Docket: 1401610

Cited 8 times | Published

Clerk of the Circuit Court, as is required by § 695.01, Florida Statutes, nor was it recorded with the

Fong v. Batton

214 So. 2d 649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1968 | Docket: 1336414

Cited 8 times | Published

upon adverse ownership. The recordation statute, § 695.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A, has always been primarily intended

City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

114 So. 3d 924, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 322, 2013 WL 2096257, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1000

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60232017

Cited 7 times | Published

play in the context of the rule established in section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which provides

Rice v. Greene

941 So. 2d 1230, 2006 WL 3327665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2006 | Docket: 431518

Cited 7 times | Published

right of such creditor or subsequent purchaser. § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). In other words, "an unrecorded

First American Title Ins. Co. v. Dixon

603 So. 2d 562, 1992 WL 161618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1992 | Docket: 1739002

Cited 7 times | Published

documents relating to claims of interests in land. Section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1989), provides that "[n]o

Stack v. Dunn

444 So. 2d 935

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1984 | Docket: 1510702

Cited 7 times | Published

deposit on the lease he had earlier recorded. Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (1971), provides that

Buck v. McNab

139 So. 2d 734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1962 | Docket: 532728

Cited 7 times | Published

under the recording statute, Florida Statutes § 695.01 F.S.A., grantees claiming *739 under unrecorded

Suarez v. United States (In Re Suarez)

182 B.R. 916, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 4, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 572, 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2618

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 17, 1995 | Docket: 1814567

Cited 6 times | Published

was "recorded according to law." Fla.Stat. Section 695.01. *921 The main issue, the Court believes, in

Weitzner v. Goldman (In Re Kavolchyck)

154 B.R. 793, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 733

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 11, 1993 | Docket: 1440838

Cited 6 times | Published

of Broward County in conformity with Fla.Stat. § 695.01 et seq. (the statute governing the recordation

In Re Chateau Royale, Ltd.

6 B.R. 8

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 15, 1980 | Docket: 1090823

Cited 6 times | Published

recorded mortgage? The Florida recording statute, § 695.01, Fla.Stat., reads as follows: "No conveyance,

Flanigan's Enterprises v. Shoppes at 18th

954 So. 2d 758, 2007 WL 1342543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 1651706

Cited 5 times | Published

the purchaser is precluded from relying on section 695.01, Florida Statutes (2001) to avoid the release

Crown General Stores, Inc. v. Ultra Meat Market, Inc.

843 So. 2d 287, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1814, 2003 WL 361246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2003 | Docket: 1244071

Cited 5 times | Published

entitled to the protection of Florida Statute Section 695.01 which states: "No conveyance, transfer, or

Seligman v. North American Mortg. Co.

781 So. 2d 1159, 2001 WL 313597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 1292615

Cited 5 times | Published

The trial court's decision rested in part on section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1997), which provides in

Cohen v. Bellamy (In Re Shannis)

229 B.R. 234, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 135, 41 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 475, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 30, 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 976, 1999 WL 30838

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1999 | Docket: 1109421

Cited 5 times | Published

under Florida law, is governed by Florida Statutes § 695.01, which states: No conveyance, transfer or mortgage

Caribank v. Frankel

525 So. 2d 942, 1988 WL 44272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 2516513

Cited 5 times | Published

priority of liens on real property is governed by section 695.01, Florida Statutes, which deals with the recordation

Growth Properties of Florida, Ltd. v. Brown (In Re May)

19 B.R. 655, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11743

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1982 | Docket: 1781449

Cited 5 times | Published

interest on record. The Florida recording statute, § 695.01 Florida Statutes (1979) provides No conveyance

Freligh v. Maurer

111 So. 2d 712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1959 | Docket: 1727976

Cited 5 times | Published

title. The plaintiff-appellee insists that F.S. Section 695.01, F.S.A. controls and that appellant's failure

Desak v. Vanlandingham

98 So. 3d 710, 2012 WL 4746471, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16833

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2012 | Docket: 60312535

Cited 4 times | Published

(Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“The recordation statute, § 695.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., has always been primarily

Argent Mortgage Co. v. Wachovia Bank N.A.

52 So. 3d 796, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20132, 2010 WL 5391527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2010 | Docket: 60297844

Cited 4 times | Published

a “race-notice” scheme. Argent asserts that section 695.01, Florida Statutes, alone determines which mortgage

Fryer v. Morgan

714 So. 2d 542, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1998 | Docket: 461615

Cited 4 times | Published

Morgan's undisputed actual knowledge of this sale. Section 695.01(1), of Florida's recording statute provides

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NA

524 So. 2d 439, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 879, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 774, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 1988 WL 23644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 1701557

Cited 4 times | Published

See, e.g., the land record recording statute, section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes. [15] A "good faith"

McCall v. Barnett Bank of Columbia County (In Re McCall)

74 B.R. 666, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 933

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1987 | Docket: 1429056

Cited 4 times | Published

this Court held that pursuant to Florida Statute § 695.01(1), vis-a-vis Barnett, the conveyance by Warranty

Cunningham v. Haley

501 So. 2d 649, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1986 | Docket: 538127

Cited 4 times | Published

recorded." [2] Recording statutes, such as section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes, are generally held to

Hampton v. Hampton (In Re Hampton)

43 B.R. 633, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4738

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1984 | Docket: 1423867

Cited 4 times | Published

real property is unenforceable under local law, § 695.01 Fla.Stat.; and, that an unrecorded interest in

Leedy v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Cocoa

142 So. 2d 99

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1962 | Docket: 1514267

Cited 4 times | Published

defendant's claim of lien. The pertinent portions of Section 695.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., are as follows:

Cape Sable Corporation v. McClurg

74 So. 2d 883

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1954 | Docket: 1270461

Cited 4 times | Published

conveyances as to purchasers without notice. Section 695.01, Florida Statutes 1951 F.S.A. Tennessee Coal

Regions Bank v. Deluca

97 So. 3d 879, 2012 WL 3588021, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311994

Cited 3 times | Published

PARTIES’ ARGUMENTS Florida’s recording statute, section 695.01, Florida Statutes (2004), provides, in pertinent

Mayfield v. First City Bank of Florida

95 So. 3d 398, 2012 WL 3115140, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2012 | Docket: 60311211

Cited 3 times | Published

& T were not entitled to the protection of section 695.01, Florida Statutes (2011). On appeal, the parties

United States v. Ippolito

838 F. Supp. 2d 1287, 109 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1083, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41361, 2012 WL 812350

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2012 | Docket: 65978399

Cited 3 times | Published

notice unless the same is recorded.” Fla. Stat. § 695.01. Against this standard, the Defendant’s contention

Townsend v. Morton

36 So. 3d 865, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7711, 2010 WL 2218327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2010 | Docket: 2529393

Cited 3 times | Published

214 So.2d 649, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). Hence, the purpose of recording

Mukamal v. Lima (In Re All Star Mortgage Financial Corp.)

411 B.R. 774, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 31, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2342, 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 33

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 17, 2009 | Docket: 1647918

Cited 3 times | Published

support of their argument, the Defendants cite § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (2008) for the proposition that on

Crews v. Brannon (In Re Mabbott)

255 B.R. 787, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 117, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1488, 2000 WL 1827785

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2000 | Docket: 1786081

Cited 3 times | Published

lien creditor under Florida law. See FLA. STAT. § 695.01 (2000); see also Weissing v. Gerring (In re G

Grant v. Davis (In Re CJW Ltd.)

172 B.R. 675, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 188, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1521, 1994 WL 526035

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1994 | Docket: 1868313

Cited 3 times | Published

1990, mortgage was perfected. Pursuant to Fla.Stat. 695.01 a mortgage is perfected upon recording. This

Riley v. Grissett

556 So. 2d 473, 1990 WL 7629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 542761

Cited 3 times | Published

through an unrecorded, ten year lease. But section 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1987) provides that no lease

Antonelli v. Smith

556 So. 2d 1132, 1989 WL 146030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1989 | Docket: 542556

Cited 3 times | Published

ownership of the property under recording statutes. § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1987). Those statutes provide constructive

McCall v. Barnett Bank of Columbia County (In Re McCall)

58 B.R. 54, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6715

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1986 | Docket: 1820497

Cited 3 times | Published

Lowell McCall. Florida law is controlling. Section 695.01(1) of the Florida Statutes states: No conveyance

Kingsland v. Godbold

456 So. 2d 501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1984 | Docket: 1447045

Cited 3 times | Published

of Hoffman, Henry, Smith and Henderson. [3] Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (1983), provides: No

Bank of America, N.A. v. Kipps Colony II Condominium Association, Inc.

201 So. 3d 670, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2016 | Docket: 4111231

Cited 2 times | Published

play in the context of the rule established in section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which provides

Grant v. Grantham (In Re Eiland)

260 B.R. 301, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1775, 2000 WL 33255495

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2000 | Docket: 1825819

Cited 2 times | Published

where the real property is located. See FLA. STAT. § 695.01(1) (2000). Knowledge of or participation in a

Kapila v. Dye (In Re Schiavone)

209 B.R. 751, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 4, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 763

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 1431765

Cited 2 times | Published

544(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code and Fla. Stat. § 695.01, the Trustee assumes the position of a bona fide

Anderson v. N. FLA. PRODUCTION CREDIT

642 So. 2d 88

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1994 | Docket: 1529429

Cited 2 times | Published

was entered in appellee's favor. Relying on section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1991), which provides that

FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N v. McKesson

639 So. 2d 78, 1994 WL 202961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1994 | Docket: 1310288

Cited 2 times | Published

Co., 473 So.2d 1358, 1360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). Appellee argues, however,

McCall v. Barnett Bank of Columbia County (In Re McCall)

69 B.R. 975

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1987 | Docket: 1324471

Cited 2 times | Published

order on February 11, 1986, holding that under Section 695.01, Florida Statutes, Barnett's judgment lien

Richmond v. Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co.

430 So. 2d 571, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1983 | Docket: 2579290

Cited 2 times | Published

(see section 5698, C.G.L., 1927 [now codified at § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (1981)]); but, if appellees had knowledge

FED. NAT. MORTG. ASS'N v. Westmoreland

19 B.R. 130

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1981 | Docket: 1781308

Cited 2 times | Published

lien creditor. Under Florida's recording statute, § 695.01, Florida Statutes, an unrecorded conveyance or

Suzana Popescu v. Laguna Master Association, Inc., St. Michael Properties, LLC, Supreme Title & Escrow, Inc. and Fay S. Morrison

184 So. 3d 1196, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 229, 2016 WL 72531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026014

Cited 1 times | Published

certain conditions apply. 2 . Section 695.01, Florida Statutes (2013), provides generally

In Re Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp.

433 B.R. 401

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2010 | Docket: 1783256

Cited 1 times | Published

unless the same be recorded according to law." § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (2005). As a matter of Florida law

Menotte v. Leonard (In Re Leonard)

418 B.R. 477, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3501

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 1750948

Cited 1 times | Published

value and creditors upon recordation. Fla. Stat. § 695.01 (2009). The Warranty Deed is dated February 19

Bakst v. Corzo (In Re Corzo)

406 B.R. 154, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 166, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 4158

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 30, 2008 | Docket: 1066935

Cited 1 times | Published

Under Florida's recording statute, Fla. Stat. § 695.01,[4] a bona fide purchaser of real property takes

Sanders v. Thomas

821 So. 2d 1214, 2002 WL 1724043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2002 | Docket: 1236291

Cited 1 times | Published

conflicts with public policy as prescribed by section 695.01, Florida Statutes. Accordingly, McDonald, and

JMJ Building Co. v. Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. (In Re JMJ Building Co.)

250 B.R. 437, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 262, 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 728, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 736, 2000 WL 943806

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2000 | Docket: 1103257

Cited 1 times | Published

be recorded according to law . . . Fla. Stat. § 695.01(1). In order for a debtor in possession to claim

Pearlman v. National Bank

600 So. 2d 5, 1992 WL 83881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1992 | Docket: 539576

Cited 1 times | Published

was unrecorded at the time he took title. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). The trial court found that

FJ Holmes Equip., Inc. v. BABCOCK BLDG. SUP., INC.

553 So. 2d 748, 1989 WL 150091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1989 | Docket: 1258515

Cited 1 times | Published

one-half interest held of record in B's name. [3] Section 695.01, Florida Statutes. [4] See, e.g., Cain & Bultman

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Westmoreland

19 B.R. 130, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3232

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1981 | Docket: 65778138

Cited 1 times | Published

lien creditor. Under Florida’s recording statute, § 695.01, Florida Statutes, an unrecorded conveyance or

Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller, Hillsborough County v. Manhattan Palms Association One, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2025 | Docket: 70890044

Published

7 with section 695.01, Florida Statutes (2022), just like the Clerk

MORTGAGE ASSETS MANAGEMENT, LLC, etc. v. ROBIN KAPLAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2021 | Docket: 60330678

Published

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted); § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2020). “The recording of the mortgage

2000 PRESIDENTIAL WAY LLC v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FIRST BANKS, INC., and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2021 | Docket: 60108426

Published

Baigorria, 300 So. 3d 198, 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020); § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). Notice may take three forms:

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. CHI PENG TAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2021 | Docket: 59882198

Published

the property senior to First Magnus’s interest. § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); Argent Mortg. Co., LLC

JACK N. SCHLOSSBERG v. ESTATE OF SADIE KAPOROVSKY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2020 | Docket: 17415845

Published

securing it by 2006. Schlossberg also relies on section 695.01, Florida Statutes, which protects subsequent

B.A. MORTGAGE, LLC v. EDUARDO C. BAIGORRIA and SILVANA M. ELEJALDE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2020 | Docket: 17350914

Published

(Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (citation omitted); see also § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). As such, there are three

JACK TOWNSEND III, TRUSTEE v. C.T. BOX, TRUSTEE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2020 | Docket: 16834859

Published

(Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (citations omitted); see also § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (1998). To determine whether the

DAVID L. HARKLESS v. DAVID A. LAUBHAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2019 | Docket: 15897426

Published

same be recorded according to law. § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). This statute only applies

Onewest Bank v. Palmero

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988968

Published

3d 398, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding: “Section 695.01 is a ‘notice’ recording statute, the primary

Miami-Dade County v. Lansdowne Mortgage, LLC

235 So. 3d 960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2017 | Docket: 6171787

Published

lien pursuant to Florida’s recording statute. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). After the trial court entered

Friedman v. Mercantil Commercebank, N.A.

211 So. 3d 310, 2017 WL 621228, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2017 | Docket: 4585361

Published

was required that this order be recorded. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). 2 . In this

Harkless v. Laubhan

219 So. 3d 900, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2016 | Docket: 4556056

Published

unless the same be recorded according to law.” § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2011) (emphasis added). The right

Barton v. Metrojax Property Holdings, LLC

207 So. 3d 304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2016 | Docket: 4539045

Published

property, Florida is a “notice” state. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“No conveyance, transfer

White v. Greymar Associates, LLC

208 So. 3d 220, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2016 | Docket: 60258201

Published

and outstanding interest in the property. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Gabel v. Drewrys Ltd.,

White v. Greymar Associates, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2016 | Docket: 4486850

Published

and outstanding interest in the property. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Gabel v. Drewrys Ltd.

Bank of America, N.A. v. Kipps Colony II Condominium Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2015 | Docket: 3019487

Published

context of the rule established in section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which provides

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Clavero

201 So. 3d 72, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13040

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690028

Published

loan. B. AttorneyAn-F act Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (2005), provides protection

Wells Fargo v. Clavero

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2757121

Published

B. Attorney-in-Fact Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (2005), provides protection

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rolando Perez, Juan G. Guerra, Esperanza Medina, LaSalle, Bank, N.A., and U.S. Bank, N.A.

165 So. 3d 696, 86 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 565, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6716, 2015 WL 2078683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2015 | Docket: 2679361

Published

iteration, codi *705 fied within section 695.01, Florida Statutes (2008), largely preserves

Lauramar I Ltd. Partnership v. Mel Fisher Maritime Heritage Society, Inc.

132 So. 3d 1234, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2589, 2014 WL 784867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2014 | Docket: 60238361

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2012); Mayfield v. First City Bank of Fla., 95 So

Fidelity Land Trust Co. v. Centex Home Equity Co.

903 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2012 WL 5383092, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161170

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2012 | Docket: 65986324

Published

Subject Mortgage,” pursuant to Florida Statute § 695.01 (Count I); discharging an unrecorded assignment

Crews v. TD Bank, N.A. (In re Crews)

477 B.R. 835

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2012 | Docket: 65784249

Published

of Baker County in conformity with Fla. Stat. § 695.01, et seq. Plaintiffs nevertheless argue that they

In Re Royal West Properties, Inc.

441 B.R. 158, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 637, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 4902, 54 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 44

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 29, 2010 | Docket: 2056855

Published

chapter 695 of the Florida Statutes. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 695.01(1) (West 2010) ("No conveyance, transfer, or mortgage

Perez v. Rivas

36 So. 3d 896, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8189, 2010 WL 2292000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 320110

Published

statute that had been repealed. Before 1985, section 695.01, Florida Statutes, *897 included subsection

Corus Construction Venture, LLC v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp. (In re Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp.)

433 B.R. 401

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2010 | Docket: 65783515

Published

unless the same be recorded according to law.” § 695.01, Fla. Stat. (2005). As a matter of Florida law

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 4, 2010 | Docket: 3258040

Published

Stat. 5 Section 28.222(3)(a), Fla. Stat. 6 Section 695.01, Fla. Stat. And see s. 695.11, Fla. Stat.,

In Re Caldwell

457 B.R. 845, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 5494, 2009 WL 8390037

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2009 | Docket: 2068729

Published

Florida's recordation statute, Florida Statute Section 695.01, is to place subsequent purchasers and creditors

Morris v. Osteen

948 So. 2d 821, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 2007 WL 120043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2007 | Docket: 64849111

Published

title under the quitclaim deed. They rely on section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes, to support their contention

Pepe Coin Laundries, Inc. v. Catovest International, Inc.

820 So. 2d 947, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4978, 2002 WL 561919

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2002 | Docket: 64816287

Published

Laundries’ machines were located. We affirm. Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (2000), states: “No .

Hardemon v. United Companies Lending Corp.

746 So. 2d 1231, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17297, 1999 WL 1259054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 64792986

Published

from claims outside that chain of title. See Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes (1995); see, e.g., Koschler

Sims v. McClain

741 So. 2d 609, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12209, 1999 WL 728752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1999 | Docket: 64791080

Published

fide purchaser vested with superior title. See § 695.01, Fla.Stat. (1997). Sims nevertheless maintains

Green v. Rosin (In re Rosin)

248 B.R. 625, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1924

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1998 | Docket: 65782043

Published

544 of the Bankruptcy Code and Florida Statute § 695.01(1). In Counts V, VI, and VII, the Trustee seeks

Bancflorida v. Hayward

659 So. 2d 1329, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9414, 1995 WL 521193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 64758581

Published

Moyer v. Clark, 72 So.2d 905, 906 (Fla.1954). Section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1989) states in relevant

Smith v. Federal Deposit Insurance

61 F.3d 1552

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 28, 1995 | Docket: 64021646

Published

mortgage[s] of real property.” See Fla.Stat. Ann. § 695.01(1) (West 1994). . But see Ameribanc Savings

Anderson v. North Florida Production Credit Ass'n

642 So. 2d 88, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8655, 1994 WL 478666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1994 | Docket: 64750634

Published

was entered in appellee’s favor. Relying on section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1991), which provides that

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 21, 1994 | Docket: 3255640

Published

directly for utility services. In addition, section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes, provides: No conveyance

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. McKesson

639 So. 2d 78, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1994 | Docket: 64749512

Published

Co., 473 So.2d 1358, 1360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); § 695.01, Fla.Stat. (1993). Appellee argues, however, that

Mederos v. Selph (L.T.), Inc.

625 So. 2d 894, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10095, 1993 WL 393633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1993 | Docket: 64743565

Published

affect intervening lien holders without notice. § 695.01, Fla.Stats. The remaining issue is whether the

Lafitte v. Gigliotti Pipeline, Inc.

624 So. 2d 844, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9864, 1993 WL 383510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1993 | Docket: 64743111

Published

unless the same be recorded according to law; .... § 695.01, Fla.Stat. (1991). The act of recording an instrument

Hayes v. H.J.S.B.B. Joint Venture

595 So. 2d 1000, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1899, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1992 | Docket: 64666097

Published

With respect to conveyances by quitclaim deed, section 695.01(2) provides: Grantees by quitclaim, heretofore

In re Forfeiture of United States Currency in the Amount of Ninety-One Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Seven & 12/100 Dollars ($91,357.12)

595 So. 2d 998, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1894, 1992 WL 38346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1992 | Docket: 64666096

Published

valuable consideration and without notice. E.g., § 695.01(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). Section 695.11, Florida

Sullivan v. Woodward

582 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5574, 1991 WL 104638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1991 | Docket: 64659962

Published

purchasers for valuable consideration without notice. § 695.01, F.S. (1990). Since appellee neither alleged nor

Taylor v. City National Bank

575 So. 2d 730, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1466, 1991 WL 22552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1991 | Docket: 64656860

Published

1966); Moore v. Moms, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); § 695.01, Fla.Stat. (1989). Affirmed.

Martinez v. Kennedy Real Estate of Labelle, Inc., Pension Trust

565 So. 2d 399, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5937, 1990 WL 114716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1990 | Docket: 64652119

Published

“creditors” or “purchasers” of the property in section 695.01, Florida Statutes (1987), and the *401ward

Brauner v. Lamper

555 So. 2d 935, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 234, 1990 WL 2685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1990 | Docket: 64647598

Published

mortgage in favor of the seller by reason of section 695.01, Florida Stat*937utes (1987). That section

Venney v. Atwater (In re Berkley Multi-Units Inc.)

104 B.R. 452, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1396

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1989 | Docket: 65779870

Published

provision dealing with priorities of mortgages is Fla. Stat. 695.01(1) (1987) which provides as follows: No conveyance

Venney v. Arena (In re Berkley Multi-Units, Inc.)

104 B.R. 455, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1401

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1989 | Docket: 65779871

Published

sequences of rec-ordation, Florida Statute Section 695.01(1) (1987), which provides as follows: (1) No

Vinney v. Andrews (In re Berkley Multi-Units, Inc.)

102 B.R. 852, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1177

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1989 | Docket: 65779848

Published

and is mindful of Florida’s recording statutes, § 695.01, et seq., (1987), that is, that the first in time

D'Alfonso v. Vinney (In re Berkley Multi-Units, Inc.)

91 B.R. 150, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1389

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 65779638

Published

provision dealing with priorities of mortgages is Fla.Stat. 695.01(1) (1987), which provides as follows: 1. No

Blunt v. Brigety (In re Blunt)

80 B.R. 234, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 2205

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1987 | Docket: 65779490

Published

argues that it is entitled to prevail under Section 695.01, Florida Statutes, as a matter of law. On the

Konas v. Coastal Lumber Co.

496 So. 2d 868, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2153, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1379, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1986 | Docket: 64622620

Published

compliance with the Florida recording statute, Section 695.01, does not give the mortgage priority over the

Becker v. Effenberger

458 So. 2d 891, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2438, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1984 | Docket: 64608043

Published

was ineffectual against appellee’s judgment. See § 695.01(1), Fla.Stat. (1983). See also Moyer v. Clark

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 30, 1984 | Docket: 3258262

Published

of Columbia, or a foreign country." (e.s.) Section 695.01, F.S., in pertinent part, provides: "No conveyance

Great American Management & Investment v. Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A.

430 So. 2d 545, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1983 | Docket: 64596729

Published

entitled to the benefit of the recording statute, section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes. Notwithstanding this

Barry v. Ippolito (In re Savel)

29 B.R. 858, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6445

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 8, 1983 | Docket: 65778457

Published

are reflected in the public records. Fla.Stat. § 695.01 (1981). The Court further finds that as to the

Schreiber v. Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

422 So. 2d 911, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 64593718

Published

relying *916upon the Marketable Title Act, Section 695.-01, Florida Statutes (1979), gave valuable consideration

In re Collins

5 B.R. 56, 6 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 704, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 5132

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 14, 1980 | Docket: 65777763

Published

interests in motor vehicles) are analogous to Section 695.01, Fla.Stat., which is the recording statute

Diesel Tanker J. A. Martin, Inc. v. Key Biscayne Bank

242 So. 2d 727, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1971 | Docket: 64518166

Published

First Nat. Bank, Fla.App.1959, 113 So.2d 869; and § 695.01(1), Fla.Stat, F.S.A. Key Biscayne Bank has raised

Atod, Inc. v. Coleman

214 So. 2d 769, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1968 | Docket: 64507020

Published

for failure of Coleman to comply with Fla.Stat. § 695.01, F.S.A.; that the Sheriff’s action in putting

Nissim Hadjes, Inc. v. Costanzo

197 So. 2d 602, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1967 | Docket: 64500525

Published

than such common source.” * * * * * * Under Section 695.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., Hadjes would have

Cahill v. Chesley

189 So. 2d 818, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1966 | Docket: 64498014

Published

property and, therefore, was not protected under Section 695.01 of the 1963 Florida Statutes [F.S.A.], and

Bauman v. Peacock

80 So. 2d 365, 1955 Fla. LEXIS 3508

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1955 | Docket: 64486827

Published

notice by reason of said section 55.08 and section 695.01, F.S.1951, F.S.A. There is no merit to this