Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 723.058 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 723.058 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 723.058

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 723
MOBILE HOME PARK LOT TENANCIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 723.058
723.058 Restrictions on sale of mobile homes.
(1) No mobile home park owner or subdivision developer shall make or enforce any rule, regulation, or rental agreement provision which denies or abridges the right of any mobile home owner or owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision to sell his or her mobile home within the park or mobile home subdivision; which prohibits the mobile home owner or the owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision from placing a “for sale” sign on or in his or her mobile home (except that the size, placement, and character of all signs are subject to properly promulgated and reasonable rules and regulations of the mobile home park or mobile home subdivision); or which requires the mobile home owner or the owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision to remove the mobile home from the park or mobile home subdivision solely on the basis of the sale thereof.
(2) The park owner or subdivision developer shall not exact a commission or fee with respect to the price realized by the seller unless the park owner or subdivision developer has acted as agent for the mobile home owner or the owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision in the sale pursuant to a written contract.
(3) No mobile home owner, owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision, or purchaser of an existing mobile home located within a park or mobile home subdivision, as a condition of tenancy, or to qualify for tenancy, or to obtain approval for tenancy in a mobile home park or mobile home subdivision, shall be required to enter into, extend, or renew a resale agreement.
(4) No resale agreement shall be construed to be of perpetual or indefinite duration. Any duration shall be construed to expire 6 months following written notice from the homeowner to the park owner or subdivision developer informing the park owner or subdivision developer that the homeowner is placing his or her mobile home for sale, and requesting the park owner or subdivision developer to utilize his or her best efforts to sell the mobile home on the homeowner’s behalf. Any extension or renewal of a resale agreement shall be in writing and shall be of specified duration.
(5) No mobile home park owner or subdivision developer shall impose a discriminatory increase in lot rental amount upon a mobile home owner, owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision, or purchaser of an existing mobile home within the park or mobile home subdivision based upon the failure or refusal of such mobile home owner, owner of a lot in a mobile home subdivision, or purchaser to enter into, extend, or renew a resale agreement prohibited by subsection (3).
History.s. 1, ch. 84-80; s. 14, ch. 90-198; s. 2, ch. 91-202; s. 923, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 723.058 on Google Scholar

F.S. 723.058 on Casetext

Amendments to 723.058


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 723.058
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 723.058.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 723.058

Total Results: 2

T & W DEVELOPERS, INC. v. Salmonsen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-04-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 31 So. 3d 298, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4291, 2010 WL 1233481

Snippet: award of attorney’s fees to Appellees. Section 723.058(1), Florida Statutes, provides, in relevant part…to sell their property in violation of section 723.058(1). On these grounds, Appellant’s complaint sought… II of the complaint sought to enforce section 723.058(1), and because Appellees prevailed on that count

Laguna Palms Properties Ltd. v. Long

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-08-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 622 So. 2d 556, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001, 1993 WL 288710

Snippet: attorney’s fees. I. The action was not based on F.S. 723.058, these complaints having been abandoned by plaintiff… II. If in fact the action was based upon F.S. 723.058, defendant failed to seek fees in its answer. Stockman