Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-04-25T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 136 So. 3d 766, 2014 WL 1665835, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6138
Snippet: chapter 120 rulemaking to approve a plan. See § 373.709(5), Fla. Stat. Here, the Secretary did not address…under the more recent and specific provision (373.709(5)), the general provision (373.114(l)(c)) must give… a plan, because the more specific section, 373.709(5), excluded plans from “orders” and held plans to…the approval of a water supply plan, section 373.709(5) does not exempt rulemaking in all aspects of water…water supply plans — simply approval. See § 373.709(5), Fla. Stat. Thus, nothing precludes the Commission
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-16T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 85 So. 3d 1127, 2012 WL 879284
Snippet: Plan ("Plan") pursuant to section 373.709(5), Florida Statutes. We reverse the orders insofar…directly contravenes the plain language of section 373.709(5) permitting such a challenge if the plan, in part…party shall be subject to s. 120.569." § 373.709(5), Fla. Stat. (2010). Should an entity choose to …administrative challenge. The plain language of section 373.709(5), Florida Statutes (2010), states, "any portion…petitions for lack of standing. Again, section 373.709(5) provides an avenue for administrative challenge
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-09-04T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 679 So. 2d 1237
Snippet: expenditure and held that pursuant to section 381.709(5)(b) [now 408.036(5)(b)], competitors do not have…c) (now 408.032(1)), and that under section 381.709(5)(b) (now 408.039(5)(b)), existing health care providers
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-03-28T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 652 So. 2d 490
Snippet: order. § 381.709(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). In the end, HRS makes the final decision. § 381.709(5)(c), Fla.
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-05-13T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 599 So. 2d 211
Snippet: provisions of section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). Section 381.709(5)(b) provides that existing…review cycles only, and accordingly section 381.709(5)(b), severely restricting standing, is not applicable…legislature intended by the enactment of section 381.709(5)(b) to restrict standing in CON cases. AMISUB (North…meeting the standing requirement of section 381.709(5)(b). First Hosp. Corp. of Florida v. Department
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-11-06T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 589 So. 2d 351, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11358, 1991 WL 231789
Snippet: applications. SFBH petitioned under section 381.-709(5)(a), Florida Statutes, for an administrative hearing… nor the time standard contained in section 381.709(5)(c), Florida Statutes, confer any continuing jurisdiction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-08-21T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 589 So. 2d 310, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8207
Snippet: in a CON proceeding is governed by Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), which provides: Existing…in the case at bar, consistent with section 381.709(5)(b), focused on whether Humana’s short-term program
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-06-06T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 582 So. 2d 1193
Snippet: concur. NOTES [1] See §§ 120.57 & 381.709(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] We also agree with
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-03-28T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 577 So. 2d 648, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2825
Snippet: petition challenging the intended award. Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1989) provides, in part: …herein, is based on the provision of section 381.709(5)(b) that “a facility or program ” within the same…The legislature intended by creating section 381.709(5)(b) to restrict standing in CON eases. See Florida…argument was “contrary to the plain language of § 381.709(5)(b).” This is a permissible interpretation of the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-03-27T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 577 So. 2d 648
Snippet: petition challenging the intended award. Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1989) provides, in part: …herein, is based on the provision of section 381.709(5)(b) that "a facility or program" within…The legislature intended by creating section 381.709(5)(b) to restrict standing in CON cases. See Florida…was "contrary to the plain language of § 381.709(5)(b)." This is a permissible interpretation
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-09-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 566 So. 2d 917, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7002, 1990 WL 133222
Snippet: entitlement to comparative review. Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes, expressly limits standing… failed to meet the requirements of section 381.709(5)(b), its petition for a hearing was properly dismissed
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-06-18T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 563 So. 2d 181, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401
Snippet: effective date of Section 381.709(5)(b). Consequently, Section 381.-709(5)(b) was applicable to the proceeding…moved to dismiss the petitions, citing Section 381.-709(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1987) for the proposition…those petitions. The effective date of Section 381.-709(5)(b) was October 1, 1987. A savings clause contained… comprehensive legislation of which Section 381.709(5)(b) was a part provided that “no judicial or administrative…abated as a result of the provisions of [section 381.709(5)(b)].” See § 381.7155(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). Since
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-05-09T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 560 So. 2d 1367, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457, 1990 WL 63878
Snippet: effective date of Section 381.709(5)(b). Consequently, Section 381.709(5)(b) was applicable to the proceeding…381.709(5)(b), did not grant Memorial any greater standing than was provided by Section 381.709(5)(b) …that the department correctly applied Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes,2 in determining that Memorial…that Memorial lacked standing under Section 381.709(5)(b). The hearing officer agreed with Southwest’s…’s petition. The effective date of Section 381.-709(5)(b) was October 1, 1987. A savings clause contained
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-04-12T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 559 So. 2d 595
Snippet: time section 381.709(5)(b) was passed was "not affected" by section 381.709(5)(b). Florida Residential…St. Joseph was denied intervention. Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes, provides: "In administrative…Joseph as a competing applicant under section 381.709(5)(b), and thus, St. Joseph does not have a right …addition, St. Joseph lacks standing under section 381.709(5)(b) to intervene in the process by which Fawcett…the motion merits brief discussion. Section 381.709(5)(b), which became effective October 1, 1987, includes
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-11-13T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 553 So. 2d 229
Snippet: case HRS erroneously concluded that Section 381.709(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), barred appellant, …October 1, 1987, the effective date of section 381.709(5)(b), holders of CONs authorizing construction were… approved CON before the passage of section 381.709(5)(b), which restricted standing, appellant's
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-10-11T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 553 So. 2d 189
Snippet: for capital expenditures, and that section 381.709(5)(b) provides in pertinent part "that existing…Doctors. The hearing officer cited sections 381.709(5)(b) and 381.706(1)(c) and concluded that Doctors…orders are correct in that, according to section 381.709(5)(b), Memorial does not have standing to initiate
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-07-18T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 266 So. 2d 164
Snippet: ;amp; Casualty Co. v. Greyhound Corp., 258 F.2d 709 (5 Cir.1958); Feller v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-04-30T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 152 So. 2d 485, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3620
Snippet: took place. Rowe v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 709. “5. When the corpus delicti has been prima facie proved
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-10-14T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 115 So. 2d 93
Snippet: took place. Rowe v. State, Fla. 1955, 84 So.2d 709. 5. When the corpus delicti has been prima facie proved
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1951-01-29T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 50 So. 2d 539
Snippet: mortgages, notes, and cash on hand, valued at $70,709.05. Taking into consideration the foregoing valuations