Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 9
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-01-25
Citation: 948 So. 2d 609, 2006 WL 2883172
Snippet: in the case"); Gamble v. State, 877 So.2d 706, 713-15 (Fla. 2004) (holding that defense counsel conceding
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-07-13
Citation: 907 So. 2d 1231, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10808, 2005 WL 1631087
Snippet: claimed by defendant-appellant Alvarez, in pages 713-15 of the trial transcript.” This court has now received
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-03-26
Citation: 840 So. 2d 464, 2003 WL 1625338
Snippet: power to punish. Vinson v. State, 345 So.2d 711, 713-15 (Fla.1977); Montgomery v. State, 821 So.2d 464
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-09-04
Citation: 719 So. 2d 13, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11852, 1998 WL 640319
Snippet: the course of these transactions under section 713.15, Florida Statutes (1993). No such entitlement on
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-27
Citation: 455 So. 2d 1345, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2099, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15234
Snippet: judgment allowing Britt’s Inc., pursuant to section 713.15, Florida Statutes (1983), to repossess certain
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-07-28
Citation: 436 So. 2d 974, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22768
Snippet: section 78.01, Florida Statutes (1981). See also § 713.15, Fla. Stat. (1981). On the other hand, if, at that
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-06-04
Citation: 406 So. 2d 1079
Snippet: an idea they find morally objectionable. Id. at 713-15, 97 S.Ct. at 1434 (citations omitted). We do not
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-12-28
Citation: 353 So. 2d 657
Snippet: statutory right of replevin granted by Section 713.15, Florida Statutes (1975), "Repossession of materials
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-19
Citation: 335 So. 2d 362
Snippet: plaintiff should have pursued its remedy under F.S. 713.15 as part of its duty to mitigate damages.[1] The