The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (2010) (Equity) ("All mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity. . . .
. . . . §§ 702.01-702.11. . . .
. . . . §§ 702.01-702.11. . . .
. . . And section 702.01 provides that “[a]ll mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity.” . . .
. . . See § 702.01 (“All mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity.”); cf. ch. 55, Fla. . . .
. . . . § 702.01. . . .
. . . . § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (2012-2014); see Singleton v. . . .
. . . Beepots filed a motion to alter or amend under Rule 59(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., arguing that Florida Statute § 702.01 . . . The district court denied the motion, concluding that § 702.01 was not an intervening change in the law . . . Kirian, 579 So.2d 730, 732-33 (Fla.1991) (“Haven”), that the portion of § 702.01 upon which the Beepots . . . The Beepots then filed a second motion to alter or amend, arguing in relevant part that § 702.01 was . . . ’ contention that the court erred in denying their first motion to alter or amend on the basis of § 702.01 . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 702.01 provides, in its entirety, that: “All mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity . . . Stat. § 702.01. . . . Accordingly, § 702.01 violates the Florida constitution “to the extent it conflicted] with rule 1.270 . . . The district court’s order in this case disposed of the Beepots’ argument under Florida Statute § 702.01 . . . After determining that § 702.01 was not an intervening change in the controlling law, and that the Beepots . . .
. . . Finally, the inapplicability of section 702.01 to determine priority between competing mortgage assignments . . . Because section 702.01 does not apply as between HSBC and LaSalle Bank, HSBC’s earlier perfection of . . .
. . . .” § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . It found further support in section 702.01, which the court pointed out “[d]oes not provide that the . . .
. . . . § 702.01, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . See D.C.Code §§ 29-702.01(c), 29-703.03 and 29-704.04(a). . . .
. . . See § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (2010) (Equity) (“All mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity. . . .
. . . . §§ 13-3401,13-3407,13-3418,13-610, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 and 13-801 committed on MAY 21, 2002. . . .
. . . .] §§ 13-3601(A), 13-1204(A)(2), (B), 13-1203(A)(1), 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 and 13-801.” . . . .] §§ 13-1001, 13-1204(A)(2), (B), 13-1203(A)(1), 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 and 13-801.” . . .
. . . .” § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . . §§ 13-1203, 13-1204, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01, and 13-1801. . . . Aggravated Assault, Class 3 nondangerous felonies, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1203, 13-1204, 13-701, 13-702.01 . . . A.R.S. [§ ] § 13-1203, 1204, 701, 702, 702.01, 801 Date of Offense: 06/07/2006 Non Dangerous — Non Repetitive . . . apprehension of imminent physical injury, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1203, 13-1204, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 . . .
. . . . § 13-3401, 3408, 3418, 701, 702, 702.01, and 801. . . . . . § 13-1001, 2502, 2503, 31-342, 13-701, 702, 702.01, and 801. . 8 U.S.C. § 1101(43)(F). . INS Det. . . .
. . . in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-3401, 3405, 3418,1001, 301, 302, 303, 304, 701, 702, 702.01 . . .
. . . . § 702.01 (1998) et seq. . . .
. . . of Marijuana for Sale” in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-3401, 3405, 3418, 1001, 701, 702.01 . . .
. . . Arizona Revised Statutes Sections 13 — 1204(A)(11), (B), - 1203(A)(1), -1001, -3601(A), -701, -702, - 702.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 702.01, et seq. (governing mortgage foreclosures). . . .
. . . 13-1002, 13-3405(A)(2), 13-3405(B)(6), 13-3401, 13-301, 13-302, 13-303, 13-304, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 . . .
. . . conviction for possession of marijuana under Revised Statute sections 13-3401, 13-3405, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 . . .
. . . conviction for possession of marijuana under Revised Statute sections 13-3401, 13-3405, 13-701, 13-702, 13-702.01 . . .
. . . . §13-702.01 (West Supp. 2006); Kan. Stat. Ann. §§21-4716(b), 21-4718(b) (2005 Supp.); Minn. . . .
. . . Paraphernalia,” a Class 6 felony, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-3401, 3408, 3415, 701, 702.01 . . .
. . . Ann. § 13-702.01(E) (1993). . . . . This conclusion is reinforced by the legislative activity surrounding § 13-702(C) and § 13-702.01(E), . . . Ann. § 13-702.01(E) (1993) (emphasis added). . . . Ann. § 13-702.01(E) (2005) (emphasis added). . . . Id. § 13-702.01(1). Further amendments in 2006 preserved these changes, in effect. See 2006 Ariz. . . .
. . . . § 702.01, which requires the state court to sever any counterclaims from foreclosure actions. . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 702.01 (15th ed. rev.2005). . . .
. . . PH 404, PH 702.01 (2002); 22 Tex. Admin. Code §291.36 (2002). . . .
. . . . § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (1995) (“All mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity.”). . . .
. . . establishing the invalidity of the claim for this purpose is on the objector. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 702.01 . . .
. . . See § 702.01, Florida Statutes; Cross v. . . .
. . . . § 702.01 (1987). . . .
. . . establishing the invalidity of the claim for this purpose is on the objector. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 702.01 . . . general objection to a claim, which will not justify disallowance of a claim. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 702.01 . . .
. . . . § 702.01, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . While the statute requiring severance, section 702.01, Florida Statutes (1987), has been declared unconstitutional . . .
. . . Haven held that section 702.01, Florida Statutes (1987), which mandated severance of counterclaims in . . .
. . . . § 702.01 was procedural only and, to the extent it conflicted with a similar Florida Supreme Court . . . In reaching this conclusion, the Haven court stated: “the amendments [to Fla.Stat. § 702.01] were part . . .
. . . Kirian, 579 So.2d 730 (Fla.1991) addressed the constitutionality of section 702.01, Florida Statutes . . . Procedure 1.270(b), the decision contains the following footnote: Specifically, the amendments to § 702.01 . . . final staff analysis of the House Commerce Committee, that legislation amended §§ 697.07, 201.022 and 702.01 . . .
. . . decision under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.270(b) rather than a compulsory one under section 702.01 . . .
. . . Savings & Loan Association (Haven Federal) appeals a district court’s express declaration that section 702.01 . . . The trial court granted the motion to sever, finding the language of section 702.01 mandatory and that . . . The court held that section 702.01, to the extent it conflicts with rule 1.270(b), unconstitutionally . . . Thus, section 702.01 is unconstitutional to the extent it conflicts with rule 1.270(b). . . . Specifically, the amendments to § 702.01, Fla. . . .
. . . See § 702.01, Fla.Stat. (1987); Wade v. Clower, 94 Fla. 817, 114 So. 548 (1927). . . .
. . . . § 702.01. . . .
. . . See Compendium II at § 702.01 (“computer programs” should be registered as “nondramatic literary works . . .
. . . granting a motion to sever legal counterclaims from a foreclosure action under the authority of section 702.01 . . . Haven moved to sever the counterclaims for separate trial, citing amended section 702.01: All mortgages . . . Appellants argued that construing section 702.01 as absolutely requiring the trial court to sever the . . . Appellants moved for rehearing, arguing that section 702.01 as construed by the trial court violates . . . We find that section 702.01 is procedural in nature and that its language is unequivocally mandatory. . . .
. . . Plackard, 412 So.2d 415 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); § 702.01, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . See generally, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 702.01[2]; see also, H.R.Rep. . . .
. . . TRIAL AND SEVER AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM In this last motion, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant relies on Section 702.01 . . . Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff asserts that Section 702.01 is unconstitutional. . . . The Court on consideration finds that the part of Section 702.01, which requires the severance of the . . .
. . . See generally, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 702.01[2]. . . .
. . . nonpriority’ is not; although it is stated in the legislative history.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 702.01 . . .
. . . period is computed from the time the power is exercised if the power is a general power as defined in s. 702.01 . . . In the instant case, decedent’s power was not a general power of appointment as defined in sec. 702.01 . . . Stat. sec. 702.01(4) provides in part: (4) “General power” means a power exercisable in favor of the . . .
. . . . § 702.01, Florida Statutes (1975), provides that “[a]ll mortgages shall be foreclosed in chancery, . . .
. . . See. 702.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .
. . . . § 702.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .
. . . Sections 702.01 and 702.-02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provide two methods for the foreclosure sale of mortgaged . . . The first is a foreclosure in chancery with the aid of a special master (§ 702.01) and the second is . . .
. . . Part 702.01 of the Manual has, since March 30,1959, directed that every person taken into the custody . . .