Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 713.23 (2025)
Payment bond.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes: through the 2025 Regular Session (some sections already show 2026 laws)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
713.23 Payment bond.—
(1)(a) The payment bond required to exempt an owner under this part shall be furnished by the contractor in at least the amount of the original contract price before commencing the construction of the improvement under the direct contract, and a copy of the bond shall be attached to the notice of commencement when the notice of commencement is recorded. The bond shall be executed as surety by a surety insurer authorized to do business in this state and shall be conditioned that the contractor shall promptly make payments for labor, services, and material to all lienors under the contractor’s direct contract. Any form of bond given by a contractor conditioned to pay for labor, services, and material used to improve real property shall be deemed to include the condition of this subsection.
(b) The owner, contractor, or surety shall furnish a true copy of the bond at the cost of reproduction to any lienor demanding it. Any person who fails or refuses to furnish the copy without justifiable cause shall be liable to the lienor demanding the copy for any damages caused by the refusal or failure.
(c) Before beginning or within 45 days after beginning to furnish labor, materials, or supplies, a lienor who is not in privity with the contractor, except a laborer, shall serve the contractor with notice in writing that the lienor will look to the contractor’s bond for protection on the work. If a notice of commencement with the attached bond is not recorded before commencement of construction, the lienor not in privity with the contractor may, in the alternative, elect to serve the notice to the contractor up to 45 days after the date the lienor is served with a copy of the bond. A notice to owner pursuant to s. 713.06 that has been timely served on the contractor satisfies the requirements of this paragraph. However, the limitation period for commencement of an action on the payment bond as established in paragraph (e) may not be expanded. The notice may be in substantially the following form and may be combined with a notice to owner given under s. 713.06 and, if so, may be entitled “NOTICE TO OWNER/NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR”:
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR
To: (name and address of contractor)
The undersigned hereby informs you that he or she has furnished or is furnishing services or materials as follows:
(general description of services or materials) for the improvement of the real property identified as (property description) under an order given by (lienor’s customer) .
This notice is to inform you that the undersigned intends to look to the contractor’s bond to secure payment for the furnishing of materials or services for the improvement of the real property.
(name of lienor)
(signature of lienor or lienor’s representative)
(date)
(lienor’s address)
(d) In addition, a lienor who has not received payment for furnishing his or her labor, services, or materials must, as a condition precedent to recovery under the bond, serve a written notice of nonpayment on the contractor and a copy of the notice of nonpayment on the surety. The notice of nonpayment must be under oath and served during the progress of the work or thereafter, but may not be served later than 90 days after the final furnishing of labor, services, or materials by the lienor, or, with respect to rental equipment, later than 90 days after the date the rental equipment was on the site of the improvement and available for use. A notice of nonpayment that includes sums for retainage must specify the portion of the amount claimed for retainage. The required notice satisfies this condition precedent with respect to the payment described in the notice of nonpayment, including unpaid finance charges due under the lienor’s contract, and with respect to any other payments which become due to the lienor after the date of the notice of nonpayment. The time period for serving a notice of nonpayment is measured from the last day of furnishing labor, services, or materials by the lienor and may not be measured by other standards, such as the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of substantial completion. The failure of a lienor to receive retainage sums not in excess of 10 percent of the value of labor, services, or materials furnished by the lienor is not considered a nonpayment requiring the service of the notice provided under this paragraph. If the payment bond is not recorded before commencement of construction, the time period for the lienor to serve a notice of nonpayment may, at the option of the lienor, be calculated from the date specified in this section or the date the lienor is served a copy of the bond. However, the limitation period for commencement of an action on the payment bond as established in paragraph (e) may not be expanded. The negligent inclusion or omission of any information in the notice of nonpayment that has not prejudiced the contractor or surety does not constitute a default that operates to defeat an otherwise valid bond claim. A lienor who serves a fraudulent notice of nonpayment forfeits his or her rights under the bond. A notice of nonpayment is fraudulent if the lienor has willfully exaggerated the amount unpaid, willfully included a claim for work not performed or materials not furnished for the subject improvement, or prepared the notice with such willful and gross negligence as to amount to a willful exaggeration. However, a minor mistake or error in a notice of nonpayment, or a good faith dispute as to the amount unpaid, does not constitute a willful exaggeration that operates to defeat an otherwise valid claim against the bond. The service of a fraudulent notice of nonpayment is a complete defense to the lienor’s claim against the bond. The notice under this paragraph must include the following information, current as of the date of the notice, and must be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF NONPAYMENT
To: (name of contractor and address)
(name of surety and address)
The undersigned lienor notifies you that:
1. The lienor has furnished (describe labor, services, or materials) for the improvement of the real property identified as (property description) . The corresponding amount unpaid to date is $ , of which $ is unpaid retainage.
2. The lienor has been paid to date the amount of $ for previously furnishing (describe labor, services, or materials) for this improvement.
3. The lienor expects to furnish (describe labor, services, or materials) for this improvement in the future (if known), and the corresponding amount expected to become due is $ (if known).
I declare that I have read the foregoing Notice of Nonpayment and that the facts stated in it are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
DATED on , .
(signature and address of lienor)
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by means of ☐ physical presence or sworn to (or affirmed) by ☐ online notarization this day of , (year) , by (name of signatory) .
(Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida)
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)
Personally Known OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
(e) An action for the labor, materials, or supplies may not be instituted or prosecuted against the contractor or surety unless both notices have been given, if required by this section. An action must be instituted or prosecuted against the contractor or against the surety on the bond under this section within 1 year after the performance of the labor or completion of delivery of the materials and supplies. The time period for bringing an action against the contractor or surety on the bond is measured from the last day of furnishing labor, services, or materials by the lienor. The time period may not be measured by other standards, such as the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of substantial completion. A contractor or the contractor’s attorney may elect to shorten the time within which an action to enforce any claim against a payment bond provided under this section or s. 713.245 must be commenced at any time after a notice of nonpayment, if required, has been served for the claim by recording in the clerk’s office a notice in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF CONTEST OF CLAIM
AGAINST PAYMENT BOND
To: (Name and address of lienor)
You are notified that the undersigned contests your notice of nonpayment, dated , , and served on the undersigned on , , and that the time within which you may file suit to enforce your claim is limited to 60 days after the date of service of this notice.
DATED on , .
Signed: (Contractor or Attorney)
The claim of any lienor upon whom the notice is served and who fails to institute a suit to enforce his or her claim against the payment bond within 60 days after service of the notice is extinguished automatically. The contractor or the contractor’s attorney shall serve, in accordance with s. 713.18, a copy of the notice of contest to the lienor at the address shown in the notice of nonpayment or most recent amendment thereto and shall certify to such service on the face of the notice and record the notice. After the clerk records the notice with the certificate of service, the clerk shall serve, in accordance with s. 713.18, a copy of such recorded notice on the lienor and the contractor or the contractor’s attorney. The clerk of the court shall charge fees for such services as provided by law.
(f) A lienor has a direct right of action on the bond against the surety. Any provision in a payment bond issued on or after October 1, 2012, which further restricts the classes of persons who are protected by the payment bond, which restricts the venue of any proceeding relating to such payment bond, which limits or expands the effective duration of the payment bond, or which adds conditions precedent to the enforcement of a claim against a payment bond beyond those provided in this part is unenforceable. The surety is not entitled to the defense of pro tanto discharge as against any lienor because of changes or modifications in the contract to which the surety is not a party; but the liability of the surety may not be increased beyond the penal sum of the bond. A lienor may not waive in advance his or her right to bring an action under the bond against the surety.
(2) The bond shall secure every lien under the direct contract accruing subsequent to its execution and delivery, except that of the contractor. Every claim of lien, except that of the contractor, filed subsequent to execution and delivery of the bond shall be transferred to it with the same effect as liens transferred under s. 713.24. Record notice of the transfer shall be effected by the contractor, or any person having an interest in the property against which the claim of lien has been asserted, by recording in the clerk’s office a notice, with the bond attached, in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF BOND
To: (Name and Address of Lienor)
You are notified that the claim of lien filed by you on , , and recorded in Official Records Book at page of the public records of County, Florida, is secured by a bond, a copy being attached.
Signed: (Name of person recording notice)
The notice shall be verified. The person recording the notice of bond shall serve a copy of the notice with a copy of the bond to the lienor at the address shown in the claim of lien, or the most recent amendment to it; shall certify to the service on the face of the notice; and shall record the notice.
(3) A payment bond in substantially the following form shall be sufficient:
PAYMENT BOND
BY THIS BOND We, , as Principal, and , a corporation, as Surety, are bound to , herein called Owner, in the sum of $ for the payment of which we bind ourselves, our heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally.
THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal:
1. Promptly makes payments to all lienors supplying labor, material, and supplies used directly or indirectly by Principal in the prosecution of the work provided in the contract dated , , between Principal and Owner for construction of , the contract being made a part of this bond by reference; and
2. Pays Owner all loss, damage, expenses, costs, and attorney’s fees, including appellate proceedings, that Owner sustains because of default by Principal under paragraph 1. of this bond;
then this bond is void; otherwise, it remains in full force.
Any changes in or under the contract documents and compliance or noncompliance with formalities connected with the contract or with the changes do not affect Surety’s obligation under this bond.
DATED on , .
(Principal) (SEAL)
(Surety’s name)
By
As Attorney in Fact
(4) The provisions of s. 713.24(3) apply to bonds under this section except when those provisions conflict with this section.
(5) A waiver and release of lien pursuant to s. 713.20 given by a lienor shall constitute a waiver and release in a like amount of the lienor’s right to make a claim against a payment bond under this section.
History.—s. 1, ch. 63-135; s. 14, ch. 65-456; s. 35, ch. 67-254; s. 10, ch. 77-353; s. 8, ch. 80-97; s. 5, ch. 87-74; s. 6, ch. 88-397; s. 12, ch. 90-109; s. 812, ch. 97-102; s. 6, ch. 98-135; s. 32, ch. 99-6; s. 8, ch. 99-386; s. 8, ch. 2001-211; s. 10, ch. 2005-227; s. 11, ch. 2012-211; s. 4, ch. 2019-94; s. 12, ch. 2023-226.
Note.—Former s. 84.231.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 91
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2024 · leading case: Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “The new Notice of Commencement acknowledged that the Project now had a payment bond pursuant to section 713.23, and identified Westchester Fire as the surety providing the payment bond.”
Prof'l Plast. v. Bridgeport-Strasberg, 940 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “It alleged that the bond was a common law bond and that the notice and other requirements of section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), did not apply.”
Resnick Developers South v. Clerici, 340 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). “Pursuant to this contract the owner required the general contractor to furnish a payment bond pursuant to Section 713.23, Florida Statutes. In accordance with the contract the owner on October 23, 1972 received a payment bond in the amount of the original contract price,…”
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co., 903 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Contractor and the Surety raised several defenses as to the bond claim, including that the bond is a statutory payment bond under section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), that the Subcontractor did not comply with the notice requirements of section 713.”
Bankers & Shippers Ins. v. Aia Insulation, 390 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). “A suit by anyone (other than Inland as prime contractor) to foreclose a lien was subject to being defeated by an affirmative defense asserting the existence of a proper payment bond. Accordingly, the trial court should have made the awards to the subcontractors Hamilton,…”
OBS Co. v. Pace Const. Corp., 558 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1990). “Finally, it would be inequitable to nullify the bonding company's liability because the owner has not paid the contractor.”
Mursten Const. Co. v. CES Indus., Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). “The general contractor obtained a payment bond from Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as surety, pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988).”
Delta Fire Sprinklers v. ONEBEACON INS., 937 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “We conclude, as did the trial court, that the construction payment bond issued by OneBeacon was a statutory bond that comported with section 713.23, Florida Statutes (2001), and that because Delta Fire failed to provide the required statutory notice of nonpayment, it could not…”
Gen. Ins. Co. v. Sentry Indem. Co., 384 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). “Sentry paid the claims, and then filed suit against Arnold and General on the prime contractor's payment bond.”
Carlson-Se. Corp. v. Geolithic, Inc., 530 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “7 million payment bond issued by Seaboard Surety Company (the surety) pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes, [1] to insulate the Publix property from the filing of mechanics' liens.”
Bridgeport Inc. v. Rinker Materials Corp., 849 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “Rinker asserts that its claim of lien serves as the statutory notice required under section 713.23, Florida Statutes. Section 713.”
North Am. Spec. Ins. v. Bergeron Dev., 745 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). “North American filed an answer and alleged several affirmative defenses, including failure to state a cause of action under section 713.23, and failure to satisfy conditions precedent to payment under section 713.”
713.23(1): 3 cases
Coordinated Constructors v. Florida Fill, Inc., 387 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Bridgeport Inc. v. Rinker Materials Corp., 849 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “Rinker asserts that its claim of lien serves as the statutory notice required under section 713.23, Florida Statutes. Section 713.”
Jones v. Darin & Armstrong, Inc., 785 F.2d 1521 (11th Cir. 1986).
713.23(1)(a): 7 cases
OBS Co. v. Pace Const. Corp., 558 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1990). “Finally, it would be inequitable to nullify the bonding company's liability because the owner has not paid the contractor.”
Prof'l Plast. v. Bridgeport-Strasberg, 940 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “It alleged that the bond was a common law bond and that the notice and other requirements of section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), did not apply.”
Carlson-Se. Corp. v. Geolithic, Inc., 530 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “7 million payment bond issued by Seaboard Surety Company (the surety) pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes, [1] to insulate the Publix property from the filing of mechanics' liens.”
WMS Const., Inc. v. Palm Springs Mile Assoc., Ltd., 762 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Kidder Elec. of Fla., Inc. v. US Fid. & Guar. Co., 530 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
713.23(1)(b): 2 cases
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co., 903 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Contractor and the Surety raised several defenses as to the bond claim, including that the bond is a statutory payment bond under section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), that the Subcontractor did not comply with the notice requirements of section 713.”
Bridgeport Inc. v. Rinker Materials Corp., 849 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “Rinker asserts that its claim of lien serves as the statutory notice required under section 713.23, Florida Statutes. Section 713.”
713.23(1)(c): 3 cases
Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “The new Notice of Commencement acknowledged that the Project now had a payment bond pursuant to section 713.23, and identified Westchester Fire as the surety providing the payment bond.”
Delta Fire Sprinklers v. ONEBEACON INS., 937 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “We conclude, as did the trial court, that the construction payment bond issued by OneBeacon was a statutory bond that comported with section 713.23, Florida Statutes (2001), and that because Delta Fire failed to provide the required statutory notice of nonpayment, it could not…”
Prof'l Plast. v. Bridgeport-Strasberg, 940 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “It alleged that the bond was a common law bond and that the notice and other requirements of section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), did not apply.”
713.23(1)(d): 12 cases
Delta Fire Sprinklers v. ONEBEACON INS., 937 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “We conclude, as did the trial court, that the construction payment bond issued by OneBeacon was a statutory bond that comported with section 713.23, Florida Statutes (2001), and that because Delta Fire failed to provide the required statutory notice of nonpayment, it could not…”
North Am. Spec. Ins. v. Bergeron Dev., 745 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). “North American filed an answer and alleged several affirmative defenses, including failure to state a cause of action under section 713.23, and failure to satisfy conditions precedent to payment under section 713.”
Mursten Const. Co. v. CES Indus., Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). “The general contractor obtained a payment bond from Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as surety, pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988).”
Oolite Indus., Inc. v. MILLMAN CONST. CO., 501 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co., 903 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Contractor and the Surety raised several defenses as to the bond claim, including that the bond is a statutory payment bond under section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), that the Subcontractor did not comply with the notice requirements of section 713.”
713.23(1)(e): 6 cases
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co., 903 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Contractor and the Surety raised several defenses as to the bond claim, including that the bond is a statutory payment bond under section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), that the Subcontractor did not comply with the notice requirements of section 713.”
Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “The new Notice of Commencement acknowledged that the Project now had a payment bond pursuant to section 713.23, and identified Westchester Fire as the surety providing the payment bond.”
North Am. Spec. Ins. v. Bergeron Dev., 745 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). “North American filed an answer and alleged several affirmative defenses, including failure to state a cause of action under section 713.23, and failure to satisfy conditions precedent to payment under section 713.”
Harvesters Grp., Inc. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 527 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Mursten Const. Co. v. CES Indus., Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). “The general contractor obtained a payment bond from Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as surety, pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988).”
713.23(1)(f): 8 cases
Mursten Const. Co. v. CES Indus., Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). “The general contractor obtained a payment bond from Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as surety, pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988).”
Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. MRK Const., Inc., 602 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Miller & Solomon Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. Brennan's Glass Co., 837 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
Otis Elevator Co. v. Employers Ins., Wausau, 526 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Kidder Elec. of Fla., Inc. v. US Fid. & Guar. Co., 530 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
713.23(1)(g): 4 cases
Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Jetstar Dev., Inc., 515 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Halls Ceramic Tile, Inc. v. Tiede-Zoeller Tile Corp., 522 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Gorman Co. of Fort Lauderdale v. Frank Maio Gen. Contractor, Inc., 438 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
Carlson-Se. Corp. v. Geolithic, Inc., 530 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “7 million payment bond issued by Seaboard Surety Company (the surety) pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes, [1] to insulate the Publix property from the filing of mechanics' liens.”
713.23(2): 10 cases
Mursten Const. Co. v. CES Indus., Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). “The general contractor obtained a payment bond from Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as surety, pursuant to section 713.23, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988).”
Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “The new Notice of Commencement acknowledged that the Project now had a payment bond pursuant to section 713.23, and identified Westchester Fire as the surety providing the payment bond.”
Cooley v. Gen. Elevator Corp. (In Re Advanced Contractors), 44 B.R. 239 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984).
Miller & Solomon Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. Brennan's Glass Co., 837 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
Bankers & Shippers Ins. v. Aia Insulation, 390 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). “A suit by anyone (other than Inland as prime contractor) to foreclose a lien was subject to being defeated by an affirmative defense asserting the existence of a proper payment bond. Accordingly, the trial court should have made the awards to the subcontractors Hamilton,…”
713.23(3): 2 cases
Prof'l Plast. v. Bridgeport-Strasberg, 940 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “It alleged that the bond was a common law bond and that the notice and other requirements of section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), did not apply.”
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co., 903 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The Contractor and the Surety raised several defenses as to the bond claim, including that the bond is a statutory payment bond under section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), that the Subcontractor did not comply with the notice requirements of section 713.”
713.23(d): 1 case
Prof'l Plast. v. Bridgeport-Strasberg, 940 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “It alleged that the bond was a common law bond and that the notice and other requirements of section 713.23, Florida Statutes (1999), did not apply.”
713.23(f)(2): 1 case
Milton Constr. Co. v. JMS Dev. Constr., Inc., 967 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
713.23(l)(c): 1 case
Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “The new Notice of Commencement acknowledged that the Project now had a payment bond pursuant to section 713.23, and identified Westchester Fire as the surety providing the payment bond.”
713.23(l)(d): 4 cases
Florida Bar, 544 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1989).
Midtown Enter., Inc. v. Local Contractors, Inc., 750 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Essex Crane Rental Corp. of Alabama v. Millman Constr. Co., 516 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Walter E. Heller & Co. Se. v. Palmer-Smith, 504 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
713.23(l)(e): 1 case
Stock Bldg. Supply of Florida, Inc. v. Soares Da Costa Constr. Servs., LLC, 76 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). “The new Notice of Commencement acknowledged that the Project now had a payment bond pursuant to section 713.23, and identified Westchester Fire as the surety providing the payment bond.”
713.23(l)(f): 3 cases
Cooley v. Gen. Elevator Corp. (In Re Advanced Contractors), 44 B.R. 239 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984).
Walter E. Heller & Co. Se. v. Palmer-Smith, 504 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
Moody v. E.E. Dean Snavely, Inc., 465 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.