Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 723.037 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 723.037 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 723.037

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 723
MOBILE HOME PARK LOT TENANCIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 723.037
723.037 Lot rental increases; reduction in services or utilities; change in rules and regulations; mediation.
(1) A park owner shall give written notice to each affected mobile home owner and the board of directors of the homeowners’ association, if one has been formed, at least 90 days before any increase in lot rental amount or reduction in services or utilities provided by the park owner or change in rules and regulations. The park owner may give notice of all increases in lot rental amount for multiple anniversary dates in the same 90-day notice. The notice must identify all other affected homeowners, which may be by lot number, name, group, or phase. If the affected homeowners are not identified by name, the park owner shall make the names and addresses available upon request. However, this requirement does not authorize the release of the names, addresses, or other private information about the homeowners to the association or any other person for any other purpose. The home owner’s right to the 90-day notice may not be waived or precluded by a home owner, or the homeowners’ committee, in an agreement with the park owner. Rules adopted as a result of restrictions imposed by governmental entities and required to protect the public health, safety, and welfare may be enforced prior to the expiration of the 90-day period but are not otherwise exempt from the requirements of this chapter. Pass-through charges must be separately listed as to the amount of the charge, the name of the governmental entity mandating the capital improvement, and the nature or type of the pass-through charge being levied. Notices of increase in the lot rental amount due to a pass-through charge must state the additional payment and starting and ending dates of each pass-through charge. The homeowners’ association shall have no standing to challenge the increase in lot rental amount, reduction in services or utilities, or change of rules and regulations unless a majority of the affected homeowners agree, in writing, to such representation.
(2) Notice as required by this section shall, in addition to the information required in subsection (1), only be required to include the dollar amount of the relevant portions of the present lot rental amount that are being increased and the dollar amount of the proposed increases in lot rental amount if there is an increase in the lot rental amount, the reduction in services or utilities, or the change in rules and regulations and the effective date thereof.
(3) The park owner shall file annually with the division a copy of any notice of a lot rental amount increase. The notice shall be filed on or before January 1 of each year for any notice given during the preceding year. If the actual increase is an amount less than the proposed amount stated in the notice, the park owner shall notify the division of the actual amount of the increase within 30 days of the effective date of the increase or at the time of filing, whichever is later.
(4)(a) A committee, not to exceed five in number, designated by a majority of the affected mobile home owners or by the board of directors of the homeowners’ association, if applicable, and the park owner shall meet, at a mutually convenient time and place no later than 60 days before the effective date of the change to discuss the reasons for the increase in lot rental amount, reduction in services or utilities, or change in rules and regulations. The negotiating committee shall make a written request for a meeting with the park owner or subdivision developer to discuss those matters addressed in the 90-day notice, and may include in the request a listing of any other issue, with supporting documentation, that the committee intends to raise and discuss at the meeting. The committee shall address all lot rental amount increases that are specified in the notice of lot rental amount increase, regardless of the effective date of the increase.
(b)1. At the meeting, the park owner or subdivision developer shall in good faith disclose and explain all material factors resulting in the decision to increase the lot rental amount, reduce services or utilities, or change rules and regulations, including how those factors justify the specific change proposed. The park owner or subdivision developer may not limit the discussion of the reasons for the change to generalities only, such as, but not limited to, increases in operational costs, changes in economic conditions, or rents charged by comparable mobile home parks. For example, if the reason for an increase in lot rental amount is an increase in operational costs, the park owner must disclose the item or items which have increased, the amount of the increase, any similar item or items which have decreased, and the amount of the decrease. If an increase is based upon the lot rental amount charged by comparable mobile home parks, the park owner shall disclose, and provide in writing to the committee at or before the meeting, the name, address, lot rental amount, and any other relevant factors relied upon by the park owner, such as facilities, services, and amenities, concerning the comparable mobile home parks. The information concerning comparable mobile home parks to be exchanged by the parties is to encourage a dialogue concerning the reasons used by the park owner for the increase in lot rental amount and to encourage the home owners to evaluate and discuss the reasons for those changes with the park owner. The park owner shall prepare a written summary of the material factors and retain a copy for 3 years. The park owner shall provide the committee a copy of the summary at or before the meeting.
2. The park owner shall not limit the comparable mobile home park disclosure to those mobile home parks that are owned or operated by the same owner or operator as the subject park, except in certain circumstances, which include, but are not limited to:
a. That the market area for comparable mobile home parks includes mobile home parks owned or operated by the same entity that have similar facilities, services, and amenities;
b. That the subject mobile home park has unique attributes that are shared with similar mobile home parks;
c. That the mobile home park is located in a geographic or market area that contains few comparable mobile home parks; or
d. That there are similar considerations or factors that would be considered in such a market analysis by a competent professional and would be considered in determining the valuation of the market rent.
(c) If the committee disagrees with a park owner’s lot rental amount increase based upon comparable mobile home parks, the committee shall disclose to the park owner the name, address, lot rental amount, and any other relevant factors relied upon by the committee, such as facilities, services, and amenities, concerning the comparable mobile home parks. The committee shall provide to the park owner the disclosure, in writing, within 15 days after the meeting with the park owner, together with a request for a second meeting. The park owner shall meet with the committee at a mutually convenient time and place within 30 days after receipt by the park owner of the request from the committee to discuss the disclosure provided by the committee. At the second meeting, the park owner may take into account the information on comparable parks provided by the committee, may supplement the information provided to the committee at the first meeting, and may modify his or her position, but the park owner may not change the information provided to the committee at the first meeting.
(d) The committee and the park owner may mutually agree, in writing, to extend or continue any meetings required by this section.
(e) Either party may prepare and use additional information to support its position during or subsequent to the meetings required by this section.

This subsection is not intended to be enforced by civil or administrative action. Rather, the meetings and discussions are intended to be in the nature of settlement discussions prior to the parties proceeding to mediation of any dispute.

(5)(a) Within 30 days after the date of the last scheduled meeting described in subsection (4), the homeowners may petition the division to initiate mediation of the dispute pursuant to s. 723.038 if a majority of the affected homeowners have designated, in writing, that:
1. The rental increase is unreasonable;
2. The rental increase has made the lot rental amount unreasonable;
3. The decrease in services or utilities is not accompanied by a corresponding decrease in rent or is otherwise unreasonable; or
4. The change in the rules and regulations is unreasonable.
(b) A park owner, within the same time period, may also petition the division to initiate mediation of the dispute.
(c) When a dispute involves a rental increase for different home owners and there are different rates or different rental terms for those home owners, all such rent increases in a calendar year for one mobile home park may be considered in one mediation proceeding.
(d) At mediation, the park owner and the homeowners committee may supplement the information provided to each other at the meetings described in subsection (4) and may modify their position, but they may not change the information provided to each other at the first and second meetings.

The purpose of this subsection is to encourage discussion and evaluation by the parties of the comparable mobile home parks in the competitive market area. The requirements of this subsection are not intended to be enforced by civil or administrative action. Rather, the meetings and discussions are intended to be in the nature of settlement discussions prior to the parties proceeding to litigation of any dispute.

(6) If a party requests mediation and the opposing party refuses to agree to mediate upon proper request, the party refusing to mediate shall not be entitled to attorney’s fees in any action relating to a dispute described in this section.
(7) The term “parties,” for purposes of mediation under this section and s. 723.038, means a park owner and a homeowners’ committee selected pursuant to this section.
History.s. 1, ch. 84-80; s. 8, ch. 86-162; s. 15, ch. 88-147; s. 10, ch. 90-198; s. 8, ch. 92-148; s. 2, ch. 97-291; s. 5, ch. 2001-227; s. 1, ch. 2002-27; s. 1, ch. 2005-79; s. 6, ch. 2015-90; s. 25, ch. 2020-27.

F.S. 723.037 on Google Scholar

F.S. 723.037 on Casetext

Amendments to 723.037


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 723.037
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 723.037.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

T W DEVELOPERS, INC. d b a v. SALMONSEN,, 31 So. 3d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The trial court ruled that section 723.037 applied. . . . See § 723.037. . . . . § 723.037(1). . . . . § 723.037(4)(a). . . . See § 723.037(6). . . .

SUN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS, INC. a v. AMERICAN LAND LEASE, INC. a L. P. a, 927 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . granted the summary judgment- on the basis of Sun Valley Homeowners’ failure to comply with section 723.037 . . . Before discussing the requirement set forth in section 723.037(1) and its application to this case, we . . . The Standing Requirement of Section 723.037(1) Section 723.037 deals with the resolution of disputes . . . The statute also sets forth the process for the initiation of formal mediation. § 723.037(5). . . . Section 723.037(1) does two things. . . .

LAKE HAVEN MOBILE HOME OWNERS, INC. a v. ORANGELAND VISTAS, INC. d b a a, 408 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . Stat. § 723.037(1). . . . Rule 7D-32.002(1), a rule interpreting § 723.037(1). Menna, supra, at 899. . . . See § 723.037(4), (5); § 723.038; § 723.0381. . . . The court disagreed finding the park owner had satisfied the purpose of § 723.037(1). . . . Stat. § 723.037(1). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. . . .

AMBER GLADES, INC. v. LEISURE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P S, 893 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 723.037(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . not enforce this statute because the dispute over the mediation agreement was not covered by section 723.037 . . . Section 723.037(1) requires written authorizations to commence mediation. . . .

MALCO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. FEATHEROCK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 854 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . five-member committee that was designated by a majority of the homeowners in accordance with section 723.037 . . . action because the Association did not comply with the statutory prerequisite, set forth in section 723.037 . . . We agree that the Owner’s standing argument founded on section 723.037 has no merit. . . . Section 723.037, Florida Statutes (2001), addresses challenges to lot rental increases and provides in . . . Therefore, section 723.037(1) does not control our resolution of the standing issue. . . .

D. EASTMAN, v. FLOR- OHIO, LTD., 744 So. 2d 499 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . park owner, finding that the park owner had failed to comply with the notice requirement of section 723.037 . . . to prepare the notice of rental increases in compliance with the requirements set forth in section 723.037 . . . existence at the time the class action suit was tried that the notice requirements contained in section 723.037 . . . failed to raise for our consideration the issue of whether the trial court properly construed section 723.037 . . . See § 723.037(1), Fla. . . .

MIHEVIC CORPORATION, v. HORIZON VILLAGE, INC., 734 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . On September 20, 1996, pursuant to section 723.037(1), Florida Statutes (1995), of the Florida Mobile . . . services provided by the Owner, it fully complied with the ninety-day notice requirement of section 723.037 . . . Association and the Owner met to discuss the change and entered into mediation, as provided for in section 723.037 . . . Based on Hobe and the fact that the purpose of section 723.037 was accomplished, we reverse the trial . . . Section 723.037(1), Florida Statutes (1995), provides in pertinent part: (1) A park owner shall give . . .

HOMEOWNER S CORPORATION OF RIVER TRAILS, v. SABA, Jr. d b a, 626 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . After mediation pursuant to sections 723.037 and .038 reached an impasse, the Association filed this . . .

MLH PROPERTY MANAGERS, INC. v. COX,, 613 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . rent”, and while section 723.003(10) includes such charges as “pass through charges”, under section 723.037 . . .

R. MENNA, v. SUN COUNTRY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a, 604 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The owner contends that under section 723.037(1) she is required to send the board of directors of the . . . Section 723.037(1) provides in pertinent part: A park owner shall give written notice to each affected . . . When section 723.037 was initially enacted, subsection (1) required a park owner to give written notice . . . Code, governing Notice of Lot Rental Increase under section 723.037. . . . We decline to disregard the clear legislative direction of section 723.037(1) which provides that the . . .

HERRICK, d b a v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES,, 595 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 723.037, Florida Statutes, sets forth the prescribed procedure for effecting lot rental increases . . . See § 723.037, Florida Statutes (1987). . . . Third, we conclude that section 723.037 does not permit the park owner to amend the prospectus to reduce . . . Rather, section 723.037 is a procedural notice provision which must be read in pari materia with the . . . Pursuant to section 723.037, Herrick was authorized to assess a rent increase and increase in charges . . .

BELCHER, d b a v. KIER,, 558 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 723.031(7) and 723.037(4)(a). . . . For example, section 723.037 provides that if, after informal mediation about lot rental increases, there . . .

GEHMAN, v. GRAVIS,, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 126 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . . §§ 723.037, 723.038, & 723.075 (1984 Supp.), to permit the Association or a majority of the tenants . . .

COLONIAL ACRES MOBILE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. L. WALLACH, d b a, 558 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . increase which was met by the homeowners’ request for mediation of the dispute in accordance with section 723.037 . . . in writing that a rental increase is “unreasonable” there is a right to mediation or arbitration. § 723.037 . . . The provisions covering rental increases, formerly chapter 720.202, now 723.037, became law October 1 . . .

KIER, v. BELCHER,, 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 86 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . The parties have mediated the lot rental increases for 1985, 1986, and 1987, pursuant to Sections 723.037 . . .

VIDIBOR d b a v. ADAMS,, 509 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . 1985), attorney’s fees are specifically available to “the prevailing party”: Except as provided in s. 723.037 . . . Section 723.037(6) provides that upon proper request, a party shall not be entitled to attorney’s fees . . .

HOBE ASSOCIATES, LTD. a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES,, 504 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . (Section 723.037(1), Florida Statutes (1985) requires 90 days notice). . . . The 1986 legislature directly addressed this issue when it modified subsection 2 of section 723.037, . . . Section 723.037 Lot Rental Increases: (2) Notice as required by this section shall only be required to . . . The provisions of subsection (2) of section 723.037, Florida Statutes, as created by this act, are intended . . .

VILLAGE PARK MOBILE HOME ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES,, 506 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 723.037, Florida Statutes, which governs actual lot rental increase proposals, contains the 90 . . . According to Section 723.037(2), once the written notice is given by the park owner, a committee or a . . . According to Section 723.037(5), no dispute regarding lot rental increases, reduction in services or . . . lot rental increases, reduction in services or utilities, or changes in rules or regulations (Section 723.037 . . . noncompliance with the Act, and rental increases or reduction of services remain subject to Section 723.037 . . . According to Section 723.037(2), Florida Statutes, once the written notice is given by the park owner . . .