The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . improperly seeking to collect on the note where the mortgage failed to meet the requirements of section 697.05 . . . asserted that the trial court determined that the mortgage failed to meet the requirements of section 697.05 . . . mortgage' securing the note failed to meet the requirements of a balloon mortgage as prescribed by section 697.05 . . . See § 697.05(4)(b) ("This section does not apply to ... . . . Further, section 697.05(4)(g) also exempts “[a]ny mortgage granted by a purchaser to a seller pursuant . . .
. . . . § 697.05(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . the purchaser/mortgagor, contended that the note and mortgage involved did not comply with section 697.05 . . . concluded that the term of the note in question was five years and, thus, it was controlled by section 697.05 . . .
. . . Judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action is whether the provisions of the balloon mortgage statute, § 697.05 . . . We hold that the mortgage before us is a balloon mortgage subject to the provisions of section 697.05 . . . and counter cross-claim against NCNB asserting the affirmative defense of noncompliance with section 697.05 . . . Section 697.05(2)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1987), defines “balloon mortgage” as “[e]very mortgage in which . . . See § 697.05(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . .
. . . In doing so, Safeco failed to include in the mortgage the statutory legend mandated by section 697.05 . . . Pursuant to section 697.05(4), the Hudsons counterclaimed, seeking the return of all the interest they . . . See § 697.05(4), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . Further, neither section 697.05 nor the final judgment provide for or allow acceleration of future interest . . . Whether section 697.05 or the facts and circumstances of this case affords the Cadens an independent . . .
. . . In 1983 the balloon mortgage statute, section 697.05(2)(a), Florida Statutes, was amended to exempt from . . . The act in question did no more than exempt this mortgage from the penalty provision of section 697.05 . . . If the mortgage had been found to be in violation of section 697.05(2), Florida Statutes, then the court . . . The trial court therefore correctly applied the 1983 amendment to section 697.05, Florida Statutes, to . . .
. . . In Count I of the Complaint, the Debtor alleges that the Bank, a secured creditor, violated § 697.05 . . . Section 697.05 Fla.Stat. (1983) provides as follows: .697.05 Balloon mortgages; scope of law; definition . . . complied with the statute and substantial compliance is sufficient; (2) that the mortgage is excepted by § 697.05 . . . arguments and finds each without merit for the following reasons: First, the constitutionality of § 697.05 . . .
. . . The legend required by section 697.05(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), appears on the mortgage, but it . . . does not appear at both points that section 697.05(2)(b) directs it should. . . . apparently feeling that the mortgage as prepared did not meet the statutory requirements of section 697.05 . . . purview of the statutory exception regarding “[a]ny mortgage created for a term of more than 5 years.” § 697.05 . . . furnish, except that the mortgage does not set forth the legend in the exact manner required by section 697.05 . . .
. . . well-pled allegation that the mortgage was a balloon mortgage, subject to the provisions of section 697.05 . . . involved in the parties’ dispute was determined not to be a balloon mortgage as defined by Section 697.05 . . . the most reasonable interpretation of the phrase ‘term’ of the mortgage as used in Florida Statutes § 697.05 . . .
. . . Both parties agree that the primary legal issue for determination by the Court is whether Section 697.05 . . . A new provision, Section 697.05(5)(e), Florida Statutes, specifically exempted from the scope and operation . . . Based upon the foregoing, Section 697.05, Florida Statutes is inapplicable to the mortgage loan held . . .
. . . . § 697.05 Fla.Stat. (1977). . . . Appellee also alleges that Section 697.05(4) Florida Statutes (1977) predicates liability upon persons . . . note and mortgage, it is not liable for having failed to place the proper legend on the mortgage. § 697.05 . . . The mortgage did not contain the legend required by Section 697.05(2) and was not a first mortgage. . . . Section 697.05(4) states in part: Any mortgagee, creditor, bonafide holder, assignee, transferee, endorsee . . .
. . . involves a rather harsh application of the forfeiture provisions of the balloon mortgage statute, Section 697.05 . . .
. . . This is an appeal involving the construction and effect of Section 697.05, Florida Statutes, dealing . . . Davies, were not entitled to invoke the provisions of Section 697.05 to prevent the appellees, L. . . . Section 697.05(2)(a) provides: Every mortgage in which the final payment or the balance due and payable . . . Thereafter, the statute provides that the failure to comply with the requirements of Section 697.05(2 . . . The Cox mortgage does not contain the language set out in Section 697.05(2)(a). . . .
. . . American was usurious; and the note and mortgage violated the “Florida Balloon Mortgage Statute”, Section 697.05 . . .
. . . Moody discovered that the mortgage was a balloon mortgage and subject to the proscriptions of Section 697.05 . . . the mortgage was a balloon mortgage and was therefore subject to the forfeiture provisions of Section 697.05 . . . involve the unconscionable overreaching of a mortgagor who sought to invoke the provisions of Section 697.05 . . . Following default, a foreclosure action was brought and the mortgagor sought enforcement of Section 697.05 . . .
. . . She relies upon the provisions of F.S. 697.05 (1975), to sustain her position. . . . Section 697.05, F.S. (1975) provides that any conveyance given for the purpose of securing money is deemed . . . F.S. 697.05(3) (1975). . . . The issue to be decided by us is whether the provisions of F.S. 697.05 (1975) apply to this lawsuit or . . . execution of the note the appellee is bound by the provisions of the Balloon Mortgage Statute (F.S. 697.05 . . .
. . . Florida Statutes § 697.05(2)(a) requires that “[ejvery mortgage in which the final payment or the balance . . . Florida Statutes § 697.05(3) & (4) provide penalties for failure of the mortgagee to comply with the . . . These provisions do not apply, however, where the mortgage falls within the exemption of Section 697.05 . . . the most reasonable interpretation of the phrase “term” of the mortgage as used in Florida Statutes § 697.05 . . . Affirmed. . § 697.05, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .
. . . moved to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence and to apply the Balloon Mortgage Statute [§ 697.05 . . . We cannot agree. § 697.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. reads in pertinent part: “697.05 Balloon mortgages; scope . . .
. . . Section 697.05, F.S.A. . . . facts of this mortgage transaction warrant the application of the forfeiture provisions under Section 697.05 . . . fees because the following language was not printed or clearly stamped on the mortgage pursuant to 697.05 . . . Section 697.05, F.S.A., and that the mortgagee was thus precluded from collecting interest and being . . . Section 697.05, F.S.A. is clear and plain and that since the relationship between the parties is one . . .
. . . . § 697.05, F.S.A., the “Balloon Mortgage Statute.” . . . . § 697.05, F.S. A., and, therefore, subject to the penalties contained in the statute. . . . contain the required legend, and does not qualify under any of the exceptions provided by Fla.Stat. § 697.05 . . . Exceptions to the application of the penalties are listed in Fla.Stat, § 697.05(5), F.S.A.: “This section . . . Stat. § 697.05(5) (b), F.S.A. above. . . .
. . . and to entel-an amended final decree upon the complaint in accordance with the provisions of section 697.05 . . . and the counter-plaintiff in an action to secure forfeiture of interest payments pursuant to section 697.05 . . . He urges that the chancellor misconstrued section 697.05 Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is sometimes . . . The section is as follows: “697.05 Balloon mortgages; scope of law; definition; requirements as to-contents . . .
. . . 1917_ 143. 21 12-31-1917 Depreciation 416. 67 12-22-1917_ 368. 50 Balance_ __ 37,900.97 12-31-1917_ 697.05 . . .