Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 720.308 (2025)
Assessments and charges.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
720.308 Assessments and charges.—
(1) ASSESSMENTS.—For any community created after October 1, 1995, the governing documents must describe the manner in which expenses are shared and specify the member’s proportional share thereof.
(a) Assessments levied pursuant to the annual budget or special assessment must be in the member’s proportional share of expenses as described in the governing document, which share may be different among classes of parcels based upon the state of development thereof, levels of services received by the applicable members, or other relevant factors.
(b) While the developer is in control of the homeowners’ association, it may be excused from payment of its share of the operating expenses and assessments related to its parcels for any period of time for which the developer has, in the declaration, obligated itself to pay any operating expenses incurred that exceed the assessments receivable from other members and other income of the association.
(c) Assessments or contingent assessments may be levied by the board of directors of the association to secure the obligation of the homeowners’ association for insurance acquired from a self-insurance fund authorized and operating pursuant to s. 624.462.
(d) This section does not apply to an association, no matter when created, if the association is created in a community that is included in an effective development-of-regional-impact development order as of October 1, 1995, together with any approved modifications thereto.
(2) GUARANTEES OF COMMON EXPENSES.—
(a) Establishment of a guarantee.—If a guarantee of the assessments of parcel owners is not included in the purchase contracts or declaration, any agreement establishing a guarantee shall only be effective upon the approval of a majority of the voting interests of the members other than the developer. Approval shall be expressed at a meeting of the members voting in person or by limited proxy or by agreement in writing without a meeting if provided in the bylaws. Such guarantee must meet the requirements of this section.
(b) Guarantee period.—The period of time for the guarantee shall be indicated by a specific beginning and ending date or event.
1. The ending date or event shall be the same for all of the members of an association, including members in different phases of the development.
2. The guarantee may provide for different intervals of time during a guarantee period with different dollar amounts for each such interval.
3. The guarantee may provide that after the initial stated period, the developer has an option to extend the guarantee for one or more additional stated periods. The extension of a guarantee is limited to extending the ending date or event; therefore, the developer does not have the option of changing the level of assessments guaranteed.
(3) MAXIMUM LEVEL OF ASSESSMENTS.—The stated dollar amount of the guarantee shall be an exact dollar amount for each parcel identified in the declaration. Regardless of the stated dollar amount of the guarantee, assessments charged to a member shall not exceed the maximum obligation of the member based on the total amount of the adopted budget and the member’s proportionate share of the expenses as described in the governing documents.
(4) CASH FUNDING REQUIREMENTS DURING GUARANTEE.—The cash payments required from the guarantor during the guarantee period shall be determined as follows:
(a) If at any time during the guarantee period the funds collected from member assessments at the guaranteed level and other revenues collected by the association are not sufficient to provide payment, on a timely basis, of all assessments, including the full funding of the reserves unless properly waived, the guarantor shall advance sufficient cash to the association at the time such payments are due.
(b) Expenses incurred in the production of nonassessment revenues, not in excess of the nonassessment revenues, shall not be included in the assessments. If the expenses attributable to nonassessment revenues exceed nonassessment revenues, only the excess expenses must be funded by the guarantor. Interest earned on the investment of association funds may be used to pay the income tax expense incurred as a result of the investment; such expense shall not be charged to the guarantor; and the net investment income shall be retained by the association. Each such nonassessment-revenue-generating activity shall be considered separately. Any portion of the parcel assessment which is budgeted for designated capital contributions of the association shall not be used to pay operating expenses.
(5) CALCULATION OF GUARANTOR’S FINAL OBLIGATION.—The guarantor’s total financial obligation to the association at the end of the guarantee period shall be determined on the accrual basis using the following formula: the guarantor shall pay any deficits that exceed the guaranteed amount, less the total regular periodic assessments earned by the association from the members other than the guarantor during the guarantee period regardless of whether the actual level charged was less than the maximum guaranteed amount.
(6) EXPENSES.—Expenses incurred in the production of nonassessment revenues, not in excess of the nonassessment revenues, shall not be included in the operating expenses. If the expenses attributable to nonassessment revenues exceed nonassessment revenues, only the excess expenses must be funded by the guarantor. Interest earned on the investment of association funds may be used to pay the income tax expense incurred as a result of the investment; such expense shall not be charged to the guarantor; and the net investment income shall be retained by the association. Each such nonassessment-revenue-generating activity shall be considered separately. Any portion of the parcel assessment which is budgeted for designated capital contributions of the association shall not be used to pay operating expenses.
Note.—Former s. 617.308.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: MacKenzie v. Centex Homes Ex Rel. Centex Real Est. Corp., 208 So. 3d 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).
MacKenzie v. Centex Homes Ex Rel. Centex Real Est. Corp., 208 So. 3d 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). “We disagree with the court’s interpretations of section 720.308 and find that section 720.”
Pulte Home Corp. v. Vermillion Homeowners Ass'n, 109 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). “” See also § 720.308(1), Fla. Stat. (2011) (authorizing the Association to maintain such actions).”
United States v. Forest Hill Gardens East Condo. Ass'n, 990 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Fla. 2014). “”§ 720.308(l)(a), Fla. Stat. In short, chapter 720’s statutory safe harbor includes only those expenses and assessments that the unit owners’ share collectively, a shared benefit and burden that does not include amounts for interest, late fees, attorney’s fees, and costs…”
Vitalia at Tradition Residents' Ass'n, Inc. v. Vitalia at Tradition, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). “22 exempting the developer from payment of assessments on its own properties after turnover was unenforceable because it conflicted with section 720.308, Florida Statutes (2019), governing the proportional allocation of assessments among members.”
Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n), 560 B.R. 824 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2016). “4; Section 720.308, Florida Statutes. D.R. Horton elected deficit funding from the options that were available under the Master Declaration and Florida Statutes.”
Valencia Reserve Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Boynton Beach Assocs., Xix, Lllp (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “ANALYSIS The issue before this Court is whether the Developer’s use of the working fund contributions to offset its deficit obligation is prohibited by Chapter 720 and, in particular, Section 720.308. We begin our analysis by noting that the statutory provisions at issue in the…”
Straub v. Muir-Villas Homeowners Ass'n, 128 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). “” § 720.308(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). The statutes discussing assessments refer to the “governing documents” as controlling.”
Schwarz v. Lennar Homes LLC (M.D. Fla. 2025). “Plaintiffs’ Complaint asserts claims for: (1) injunctive relief under Florida’s Homeowners’ Association Act, (2) violation of Florida Statute § 720.308, and (3) violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
— 720.308(1) — 3 cases
Pulte Home Corp. v. Vermillion Homeowners Ass'n, 109 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). “” See also § 720.308(1), Fla. Stat. (2011) (authorizing the Association to maintain such actions).”
Vitalia at Tradition Residents' Ass'n, Inc. v. Vitalia at Tradition, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). “22 exempting the developer from payment of assessments on its own properties after turnover was unenforceable because it conflicted with section 720.308, Florida Statutes (2019), governing the proportional allocation of assessments among members.”
Valencia Reserve Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Boynton Beach Assocs., Xix, Lllp (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “ANALYSIS The issue before this Court is whether the Developer’s use of the working fund contributions to offset its deficit obligation is prohibited by Chapter 720 and, in particular, Section 720.308. We begin our analysis by noting that the statutory provisions at issue in the…”
— 720.308(1)(a) — 1 case
Vitalia at Tradition Residents' Ass'n, Inc. v. Vitalia at Tradition, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). “22 exempting the developer from payment of assessments on its own properties after turnover was unenforceable because it conflicted with section 720.308, Florida Statutes (2019), governing the proportional allocation of assessments among members.”
— 720.308(1)(b) — 2 cases
Valencia Reserve Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Boynton Beach Assocs., Xix, Lllp (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “ANALYSIS The issue before this Court is whether the Developer’s use of the working fund contributions to offset its deficit obligation is prohibited by Chapter 720 and, in particular, Section 720.308. We begin our analysis by noting that the statutory provisions at issue in the…”
Vitalia at Tradition Residents' Ass'n, Inc. v. Vitalia at Tradition, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). “22 exempting the developer from payment of assessments on its own properties after turnover was unenforceable because it conflicted with section 720.308, Florida Statutes (2019), governing the proportional allocation of assessments among members.”
— 720.308(5) — 1 case
Valencia Reserve Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Boynton Beach Assocs., Xix, Lllp (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “ANALYSIS The issue before this Court is whether the Developer’s use of the working fund contributions to offset its deficit obligation is prohibited by Chapter 720 and, in particular, Section 720.308. We begin our analysis by noting that the statutory provisions at issue in the…”
— 720.308(l)(a) — 2 cases
United States v. Forest Hill Gardens East Condo. Ass'n, 990 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Fla. 2014). “”§ 720.308(l)(a), Fla. Stat. In short, chapter 720’s statutory safe harbor includes only those expenses and assessments that the unit owners’ share collectively, a shared benefit and burden that does not include amounts for interest, late fees, attorney’s fees, and costs…”
Straub v. Muir-Villas Homeowners Ass'n, 128 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). “” § 720.308(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). The statutes discussing assessments refer to the “governing documents” as controlling.”
— 720.308(l)(b) — 2 cases
MacKenzie v. Centex Homes Ex Rel. Centex Real Est. Corp., 208 So. 3d 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). “We disagree with the court’s interpretations of section 720.308 and find that section 720.”
Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n), 560 B.R. 824 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2016). “4; Section 720.308, Florida Statutes. D.R. Horton elected deficit funding from the options that were available under the Master Declaration and Florida Statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.