Florida Statute 725.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLI
STATUTE OF FRAUDS, FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS, AND GENERAL ASSIGNMENTS

Chapter 725
UNENFORCEABLE CONTRACTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 725.01

725.01 Promise to pay another’s debt, etc.—No action shall be brought whereby to charge any executor or administrator upon any special promise to answer or pay any debt or damages out of her or his own estate, or whereby to charge the defendant upon any special promise to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage of another person or to charge any person upon any agreement made upon consideration of marriage, or upon any contract for the sale of lands, tenements or hereditaments, or of any uncertain interest in or concerning them, or for any lease thereof for a period longer than 1 year, or upon any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of 1 year from the making thereof, or whereby to charge any health care provider upon any guarantee, warranty, or assurance as to the results of any medical, surgical, or diagnostic procedure performed by any physician licensed under chapter 458, osteopathic physician licensed under chapter 459, chiropractic physician licensed under chapter 460, podiatric physician licensed under chapter 461, or dentist licensed under chapter 466, unless the agreement or promise upon which such action shall be brought, or some note or memorandum thereof shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith or by some other person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized.

History.—s. 10, Nov. 15, 1828; RS 1995; GS 2517; RGS 3872; CGL 5779; s. 10, ch. 75-9; s. 933, ch. 97-102; s. 60, ch. 97-264; ss. 227, 294, ch. 98-166.

F.S. 725.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 725.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 725.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 725.01

Total Results: 334

PVC Windoors, Inc. v. Babbitbay Beach Construction, N.V.

598 F.3d 802, 76 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 133, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735, 2010 WL 743730

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 2010 | Docket: 44379

Cited 215 times | Published

satisfy Florida's statute of frauds, Fla. Stat. § 725.01. [14] A question the case law and treatises have

Florida College of Osteopathic Medicine, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.

12 F. Supp. 2d 1306, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17273, 1998 WL 384781

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 2366503

Cited 101 times | Published

not involving the sale of goods, Florida Statute § 725.01, was met. (Docket No. 14). FCOM asserts that the

Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. Valcin

507 So. 2d 596, 69 A.L.R. 4th 895

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1987 | Docket: 459970

Cited 93 times | Published

absence of the written guarantee required under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), it found genuine

Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of Dunedin

329 So. 2d 314, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4301

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1976 | Docket: 1251225

Cited 89 times | Published

performed within the space of one year", Fla. Stat. § 725.01 (1973), or which is "for the sale of goods for

Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard

269 So. 2d 714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1972 | Docket: 1258290

Cited 59 times | Published

applicability of the statute of frauds provisions of § 725.01, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. requiring a written memorandum

Eclipse Medical, Inc. v. American Hydro-Surgical Instruments, Inc.

262 F. Supp. 2d 1334, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22434, 1999 WL 181412

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1999 | Docket: 2240937

Cited 55 times | Published

by him or her thereunto lawfully authorized." § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). As the court explained in

Scheck v. Burger King Corp.

756 F. Supp. 543, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1444, 1991 WL 15124

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1991 | Docket: 2507262

Cited 55 times | Published

performed, in less than one year. See Fla. Stat. § 725.01 (1988). Plaintiff Scheck aptly demonstrates, however

In Re SBA Factors of Miami, Inc.

13 B.R. 99, 4 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1335, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3334, 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 281

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 17, 1981 | Docket: 1844754

Cited 53 times | Published

obligation be in writing and signed by the debtor. § 725.01, Florida Statutes. No such document has been produced

Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp.

65 So. 2d 849, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1353

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1953 | Docket: 1416901

Cited 48 times | Published

cannot be enforced directly or indirectly. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A. If the deeds

In The Matter Of T & B General Contracting, Inc.

833 F.2d 1455

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 1987 | Docket: 812946

Cited 45 times | Published

default or miscarriage of another person." Section 725.01 requires that such an agreement or promise

Hall v. Burger King Corp.

912 F. Supp. 1509, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20589, 1995 WL 762146

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1995 | Docket: 221027

Cited 37 times | Published

violates the Florida Statute of Frauds. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 725.01. "Under well-settled Florida law, the statute

Tobin & Tobin Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Zeskind

315 So. 2d 518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1975 | Docket: 2518634

Cited 29 times | Published

by virtue of the statute of frauds [Fla. Stat. § 725.01, F.S.A.]. We affirm. The gravamen of the appellant's

McKinney-Green, Inc. v. Davis

606 So. 2d 393, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9444, 1992 WL 212021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1992 | Docket: 488789

Cited 26 times | Published

enforceable contract under the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1991). Khawly v. Reboul

Condrey v. Condrey

92 So. 2d 423

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1957 | Docket: 1390229

Cited 26 times | Published

enforceable because of the Statute of Frauds, F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A. This would no doubt be true if the agreement

U.S. Steel Mining Company v. Director, OWCP

386 F.3d 977, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20384, 2004 WL 2163387

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 28, 2004 | Docket: 398129

Cited 23 times | Published

pneumoconiosis (black lung disease).” 20 C.F.R. § 725.1. The Act defines "pneumoconiosis” as "a chronic

Socarras v. Claughton Hotels, Inc.

374 So. 2d 1057, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1979 | Docket: 506148

Cited 23 times | Published

Affirmed. NOTES [1] Codified under § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1977). [2] § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1977) provides in

Garcia v. Santa Maria Resort, Inc.

528 F. Supp. 2d 1283, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86193, 2007 WL 4127628

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2007 | Docket: 102582

Cited 22 times | Published

satisfy Florida's statute of frauds, Fla. Stat. § 725.01. Each of these claims must also be dismissed with

American Honda Motor Co. v. Motorcycle Information Network, Inc.

390 F. Supp. 2d 1170, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28417, 2005 WL 1126660

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 10, 2005 | Docket: 2033301

Cited 22 times | Published

not intended to be performed within one year. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part:

Korman v. Iglesias

736 F. Supp. 261, 16 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1626, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5852, 1990 WL 63031

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 10, 1990 | Docket: 1498702

Cited 21 times | Published

Statute of Frauds, as codified by Florida Statutes § 725.01 (1989), bars actions on an oral "agreement that

Khawly v. Reboul

488 So. 2d 856, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1986 | Docket: 1685442

Cited 21 times | Published

corporation, precisely what they did receive.[2] Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), Florida's statute

Gulf Solar, Inc. v. Westfall

447 So. 2d 363, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1984 | Docket: 1674710

Cited 21 times | Published

of frauds is not a bar to Westfall's suit. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent

De Vaux v. Westwood Baptist Church

953 So. 2d 677, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4907, 2007 WL 980720

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2007 | Docket: 1315252

Cited 20 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] The statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2005), provides, in pertinent

Topper v. Alcazar Operating Co.

35 So. 2d 392, 160 Fla. 421, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 762

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1948 | Docket: 3268097

Cited 20 times | Published

terms or provisions omitted by the parties. Section 725.01 F.S.A. (being the statute of frauds), requires

Meadows v. Edwards

82 So. 2d 733

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1955 | Docket: 1359307

Cited 19 times | Published

on a collateral promise within the scope of section 725.01, F.S., F.S.A., requiring an obligation to answer

Russell v. Thielen

82 So. 2d 143

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1955 | Docket: 1359684

Cited 19 times | Published

question whether the statute of frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01, applies to the formation of a joint venture to

DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC

112 So. 3d 85, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 187, 2013 WL 1235000, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 564

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2013 | Docket: 60231331

Cited 18 times | Published

contract or their lawful representatives. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2012). Nearly fifty years ago, in

Centennial Mortg., Inc. v. SG/SC, LTD.

772 So. 2d 564, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13789, 2000 WL 1587754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2000 | Docket: 1434946

Cited 17 times | Published

the parol evidence rule, the statute of frauds (§ 725.01, Fla.Stat.(1995)) and an integration clause contained

Anthony Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co.

941 F. Supp. 1567, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14792, 1996 WL 566888

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1996 | Docket: 2254170

Cited 17 times | Published

unenforceable under Florida's Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01 (1995). All Brand Importers, Inc., v. Tampa Crown

Anthony Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co.

941 F. Supp. 1567, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14792, 1996 WL 566888

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1996 | Docket: 2254170

Cited 17 times | Published

unenforceable under Florida's Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01 (1995). All Brand Importers, Inc., v. Tampa Crown

Smith v. Royal Automotive Group, Inc.

675 So. 2d 144, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4579, 1996 WL 220557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1996 | Docket: 1694566

Cited 17 times | Published

"signed writing or memorandum" requirement of section 725.01 is satisfied. Smith considers this case to

HI Ltd. Partnership v. Winghouse of Florida, Inc.

451 F.3d 1300, 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 674, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15550, 2006 WL 1642222

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 2006 | Docket: 40709

Cited 16 times | Published

AFFIRMED. 1 . Fla. Stat. § 725.01, provides in relevant part: ''[n]o action shall

Jack H. Londono v. City of Gainesville, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida

768 F.2d 1223, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21273

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 14, 1985 | Docket: 499717

Cited 16 times | Published

enforceable under the statute of frauds, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 725.01 (West Supp.1985), because the City signed no written

Clegg v. Chipola Aviation, Inc.

458 So. 2d 1186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1984 | Docket: 1452363

Cited 16 times | Published

California parties. Because the Statute of Frauds (Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1983)) requires such an

Ostman v. Lawn

305 So. 2d 871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1974 | Docket: 133477

Cited 16 times | Published

the statute of frauds. The statute of frauds, § 725.01, Fla. Stat., provides in pertinent part: "No action

Rowland v. Ewell

174 So. 2d 78

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1965 | Docket: 1714300

Cited 16 times | Published

plead as a defense the Statute of Frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01, in that the alleged agreement was oral and was

Kolski Ex Rel. Kolski v. Kolski

731 So. 2d 169, 1999 WL 294458

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1999 | Docket: 1409295

Cited 15 times | Published

action for reformation. The statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes governs oral promises to

Collier v. Brooks

632 So. 2d 149, 1994 WL 37027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1994 | Docket: 1513993

Cited 15 times | Published

" so as to make applicable the provision of section 725.01, Florida Statutes,[1] that "no action shall

Hiatt v. Vaughn

430 So. 2d 597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1983 | Docket: 445757

Cited 15 times | Published

forth the defense of the Statute of Frauds, F.S. 725.01.[2] The sole issue before this Court is whether

First Realty Inv. Corp. v. Gallaher

345 So. 2d 1088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1977 | Docket: 1477942

Cited 15 times | Published

application sub judice. We disagree and reverse. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1975), the Statute of Frauds

Blumin v. Ellis

186 So. 2d 286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1966 | Docket: 532953

Cited 15 times | Published

adopt this rule. Neither our Statute of Frauds § 725.01, Fla.Stats., F.S.A., nor our Recording Act §

Boyko v. Ilardi

613 So. 2d 103, 1993 WL 15635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1993 | Docket: 454167

Cited 14 times | Published

agreement was not barred by the statute of frauds [§ 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1991)], because performance could

First Guaranty Corp. v. Palmer Bank & Trust

405 So. 2d 186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1981 | Docket: 1703942

Cited 14 times | Published

another to be signed by the person to be charged. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1979). Moreover, to comply with the

Rushing v. Garrett

375 So. 2d 903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1979 | Docket: 1353037

Cited 14 times | Published

thereby satisfying the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes. The assumption of the existence

Kyle v. Kyle

128 So. 2d 427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1961 | Docket: 1690760

Cited 14 times | Published

women. He cites instead the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., with reference to

Hope v. National Airlines

99 So. 2d 244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1957 | Docket: 1753675

Cited 14 times | Published

by the lower court of the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Fla.Stats., F.S.A., it is well to note that

Rork v. Las Olas Company

23 So. 2d 839, 156 Fla. 510, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 912

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1945 | Docket: 3273567

Cited 14 times | Published

support of it quotes the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A. Appellee

Harris Corporation v. Giesting & Associates

297 F.3d 1270, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14408, 2002 WL 1574994

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 212838

Cited 13 times | Published

one year from the time it was made. Fla. Stat. § 725.01. The district court found no dispute that the

US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Gulf Florida Dev. Corp.

365 So. 2d 748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1978 | Docket: 1314584

Cited 13 times | Published

Further, USF&G argues that the statute of frauds, F.S. 725.01, bars Gulf Florida from establishing that USF&G

Martyn v. FIRST FED. SAV. & L. ASS'N OF W. PALM BEACH

257 So. 2d 576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1971 | Docket: 1287137

Cited 13 times | Published

we opine flatly that the statute of frauds, F.S. 725.01, F.S.A., does not bar a suit for damages upon

Bruce Construction Corp. v. State Exchange Bank

102 So. 2d 288

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1958 | Docket: 1281636

Cited 13 times | Published

therefore was barred by the Statute of Frauds. § 725.01, F.S., 1953, F.S.A. Trial was had before a jury

Gulf Theatres, Inc. v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America

26 So. 2d 188, 157 Fla. 428, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 760

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1946 | Docket: 3261553

Cited 13 times | Published

would be to disregard the statute of frauds, Section 725.01 Fla. Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.) and would

Howard Browning v. Lynn Anne Poirier

165 So. 3d 663, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 304, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1177, 2015 WL 2458005

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2015 | Docket: 2660325

Cited 12 times | Published

looked to the statute of frauds as stated in section 725.01, Florida Statutes, and the “leading case interpreting

Howard Browning v. Lynn Anne Poirier

165 So. 3d 663, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 304, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1177, 2015 WL 2458005

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2015 | Docket: 2660325

Cited 12 times | Published

looked to the statute of frauds as stated in section 725.01, Florida Statutes, and the “leading case interpreting

Aspsoft, Inc. v. WebClay

983 So. 2d 761, 2008 WL 2388017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2008 | Docket: 1668697

Cited 12 times | Published

barred by Florida's Statute of Frauds. *769 Section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes (2007) sets forth Florida's

Cavallaro v. Stratford Homes, Inc.

784 So. 2d 619, 2001 WL 557589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2001 | Docket: 1744157

Cited 12 times | Published

unenforceable under Florida's statute of frauds, section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes (1999). Pursuant to

Bird Lakes Dev. v. Meruelo

626 So. 2d 234, 1993 WL 217043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1993 | Docket: 1286167

Cited 12 times | Published

writing and signed by the party to be charged. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1991). Bird Lakes asserts that Meruelo's

Florida Pottery Stores of Panama City, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank

578 So. 2d 801, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3845, 1991 WL 59996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1991 | Docket: 441008

Cited 12 times | Published

appellants' second amended counterclaim. [4] Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985). [5] The guarantors

Jose Anglada and Isaura Anglada, His Wife v. Wilma Sprague, and Harry A. Wright, John Doe, Richard Roe

822 F.2d 1035, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9987

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 1987 | Docket: 807155

Cited 12 times | Published

to the guarantor, citing Fla.Stat. § 725.01 (1981) and American Atlantic Lines v. Ros

Fox v. Sails at Laguna Club Dev. Corp.

403 So. 2d 456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1981 | Docket: 1250351

Cited 12 times | Published

sale of real property, the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1979), requires that the

Dionne v. Columbus Mills, Inc.

311 So. 2d 681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1975 | Docket: 1261296

Cited 12 times | Published

executory contracts, not executed contracts. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes. See Miami Beach First National

Con-Dev of Vero Beach, Inc. v. Casano

272 So. 2d 203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1973 | Docket: 1645213

Cited 12 times | Published

the sale of land fall within the purview of Section 725.01, F.S. 1969, F.S.A.: "725.01 Promise to pay

Geary Distributing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. All Brand Importers, Inc., Cross-Appellee

931 F.2d 1431, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10253, 1991 WL 70880

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 1991 | Docket: 1832978

Cited 11 times | Published

that Florida’s statute of frauds, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 725.01 (West 1988), precludes this cause of action and

Coral Way Properties, Ltd. v. Roses

565 So. 2d 372, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5906, 1990 WL 114376

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1990 | Docket: 1403895

Cited 11 times | Published

lease thereof for a period longer than 1 year ..." § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1987). This case is controlled by

Verhagen v. Arroyo

552 So. 2d 1162, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1989 | Docket: 1663534

Cited 11 times | Published

the general statute of frauds, Florida Statutes § 725.01 et al. In reaching this decision, the Court relied

All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Tampa Crown Distributors, Inc.

864 F.2d 748, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 676, 1989 WL 1153

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 30, 1989 | Docket: 1445552

Cited 11 times | Published

that the Florida Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01, bars enforcement of an oral contract that was

Cohodas v. Russell

289 So. 2d 55

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1974 | Docket: 2527802

Cited 11 times | Published

comply with the Statute of Frauds, Fla. Stat. § 725.01, F.S.A. By its wording, the Statute of Frauds

Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company

249 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1971 | Docket: 1173467

Cited 11 times | Published

the action was barred by that portion of F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A., which provides: "No action shall be brought

Matthews v. Matthews

222 So. 2d 282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1969 | Docket: 1754732

Cited 11 times | Published

instant case. As to the Statute of Frauds, F.S. § 725.01 F.S.A., provides inter alia that "No action shall

Harris v. School Bd. of Duval County

921 So. 2d 725, 2006 WL 354267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2006 | Docket: 1658240

Cited 10 times | Published

flies in the teeth of the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2001), which provides that

Rubenstein v. Primedica Healthcare, Inc.

755 So. 2d 746, 2000 WL 313529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 2527068

Cited 10 times | Published

Corp., 650 So.2d 1057, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). Only if a contract could not

Sanz v. RT Aerospace Corp.

650 So. 2d 1057, 1995 WL 59487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1995 | Docket: 1346175

Cited 10 times | Published

reduced to writing in order to be enforceable. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1991); Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic

Moneyhun v. Vital Industries, Inc.

611 So. 2d 1316, 1993 WL 2973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1993 | Docket: 1757391

Cited 10 times | Published

court in concluding that the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981),[1] barred Moneyhun's

Scherer v. LABORERS'INTERN. UNION OF N. AMERICA

746 F. Supp. 73, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2962, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17290, 1988 WL 214512

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1988 | Docket: 181733

Cited 10 times | Published

violative of the Statute of Frauds. See, e.g., § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1987). But, the record does contain

Rohlfing v. Tomorrow Realty & Auction Co., Inc.

528 So. 2d 463, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1602, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2896, 1988 WL 68500

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1988 | Docket: 1717657

Cited 10 times | Published

the requirements of the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes.[3] We also find that the

Matter of Sjostedt

57 B.R. 117, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6964

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1986 | Docket: 1638557

Cited 10 times | Published

given, it is unenforceable under the Fla. Stats. § 725.01 which provides that "no action shall be brought

Monogram Products, Inc. v. Berkowitz

392 So. 2d 1353

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1980 | Docket: 1268185

Cited 10 times | Published

not be performed in one year as required by section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1979), and (2) Berkowitz

Weinsier v. Soffer

358 So. 2d 61

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1978 | Docket: 1311243

Cited 10 times | Published

conclude, therefore, that the statute of frauds (Section 725.01 Florida Statutes (1975) was a valid defense

Weinsier v. Soffer

358 So. 2d 61

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1978 | Docket: 1311243

Cited 10 times | Published

conclude, therefore, that the statute of frauds (Section 725.01 Florida Statutes (1975) was a valid defense

Heffernan v. Keith

127 So. 2d 903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1961 | Docket: 1347342

Cited 10 times | Published

receipt contract for the sale of the land because § 725.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., which is a part of *904 the

Grossman v. Levy's

81 So. 2d 752

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1955 | Docket: 1283824

Cited 10 times | Published

unenforceable by the Florida statute of frauds, F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A. The second amended complaint alleged in

Hesston Corp. v. Roche

599 So. 2d 148, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1490, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4506, 1992 WL 80612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1992 | Docket: 1741311

Cited 9 times | Published

space of one year from the making thereof... ." § 725.01 Fla. Stat. (1991). The purpose of the statute

Chaires v. North Florida Nat. Bank

432 So. 2d 183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1983 | Docket: 1264605

Cited 9 times | Published

Appellee asserts that the "statute of frauds," § 725.01, Fla.Stats., precludes recovery because the alleged

Binninger v. Hutchinson

355 So. 2d 863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1978 | Docket: 2449196

Cited 9 times | Published

never reached, and (2) the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1975), bars Hutchinson from

Fletcher v. Williams

153 So. 2d 759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1963 | Docket: 1327789

Cited 9 times | Published

distinction between the language used in F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A. (Statute of Frauds) and that used in F

Schenkel v. Atlantic National Bank of Jacksonville

141 So. 2d 327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1962 | Docket: 1476156

Cited 9 times | Published

contract was not in writing as required by law Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.), the appellant contends

Hullum v. Bre-Lew Corporation

93 So. 2d 727

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1957 | Docket: 1752122

Cited 9 times | Published

unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., and the Conveyancing

Siegel v. Rowe

71 So. 3d 205, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15722, 2011 WL 4578543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2011 | Docket: 2352489

Cited 8 times | Published

They also claimed that the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2004), barred Ms. Leahy-Fernandez's

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2009 | Docket: 1266875

Cited 8 times | Published

1441 [43] Both sides also refer to Fla. Stat. § 725.01, which is the Florida's general Statute of Frauds

LynkUs Communications, Inc. v. WebMD Corp.

965 So. 2d 1161, 2007 WL 2317291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2007 | Docket: 446789

Cited 8 times | Published

person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2000). "The statute of frauds grew

Hazen v. Allstate Ins. Co.

952 So. 2d 531, 2007 WL 101216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2007 | Docket: 1703213

Cited 8 times | Published

court's province. In the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2002), the legislature has

INDIA AMERICA TRADING, CO., INC. v. White

896 So. 2d 859, 2005 WL 419140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2005 | Docket: 1683611

Cited 8 times | Published

784 So.2d 619, 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). See also § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2004); Alvarez v. Alvarez, 800 So

Shore Holdings, Inc. v. Seagate Beach Quarters, Inc.

842 So. 2d 1010, 2003 WL 1877561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 1730469

Cited 8 times | Published

written contract for the sale of real estate. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1994). Therefore, there was no enforceable

Robert C. Malt & Co. v. Carpet World Distributors, Inc.

763 So. 2d 508, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9001, 2000 WL 991690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2000 | Docket: 1681838

Cited 8 times | Published

signed by the party to be charged therewith...." § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1999). Neither party disputes that

WHARFSIDE v. Superior Bank

741 So. 2d 542, 1999 WL 454519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1999 | Docket: 453158

Cited 8 times | Published

"intangible property right" not governed by section 725.01, Florida Statutes. An analysis of the subject

Moorings Ass'n v. Tortoise Island Communities

460 So. 2d 961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1984 | Docket: 1766410

Cited 8 times | Published

party to be charged to be legally enforceable. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (the Statute of Frauds). An "express

Perimeter Inv., Inc. v. Amerifirst Dev. Co., Etc.

423 So. 2d 586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1982 | Docket: 545102

Cited 8 times | Published

hornbook issue is whether the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981),[1] applies to litigation

CENTRAK NAT. BANK OF MIAMI v. Central Bancorp., Inc.

411 So. 2d 358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1982 | Docket: 1697074

Cited 8 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1979). We reject the argument

Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.

827 So. 2d 318, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13214, 2002 WL 31039451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2002 | Docket: 1726362

Cited 7 times | Published

than one year, and is therefore barred under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1996). In ruling on a motion

Posik v. Layton

695 So. 2d 759, 1997 WL 136208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1997 | Docket: 1522002

Cited 7 times | Published

must be in writing. The Statute of Frauds (section 725.01, Florida Statutes) requires that contracts

Tatum v. Dance

605 So. 2d 110, 1992 WL 192991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1992 | Docket: 1702170

Cited 7 times | Published

those which could satisfy the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1951); Moorings Association, Inc

RESORTS INTERN., INC. v. Charter Air Center, Inc.

503 So. 2d 1293, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 481, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1987 | Docket: 1452712

Cited 7 times | Published

third party falls within the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1983); see also 2 A. Corbin, Corbin

Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Tom Murphy Construction Company, Inc.

674 F.2d 880, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19645

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1982 | Docket: 252468

Cited 7 times | Published

diversity action, requires application of Fla.Stat. § 725.01 to an indemnification contract which required

WINTER SPRINGS, ETC. v. Florida Power Corp.

402 So. 2d 1225, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1981 | Docket: 160007

Cited 7 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977), because the alleged

Gladding Corporation v. Register

293 So. 2d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1974 | Docket: 1625846

Cited 7 times | Published

mandated by the Statute of Frauds, Fla. Stat. § 725.01, F.S.A. Eckman v. Brash, 20 Fla. 763 (1884), Delta

Wolf v. Cleveland Electric Co.

58 So. 2d 153, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1139

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1952 | Docket: 1733395

Cited 7 times | Published

action within the statute of frauds, to-wit, Section 725.01, F.S.A., and the Court being advised in the

Fi-Evergreen Woods, LLC v. Robinson

135 So. 3d 331, 2013 WL 5493462, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60239567

Cited 6 times | Published

documents that fall within the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2011), the Florida Arbitration

Topp, Inc. v. Uniden American Corp.

483 F. Supp. 2d 1187, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31204, 2007 WL 1119192

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2007 | Docket: 2204549

Cited 6 times | Published

applicable Florida Statutes of Frauds, Fla. Stat. § 725.01,[2] the general *1193 statute, and § 672.201,[3]

J Square Enterprises v. Regner

734 So. 2d 565, 1999 WL 355895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1999 | Docket: 1730837

Cited 6 times | Published

argues that the traditional Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, does not bar enforcement

Dupont v. Whiteside

721 So. 2d 1259, 1998 WL 890209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1998 | Docket: 2518344

Cited 6 times | Published

easement because of the Statute of Frauds. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1997). Due to the trial court's disposition

Johnson v. Edwards

569 So. 2d 928, 1990 WL 178652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1990 | Docket: 1190877

Cited 6 times | Published

contract was barred by the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes. He also argues that, even

Gerry v. Antonio

409 So. 2d 1181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1982 | Docket: 526144

Cited 6 times | Published

was in violation of the statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1979). *1183 When an oral

SOUTH FLA. APT. ASSOC., INC. v. Dansyear

347 So. 2d 710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1977 | Docket: 373482

Cited 6 times | Published

herein is barred by the statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1975). We affirm. The final

Langlois v. Oriole Land & Development Corp.

283 So. 2d 143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1973 | Docket: 1743433

Cited 6 times | Published

a contract. The Statute of Frauds (F.S.A., Section 725.01, F.S.A.) was not raised in the answer as an

St. Clair v. City Bank and Trust Co. of St. Petersburg

175 So. 2d 791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1965 | Docket: 1280884

Cited 6 times | Published

signed by the vendor as is required by Fla. Stat., § 725.01, F.S.A. Moreover, it is the general rule that

Orange State Oil Co. v. Crosby

36 So. 2d 273, 160 Fla. 664, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 828

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1948 | Docket: 3273867

Cited 6 times | Published

be granted because of the statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Fla. Stat., 1941, F.S.A. Appellant relies

Financial Healthcare Associates, Inc. v. Public Health Trust

488 F. Supp. 2d 1231, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39186, 2007 WL 1492889

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 18, 2007 | Docket: 2293948

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement or promise . . . [is] in writing. . . ." § 725.01, Fla. Stat. Here, the Contract was to be performed

Fresh Capital v. Bridgeport Capital

891 So. 2d 1142, 2005 WL 156737

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2005 | Docket: 1349895

Cited 5 times | Published

ground that it violated the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2001). The trial court granted

Lundstrom Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.

856 So. 2d 1117, 2003 WL 22400487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 43189

Cited 5 times | Published

shall be brought, ... shall be in writing.... § 725.01, Fla. Stat. When an oral agreement is silent as

Bergman v. DeIulio

826 So. 2d 500, 2002 WL 31114679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2002 | Docket: 1197533

Cited 5 times | Published

Roses, 565 So.2d 372, 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2002). The alleged partnership agreement

TLZ Properties v. Kilburn-Young Asset Management Corp.

937 F. Supp. 1573, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16684, 1996 WL 562068

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1996 | Docket: 2101537

Cited 5 times | Published

satisfy Florida's Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01 and is therefore unenforceable. (1) No "deed

Hospital Corp. v. ASSOC. IN ADOL. PSYCHIATRY

605 So. 2d 556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1992 | Docket: 1702353

Cited 5 times | Published

Florida's statute of frauds is codified at section 725.01, Florida Statutes, which provides in pertinent

Cherokee Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California

706 F. Supp. 826, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1896, 1989 WL 17039

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1989 | Docket: 389060

Cited 5 times | Published

claim is barred by Florida's statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes. Plaintiff has argued that

Odham v. Mouat

484 So. 2d 95, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 577

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1986 | Docket: 1343919

Cited 5 times | Published

contract and warranty counts) on the grounds that Section 725.01, Fla. Stat. prohibits any action against a

Valcin v. Public Health Trust of Dade County

473 So. 2d 1297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1985 | Docket: 1304742

Cited 5 times | Published

judgment entered on the breach of warranty count. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), effective May 20

Marx v. Redd

368 So. 2d 101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1979 | Docket: 1723403

Cited 5 times | Published

within the Statute of Frauds as provided in F.S. § 725.01. We have *104 reviewed the evidence and law in

First Gulf Beach Bank and Trust Co. v. Grubaugh

330 So. 2d 205

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1976 | Docket: 1774443

Cited 5 times | Published

to various sections of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., (Cf. Fletcher v. Williams

Gleason v. Leadership Housing, Inc.

327 So. 2d 101, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1976 | Docket: 1363984

Cited 5 times | Published

and CROSS, J., concur. NOTES [1] Fla. Stat. § 725.01 (1973).

Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. VANGUARD INVEST. CO. LTD.

298 So. 2d 515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1974 | Docket: 1730141

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement is barred by the statute of frauds, § 725.01, Fla. Stat. The salient portion of the trial court's

Rothman v. GOLD MASTER CORPORATION

287 So. 2d 735, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 9000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1974 | Docket: 656948

Cited 5 times | Published

was barred by the statute of frauds [Fla. Stat. § 725.01, F.S.A.], and (2) the complaint fails to state

Talmudical Academy of Baltimore v. Harris

238 So. 2d 161, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1970 | Docket: 552509

Cited 5 times | Published

to various sections of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., (Cf. Fletcher v. Williams

O'Shea v. O'Shea

221 So. 2d 223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1969 | Docket: 1202787

Cited 5 times | Published

work here locally? "A. That is right." [6] Section 725.01, F.S. 1967, F.S.A. [7] She was asked what

Gable v. Miller

104 So. 2d 358, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1468

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1958 | Docket: 60190446

Cited 5 times | Published

Butler, 1939, 138 Fla. 392, 189 So. 846; F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A. One of the reasons for condemnation of

Terzis v. Pompano Paint & Body Repair, Inc.

127 So. 3d 592, 2012 WL 6601316, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2012 | Docket: 60236778

Cited 4 times | Published

signed by the party to be charged therewith.... § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2008). Case law interpreting the

LaRue v. Kalex Construction & Development, Inc.

97 So. 3d 251, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13911, 2012 WL 3587263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311735

Cited 4 times | Published

salary increased from $140,000 to $180,000. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2010) (“the statute of frauds”)

Ala v. Chesser

5 So. 3d 715, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1248, 2009 WL 367769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2009 | Docket: 1199838

Cited 4 times | Published

person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). But Mr. Ala relies here on

Key v. Trattmann

959 So. 2d 339, 2007 WL 1517827

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2007 | Docket: 1525764

Cited 4 times | Published

of landwas barred by the statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2003), provides: No action

Cibran Enterprises, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc.

365 F. Supp. 2d 1241, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10922, 2005 WL 901037

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2005 | Docket: 2299221

Cited 4 times | Published

uncertain interest in or concerning them," Fla. Stat. § 725.01, or for personal property in excess of $5,000

Richey v. Modular Designs, Inc.

879 So. 2d 665, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11703, 2004 WL 1773534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2004 | Docket: 1514429

Cited 4 times | Published

action was barred by the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2000); and that the jury's

Allen v. Berry

765 So. 2d 121, 2000 WL 770517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2000 | Docket: 1522942

Cited 4 times | Published

writing requirement of the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. However, the evidence at trial was

Centro Nautico v. INTERN. MARINE CO-OP

719 So. 2d 967, 1998 WL 712696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1998 | Docket: 1352037

Cited 4 times | Published

against whom enforcement is sought...."). [3] § 725.01 Fla. Stat. (1997) ("No action shall be brought

Harrison v. Pritchett

682 So. 2d 650, 1996 WL 635086

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1996 | Docket: 1276161

Cited 4 times | Published

other person by him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). The alleged agreement in the

Wiborg v. Eisenberg

671 So. 2d 832, 1996 WL 164675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1996 | Docket: 1248119

Cited 4 times | Published

person by him thereunto lawfully authorized." § 725.01 Fla.Stat. (1993). It is well settled that a land

Chong v. Milano

623 So. 2d 536, 1993 WL 267457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1993 | Docket: 18030

Cited 4 times | Published

Florida's statute of frauds, contained in section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent

Brown v. Kelly

545 So. 2d 518, 1989 WL 72743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1989 | Docket: 1345443

Cited 4 times | Published

because it was not in writing as required by section 725.01, Florida Statutes, and none of the elements

Ramaria Familienstiftung v. United States

643 F. Supp. 139

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1501920

Cited 4 times | Published

therefore unenforceable under Florida law. Fla.Stat. 725.01 (1985). (b) It was not arms-length and was

Moraitis v. Galluzzo

487 So. 2d 1151, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1986 | Docket: 1796887

Cited 4 times | Published

sale of realty from the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985), a purchaser must

All Seasons Resorts v. DEPT. OF BUS. REG.

455 So. 2d 544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1984 | Docket: 1316714

Cited 4 times | Published

05(30); and 3) of accommodations or facilities, Section 725.01(1) and (16). There were no time-share periods

Craig R. Weiner Associates, Inc. v. Sherden

444 So. 2d 431, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1983 | Docket: 1510689

Cited 4 times | Published

and that is signed by the parties to be charged. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1981); Socarras. We believe that

Poinciana Properties, Ltd. v. Englander Triangle, Inc.

437 So. 2d 214, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1983 | Docket: 1675094

Cited 4 times | Published

statute of frauds. Florida's statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), provides that an

Unatin v. Hudon

383 So. 2d 1131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1980 | Docket: 457631

Cited 4 times | Published

assent as required by the Statute of Frauds. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977). Before a plaintiff

Rice v. Insurance & Bonds, Inc.

366 So. 2d 85, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1979 | Docket: 247477

Cited 4 times | Published

parties agree that the trial court applied Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977), which is: "No action

Jim & Slim's Tool Supply, Inc. v. METRO COMMUN. CORP.

328 So. 2d 213, 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 77

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1976 | Docket: 1699690

Cited 4 times | Published

contract was barred by the general Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, F.S. 1973, in that it was a special oral promise

Bader Brothers Transfer & Storage, Inc. v. Campbell

299 So. 2d 114, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1974 | Docket: 1499139

Cited 4 times | Published

required by the Statute of Frauds (Fla. Stat. § 725.01 F.S.A.) may consist of several writings containing

Troup Brothers, Inc. v. State

135 So. 2d 755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1961 | Docket: 1292656

Cited 4 times | Published

one of guaranty. Under our statute of frauds, § 725.01, F.S.A., this purported agreement was required

All Seasons Condo Assoc. v. Patrician Hotel

274 So. 3d 438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988984

Cited 3 times | Published

7Florida’s statute of frauds is outlined in section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2010), and provides in pertinent

U.S. Steel Mining Company, LLC v. Cassandra M. Terry

920 F.3d 1283

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 11, 2019 | Docket: 14920311

Cited 3 times | Published

its implementing regulations, 20 C.F.R. § 725.1 et seq. A District Director 1

Skylake Insurance Agency, Inc. v. NMB Plaza, LLC

23 So. 3d 175, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16078, 2009 WL 3446494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 1237680

Cited 3 times | Published

the lease satisfies the statute of frauds, see § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2003), because the landlord signed

City of Orlando v. West Orange Country Club, Inc.

9 So. 3d 1268, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3458, 2009 WL 1097260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2009 | Docket: 2198897

Cited 3 times | Published

the contract. This appeal followed. Analysis Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2007), sets forth Florida's

Marcus v. Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C.

441 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 2006 WL 2129630

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2006 | Docket: 2310091

Cited 3 times | Published

claims at issue are barred by Florida Statute Section 725.01 [statute of frauds], due to the undisputed

Alvarez v. Alvarez

800 So. 2d 280, 2001 WL 1230550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2001 | Docket: 1283278

Cited 3 times | Published

contracts to be in writing." Elsa relies on section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1991),[6] to support the

McCloud v. Davison

719 So. 2d 995, 1998 WL 754352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 1705225

Cited 3 times | Published

within the purview of the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1997), unless there is a

American Recycling Co., Inc. v. County of Manatee

963 F. Supp. 1572, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10995, 1997 WL 251462

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 6, 1997 | Docket: 1219767

Cited 3 times | Published

requirements of the Statute of Frauds, FLA. STAT. § 725.01, with the requirements of the Sunshine law, FLA

Hager v. Venice Hospital, Inc.

944 F. Supp. 1530, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16682, 1996 WL 650933

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1996 | Docket: 970429

Cited 3 times | Published

out that, under Florida's Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1995), all contracts that are not

Broward County v. Conner

660 So. 2d 288, 1995 WL 421154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1995 | Docket: 1640119

Cited 3 times | Published

land be signed by the party to be charged, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1993). We agree. Part performance

Kay v. Katzen

568 So. 2d 960, 1990 WL 143659

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1990 | Docket: 1526596

Cited 3 times | Published

sued upon was barred by the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1987). Contrary to the plaintiff's

Pino v. SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM OF FLA., INC.

564 So. 2d 186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1990 | Docket: 1294353

Cited 3 times | Published

assignment violated the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985), because the assignment

Otto L. Fox v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

889 F.2d 1037, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18196, 1989 WL 138884

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 6, 1989 | Docket: 503813

Cited 3 times | Published

20 C.F.R. § 725.1(b) (1988). 2 . See 20 C.F.R. § 725.1(d) (1988).

Olsen v. O'CONNELL

466 So. 2d 352, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 599

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1985 | Docket: 438766

Cited 3 times | Published

judgment lien violate the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01; Florida Statutes (1983)? Third, do appellees

Titan Agencies, Inc. v. S. Kornreich & Sons, Inc.

355 So. 2d 457, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1978 | Docket: 1715056

Cited 3 times | Published

expressed. Reversed and remanded. NOTES [1] Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1973), provides in part:

Katcher v. Sans Souci Company

200 So. 2d 826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1967 | Docket: 1687397

Cited 3 times | Published

necessary to create an oral easement (by estoppel). Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides in part:

GORDON INTERNAT'L ADV., INC. v. Charlotte County L. & T. Co.

170 So. 2d 59

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1964 | Docket: 438011

Cited 3 times | Published

Affirmed in part, reversed in part. NOTES [1] § 725.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A. [2] Rule 1.8(d) F.R.C.P.,

Miller v. Greene

104 So. 2d 457, 75 A.L.R. 2d 627

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1958 | Docket: 1312875

Cited 3 times | Published

applicability of that portion of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, F.S.A., which reads: "No action shall be brought

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. LARRY M. RICHARDS

226 So. 3d 920, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12465, 2017 WL 3727048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145374

Cited 2 times | Published

her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2016). This court has reversed enforcement

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Rreport No. 2012-08

131 So. 3d 692, 2013 WL 6124277

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2013 | Docket: 60238156

Cited 2 times | Published

Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01 Fla. Stat. “Financial harm” includes [extortionate

Brace v. Comfort

2 So. 3d 1007, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18073, 2008 WL 5070150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 1644212

Cited 2 times | Published

the language of Florida's statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2006), by concluding that

Guest v. Claycomb

932 So. 2d 567, 2006 WL 1788053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1285393

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida's statute of frauds is set forth in section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes (2005): 725.01. Promise

Gray v. Prime Management Group, Inc.

912 So. 2d 711, 2005 WL 2861297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2005 | Docket: 1755518

Cited 2 times | Published

reduced to writing in order to be *713 enforceable. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1997); Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic

Steinberg v. Kearns

907 So. 2d 691, 2005 WL 1812732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2005 | Docket: 459537

Cited 2 times | Published

the statute of frauds. The statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1997), provides in pertinent

Schroeder v. Manceri

893 So. 2d 603, 2005 WL 156712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2005 | Docket: 1720623

Cited 2 times | Published

oral contracts in certain other situations. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2003). However, the extension in

HW Gay Enterprises Inc. v. JOHN HALL ELEC. CONTRACTING INC.

792 So. 2d 580, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845, 2001 WL 864275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2001 | Docket: 1416697

Cited 2 times | Published

Section 682.02 is unlike the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2000), which requires that

Attanasio v. Excel Development Corp.

757 So. 2d 1253, 2000 WL 561854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 1331123

Cited 2 times | Published

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 725.01, Fla. Stat., the Statute of Frauds, provides

In Re Paxson Electric Co.

248 B.R. 451, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 190, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 502, 2000 WL 622698

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2000 | Docket: 1423259

Cited 2 times | Published

this action, is barred by the statute of frauds, § 725.01, Florida Statutes. 2. Summary Final Judgment is

Hertz v. Salman

718 So. 2d 942, 1998 WL 712737

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1998 | Docket: 2549757

Cited 2 times | Published

contract was barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1993). The record supports

Wilcox v. Lang Equities, Inc.

588 So. 2d 318, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11061, 1991 WL 225507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1991 | Docket: 64662718

Cited 2 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1989). Following denial

JF HOFF ELEC. CO. v. Goldstein

560 So. 2d 419, 1990 WL 58568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1990 | Docket: 1739490

Cited 2 times | Published

held the agreement was oral and thus barred by section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1987), as a collateral agreement

Hobco, Inc. v. Tallahassee Associates

807 F.2d 1529, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 819

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 8, 1987 | Docket: 805627

Cited 2 times | Published

ignored Florida’s Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 725.01 (West 1969), and mistakenly concluded that the

S. Lemel, Inc. v. 27th Avenue Farmers Market, Inc.

126 So. 2d 167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1961 | Docket: 1314845

Cited 2 times | Published

statute of frauds (Rev.Gen.St. 1920, § 3872 [F.S.A. § 725.01]). See Tate v. Jones, 16 Fla. 216; Maloy v. Boyett

Blynn v. Hirsch

124 So. 2d 314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1960 | Docket: 60195951

Cited 2 times | Published

within the purview of the statute of frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01. A distinction is generally recognized between

Lee v. Lee

263 So. 3d 826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2019 | Docket: 13588095

Cited 1 times | Published

the requirements of the statute of frauds, section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes.3 Even if Florida’s

Armao v. McKenney

218 So. 3d 481, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2017 | Docket: 60266211

Cited 1 times | Published

Additionally, nothing in the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, requires that such an agreement

Roach v. Totalbank

85 So. 3d 574, 2012 WL 1414275, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2012 | Docket: 60307388

Cited 1 times | Published

to be performed within one year of its making. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2008). The guarantors argue that

B & C Investors, Inc. v. Vojak

79 So. 3d 42, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 2011 WL 3477163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2011 | Docket: 60305328

Cited 1 times | Published

from the face of the complaint here because section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2007), requires that contracts

Ge Lin v. Ecclestone Signature Homes of Palm Beach, LLC

59 So. 3d 267, 74 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 293, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5206, 2011 WL 1376686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2011 | Docket: 1913699

Cited 1 times | Published

contained in section 725.01, Florida Statutes. Similar to section 672.201(1), section 725.01 requires that

DK Arena, Inc. v. EB ACQUISITIONS I, LLC

31 So. 3d 313, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4508, 2010 WL 1329371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2010 | Docket: 1647805

Cited 1 times | Published

person by her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2004). "`The statute of frauds grew

White v. Syfrett

955 So. 2d 1110, 2006 WL 3408098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2006 | Docket: 1659280

Cited 1 times | Published

"the party to be charged," signed the contract. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2002) ("No action shall be brought

Ballard-Cannon Dev. v. Sandman Properties

933 So. 2d 1251, 2006 WL 2040485

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2006 | Docket: 1712043

Cited 1 times | Published

unenforceable under Florida's statute of frauds. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2005). Appellees argue B-C waived

In Re Bayshore Yacht & Tennis Club Condominium Ass'n

336 B.R. 866, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 122, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 92

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 12, 2006 | Docket: 1775640

Cited 1 times | Published

frauds, and therefore, is unenforceable. See F.S.A. § 725.01 (2006)(stating that "any agreement that is not

American Zurich Insurance Co. v. St. George Crystal, Ltd.

870 So. 2d 243, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882, 2004 WL 592426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 64829658

Cited 1 times | Published

erred as a matter of law in determining that section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1997), barred American Zurich’s

Harris v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.

746 So. 2d 1152, 1999 WL 1037950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1999 | Docket: 1360563

Cited 1 times | Published

agreement and it violated the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1993), which prohibits an

Campo v. Tafur

704 So. 2d 730, 1998 WL 10882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1998 | Docket: 1706012

Cited 1 times | Published

is barred by section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1995), the Statute of Frauds. Section 725.01 requires that

Farrell v. Farrell

661 So. 2d 1257, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11329, 1995 WL 621760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 64759595

Cited 1 times | Published

it was violative of the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1993). The former husband

Verhaegen v. Montigny

553 So. 2d 756, 1989 WL 151460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1989 | Docket: 1259201

Cited 1 times | Published

contract was barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985); (2) the judgment

Goldman v. Citicorp Savings of Florida

552 So. 2d 1124, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2372, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5615, 1989 WL 118923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 64646583

Cited 1 times | Published

Goldman’s action was barred by the Statute of Frauds. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1987). The trial court granted summary

Suncrete Corp. v. Glusman (In Re Suncrete Corp.)

100 B.R. 102, 21 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 185, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 787, 1989 WL 54434

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 18, 1989 | Docket: 1744553

Cited 1 times | Published

to satisfy the statute of frauds set forth in § 725.01, Florida Statutes, would invalidate any assignment

The Doran Jason Company of Miami, Inc. v. Nils Lou, Ramma, n.v.--a Netherlands Antilles Corporation

868 F.2d 1547, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4577, 1989 WL 23806

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 5, 1989 | Docket: 498234

Cited 1 times | Published

. The Florida statute of frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01 states in pertinent part: No action shall

Rozema v. Wilson

419 So. 2d 1139, 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1982 | Docket: 1584919

Cited 1 times | Published

the agreement arguing the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, in a motion for partial

Brickell Townhouse, Inc. v. Hirschfield

404 So. 2d 153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1981 | Docket: 1782805

Cited 1 times | Published

enforcement because of the statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1979); Rundel v. Gordon

Clover Interior Systems v. Gen. Devel. Corp.

357 So. 2d 459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1978 | Docket: 106864

Cited 1 times | Published

unenforceable under the statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1973). On reviewing a directed

Davis v. Ferraro

303 So. 2d 407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1974 | Docket: 1314069

Cited 1 times | Published

which brought the matter within the prohibition of § 725.01, Fla. Stat. There being no written memorandum

Baya v. Price

222 So. 2d 253, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1969 | Docket: 64509651

Cited 1 times | Published

is governed by the Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01, F.S.A. which provides as follows: “No action

Sill v. Ocala Jewelers, Inc.

210 So. 2d 458, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1968 | Docket: 64505350

Cited 1 times | Published

CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ-, concur. . F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A. . Brune v. Vom Lelm, 112 Misc. 342,

Trans World Marine Corp. v. Threlkeld

201 So. 2d 614, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1967 | Docket: 64502040

Cited 1 times | Published

failure to comply with the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. This motion was denied, as

Lucca v. Flamingo Corp.

121 So. 2d 803, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2283

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1960 | Docket: 60195264

Cited 1 times | Published

comes within the purview of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla.Stat, F.S.A., an action for damages for the

Williams v. Noel

105 So. 2d 901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1958 | Docket: 1542648

Cited 1 times | Published

Appellant's argument that the Statute of Frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01 was not complied with was without merit, because

Taxinet Corp. v. Santiago Leon

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 19, 2024 | Docket: 67818684

Published

Argued: Sep 21, 2023

party to be charged therewith.” Fla. Stat. § 725.01. If “full performance is possible within one year

PIAL HOLDINGS, LTD v. RIVERFRONT PLAZA, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2024 | Docket: 68195725

Published

be in writing, and the guarantor must sign it. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2017). The “writing” must contain

DANELIA GOMEZ v. CARLOS GOMEZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2023 | Docket: 67229748

Published

trust on allegations sounding in unjust 1 § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2017).

INLET COLONY, LLC v. WIGHT MARTINDALE, III

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2022 | Docket: 63352050

Published

the requirements of the Statute of Frauds. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2020) (“No action shall be brought

FRANK E. WALSH, III v. KIMBERLY ABATE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE 3388 BARROW ISLAND TRUST

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2022 | Docket: 63180115

Published

her or him thereunto lawfully authorized. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2020). Appellant seeks to obtain

ZEEV SEGAL, etc. v. FORASTERO, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2021 | Docket: 59954626

Published

by the party to be charged therewith . . . .” § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2016). It is undisputed that no

Oj Commerce, LLC v. Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc.

359 F. Supp. 3d 1163

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2018 | Docket: 64322708

Published

him thereunto lawfully authorized. Fla. Stat. § 725.01 The Supreme Court of Florida further clarified:

Jester v. Pawley

245 So. 3d 859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2018 | Docket: 6280846

Published

as they are barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2016). See Canell v. Arcola

Bernacchi v. Cascio (In re Cascio)

568 B.R. 851

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2017 | Docket: 65789773

Published

signed by the party to be charged. Fla. Stat. § 725.01. Under Florida law, a party cannot circumvent

Abundant Living Citi Church, Inc. v. Abundant Living Ministries, Inc.

213 So. 3d 1055, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3104, 2017 WL 927813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2017 | Docket: 4615312

Published

in writing and signed by the party to be bound. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2006).

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—INSTRUCTION 29.24

200 So. 3d 754, 2016 WL 4916757

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2016 | Docket: 4422156

Published

Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01 Fla. Stat. “Financial harm” includes [extortionate

Lobree v. Ardenx LLC

199 So. 3d 1094, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416, 2016 WL 4645407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4419700

Published

any counts based on the statute of frauds (section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2014)); or - seek dismissal

Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Jean Marie Delvar a/k/a Jean Delvar

180 So. 3d 1190, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18411, 2015 WL 8347300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2015 | Docket: 3019338

Published

oral *1192 ly modified violates section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2013). 1 We also

Heldt-Pope v. Thibault

198 So. 3d 650, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17048, 2015 WL 7074662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2015 | Docket: 3012525

Published

satisfy the statute of frauds. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2011) (requiring, in pertinent part

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2014-08

176 So. 3d 938, 2015 WL 5853925

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2015 | Docket: 2866126

Published

Insert explanation of the statute of frauds from § 725.01 Fla. Stat. “Financial harm” includes [extortionate

Loper v. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc.

203 So. 3d 898, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2015 | Docket: 60257474

Published

trial court ruled that the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, barred the enforcement of

Cohen v. Corbitt

135 So. 3d 527, 2014 WL 1307354, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2014 | Docket: 60239680

Published

the conclusion of the trial proceedings, that section 725.01, Florida Statutes, bars lawsuits upon promises

Browning v. Poirier

128 So. 3d 144, 2013 WL 5950842, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2013 | Docket: 60236994

Published

performed within [a year].” (Emphasis added). Section 725.01 provides in relevant part that: No action shall

Hedge Capital Investment Ltd. v. Sustainable Growth Group Holdings LLC

952 F. Supp. 2d 1300, 2013 WL 3376776

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2013 | Docket: 65992211

Published

him thereunto lawfully authorized.” Fla. Stat. § 725.01. “[T]he Statute of Frauds is a legislative prerogative

Browning v. Poirier

113 So. 3d 976, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3745, 2013 WL 842853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2013 | Docket: 60231677

Published

resolve. The statute of frauds is found in section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2007), and provides in pertinent

Tydir v. Williams

89 So. 3d 1129, 2012 WL 2203045, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2012 | Docket: 60308569

Published

the jury’s verdict, and this appeal ensued. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, Florida’s “Statute of Frauds

Marshall-Beasley v. Beasley

77 So. 3d 751, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19534, 2011 WL 6057910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2011 | Docket: 60304779

Published

stipulation on the record before a court reporter. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. This alleged joint stipulation had

Brodie v. All Corp. of USA

876 So. 2d 577, 2004 WL 1103455

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2011 | Docket: 1245033

Published

on counts VI-VII, based on Florida Statutes section 725.01, the Statute of Frauds provision relating to

101 Monument Road, Inc. v. Delta Property Management, Inc.

993 So. 2d 181, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16979, 2008 WL 4791006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2008 | Docket: 64856258

Published

conveyance of land is barred by the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). However, Delta overcame Monument’s

HPBC, INC. v. Nor-Tech Powerboats, Inc.

946 So. 2d 1108, 2006 WL 3524019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2006 | Docket: 1771628

Published

we need not address the second. Analysis Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2005), provides: No action

Sanchez v. Mondy

936 So. 2d 35, 2006 WL 1999373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2006 | Docket: 1161126

Published

testimony. NOTES [1] The trial court cited to section 725.01 Florida Statutes, which is a part of the Florida

In re Erkins

343 B.R. 298, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 302, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1251, 2006 WL 1555769

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2006 | Docket: 65782979

Published

because it is barred by the Statute of Frauds. Fla. Stat. 725.01 et seq. In opposition to the Motion, the Law

Martinez v. Lieberman

920 So. 2d 128, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 690, 2006 WL 168002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 64842160

Published

So.2d 462, 464-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2004), any agreement that

May v. Allapattah Properties Partnership

867 So. 2d 442, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 938, 2004 WL 231249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2004 | Docket: 64828610

Published

Partnership moved for summary judgment pursuant to section 725.01, Florida Statutes (2003), and attached an affidavit

Lindros v. Backus

848 So. 2d 413, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9458, 2003 WL 21466963

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2003 | Docket: 64823768

Published

satisfy the requirements of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Florida Statutes, in that the plaintiff failed

Evans v. Hicks

837 So. 2d 610, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1993, 2003 WL 365980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 64820762

Published

proposal failed to comport with Florida Statutes § 725.01, and was neither accepted, nor delivered, the

Wilkerson v. Intellikey Corp.

808 So. 2d 275, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2483, 2002 WL 445284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2002 | Docket: 64812812

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (2000); Fox v. Sails at Laguna Club Dev. Corp., 403 So

Kersey v. Kersey

802 So. 2d 523, 2001 WL 1661467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2001 | Docket: 1698761

Published

unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1999); (2) ordering a distribution

Tire Group International, Inc. v. Confianca Mudancas & Transportes

776 So. 2d 1057, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1077, 2001 WL 99162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 64803393

Published

non-residents engaging in business in Florida. See § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1999). Second, the trial court must

State, Department of Transportation v. Lakepointe Associates

745 So. 2d 364, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13150, 1999 WL 781575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1999 | Docket: 64792383

Published

contract, not to the offer to make a contract. See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1997); Richard A. Lord, Williston

In Re Paxson Electric Co.

242 B.R. 67, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 61, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1571, 1999 WL 1215747

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1999 | Docket: 1451330

Published

this action, is barred by the statute of frauds, § 725.01, Florida Statutes. 2. Summary Final Judgment is

Elliot v. Winslow

737 So. 2d 609, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9692, 1999 WL 510587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 64789457

Published

signed by the party to be charged therewith.... ” § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1997). In Gulf Solar, Inc. v. Westfall

Anglo American Auto Auctions, Inc. v. Tuminello

732 So. 2d 1218, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7461, 1999 WL 355814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1999 | Docket: 64788343

Published

the statute of frauds provision set forth in section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1995), was an appropriate

Patterson v. Madigan

693 So. 2d 137, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5117, 1997 WL 249139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 64773353

Published

CURIAM. Affirmed. § 689.01, Fla. Stat. (1996); § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1996).

C & A v. CI Seafoods, Inc.

683 So. 2d 1123, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1996 | Docket: 64769448

Published

claims on the basis of the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1991). AFFIRMED.

In re Blackwell & Walker, P.A.

201 B.R. 581, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 94, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1277, 1996 WL 591070

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 65781423

Published

guaranties that satisfy the writing requirement of § 725.01 (Statute of Frauds), Florida Statutes (1995).

Kulp v. Gailey Industries, Inc.

656 So. 2d 279, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6699, 1995 WL 366717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1995 | Docket: 64757172

Published

Zeskind, 315 So.2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1994).

Shiley v. North American Directories

652 So. 2d 987, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3654, 1995 WL 170372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1995 | Docket: 64755263

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1993); Miller Constr. Co. v. First Indus. Technology

Magrann v. Epes

646 So. 2d 760, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10712, 1994 WL 600815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1994 | Docket: 64752745

Published

letter of November 9 was unenforceable under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1987), the statute of frauds

Jupiter Hills Club, Inc. v. Brinsfield

643 So. 2d 710, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9980, 1994 WL 568095

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1994 | Docket: 64751438

Published

governed by the club’s governing documents, nor section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1989). Instead, we find

Spaziani v. Bancroft

618 So. 2d 744, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4515, 1993 WL 125160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1993 | Docket: 64696424

Published

00 Million. (R 653). The statute of frauds, section 725.01, provides in part as follows: 725.01. Promise

Bross v. Wallace

600 So. 2d 1198, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5786, 1992 WL 111384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1992 | Docket: 64668533

Published

would not be barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01 of the Florida Stat*1199utes (1991). See Yates

Redd v. Talley

584 So. 2d 616, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7935, 1991 WL 151977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 64660966

Published

property, the oral contract is not enforceable. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1989), provides that no

Carole Korn Interiors, Inc. v. Goudie

573 So. 2d 923, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9642, 1990 WL 212030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1990 | Docket: 64656032

Published

frauds bars CKI’s claim as a matter of law, citing § 725.01, Florida Statutes (1987), and Ball v. Yates, 158

Pino v. Spanish Broadcasting System of Florida, Inc.

564 So. 2d 186, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1990 | Docket: 64651624

Published

assignment violated the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985), because the assignment

Porry v. Ludwig

564 So. 2d 526, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4367, 1990 WL 82478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1990 | Docket: 64651844

Published

Statute of Frauds for the sale of real property. § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1985). The trial court granted the

Muskat v. Burger King Corp.

550 So. 2d 1177, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5980, 1989 WL 125811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1989 | Docket: 64645827

Published

Corporation, 242 So.2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1987).

Cupeiro v. Baron

555 So. 2d 370, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2399, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5698, 1989 WL 118934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 64647482

Published

Yates v. Ball, 132 Fla. 132, 181 So. 341 (1937); § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1987), is taken "out of the statute”

First D.M.V., Inc. v. Amster

545 So. 2d 936, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1318, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3040, 1989 WL 56018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1989 | Docket: 64643435

Published

Lines, Ltd., 462 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1983). We find no error

Riba v. Pila

543 So. 2d 429, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1242, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2868, 1989 WL 52141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1989 | Docket: 64642618

Published

is unenforceable under the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1985). See Clover Interior Sys., Inc

McGee v. Emmer Development Corp.

541 So. 2d 1292, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 893, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1903, 1989 WL 34510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1989 | Docket: 64641983

Published

land. Normally, the statute of frauds defense, section 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1987), would act to bar a cause

Village at Lake Boca Rio, Inc. v. Milici

527 So. 2d 960, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1571, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2833, 1988 WL 68513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1988 | Docket: 64635777

Published

as precluding summary judgment pursuant to section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985). I agree with the

Allen v. Rosen

526 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1471, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2674, 1988 WL 62008

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1988 | Docket: 64635497

Published

following provision of the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985): “No action shall

Renfro v. Dodge

520 So. 2d 690, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 575, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1988 WL 15437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1988 | Docket: 64632901

Published

beneficiary were barred by section 732.701 and/or section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1985). A non-jury trial

Al Booth's, Inc. v. Boyd-Scarp Enterprises Inc.

518 So. 2d 422, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 25, 1988 WL 205

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1988 | Docket: 64631992

Published

statute of frauds. *423Our statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part

Port Charlotte Bank & Trust Co. v. Ballenger Corp. (In re T & B General Contracting, Inc.)

833 F.2d 1455, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16233

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 1987 | Docket: 66230782

Published

considered a financing agreement, Florida Statutes § 725.01, Florida’s Statute of Frauds, renders it unenforceable

Port Charlotte Bank & Trust Co. v. Ballenger Corp. (In re T & B General Contracting, Inc.)

833 F.2d 1455, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16233

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 1987 | Docket: 66230782

Published

considered a financing agreement, Florida Statutes § 725.01, Florida’s Statute of Frauds, renders it unenforceable

Florida Power & Light Co. v. American Ltd.

511 So. 2d 1103, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2117, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1987 | Docket: 1700941

Published

sustain the trial judge's result. NOTES [1] See § 725.01, Fla. Stat. (1985).

Somoza v. Solis

511 So. 2d 618, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9261, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1987 | Docket: 64628960

Published

evidenced by some written note or memorandum, § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1979), nonetheless, we find no competent

Siler v. All Pro Realty Service, Inc.

491 So. 2d 331, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1571, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1986 | Docket: 64620584

Published

conclude there was no contract and reverse. Under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1983), no action shall be

Manaster v. Coletta

490 So. 2d 243, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1986 | Docket: 64620213

Published

v. Bethel, 341 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Ace Electric Supply Co. v. PJ & L Associates (In re Desco Marine, Inc.)

58 B.R. 40, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6826

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1986 | Docket: 65779109

Published

the plaintiff, from Charles Stevens of Deseo. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, renders unenforceable, “any

Swartz v. Russell

481 So. 2d 64, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 55, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1985 | Docket: 64616570

Published

argue, is in violation of the statute of frauds, § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1983), and therefore unenforceable

Review Financial Printers, Inc. v. Feldman

478 So. 2d 517, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 64615543

Published

Baya v. Price, 222 So.2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Green v. New Trend Development Corp.

456 So. 2d 589, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2112, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1984 | Docket: 64607042

Published

defendants-appellees on the sole ground that Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977), rendered unenforceable

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. L & T, Inc.

455 So. 2d 1074, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1886, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1984 | Docket: 64606802

Published

another in violation of the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes; and (2) the oral settlement

Chippas v. Midland Insurance Co.

456 So. 2d 495, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1879, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1984 | Docket: 64607008

Published

violation of the statute of frauds. Fla.Stat. § 725.01, F.S.A. 425 F.2d at 439. Moreover, in this situation

Consolidated Capital Corp. v. Chernoff

452 So. 2d 604, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1984 | Docket: 64605768

Published

in effect found that the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), did not bar appellee’s

Saints In Christ, Temple of the Holy Ghost v. Fowler

448 So. 2d 1158, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1984 | Docket: 64604313

Published

agreement for deed was unenforceable under Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (statute of frauds), because

City of Clewiston v. B & B Cash Grocery Stores, Inc.

445 So. 2d 1038, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1984 | Docket: 64603124

Published

year as contemplated by the statute of frauds. § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981). As evidence of the parties’

American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc.

441 So. 2d 1153, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1983 | Docket: 64601349

Published

independent consideration running to the guarantor. § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981); Baya v. Price, 222 So.2d 258

Conger Life Insurance Co. v. Deimel

441 So. 2d 1116, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1983 | Docket: 64601334

Published

trial court ruled that the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), was no bar to enforcement

Pepe v. Shepherd

422 So. 2d 910, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21396

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 64593717

Published

by the statute of frauds if not in writing, see § 725.01 Fla.Stat. (1979), but instead is merely the obligors’

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Tom Murphy Construction Co.

674 F.2d 880

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 1982 | Docket: 66191640

Published

diversity action, requires application of Fla.Stat. § 725.01 to an indemnification contract which required

Miami Purveyors, Inc. v. Forte

407 So. 2d 330, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1981 | Docket: 64586773

Published

unenforceable under either Section 672.201 or Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977), because not in writing

Miley v. Miley

402 So. 2d 557, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1981 | Docket: 64584677

Published

consideration was barred by the statute of frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1979). Ap-pellee alleged

Canal Authority v. Ocala Manufacturing Co.

365 So. 2d 1060, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 13944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1979 | Docket: 64567840

Published

1953) nor violative of the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977). The agreement for

Lanier v. Poppell

359 So. 2d 20, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1978 | Docket: 64564619

Published

barred by the Statute of Frauds, now found in Section 725.01, *21Florida Statutes (1977). The parties agree

Dorsey v. Behm

356 So. 2d 345, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1978 | Docket: 64563388

Published

an easement violates the statute of frauds. Section 725.-01, Florida Statutes (1975), and Florida Real

Wolf v. Malevani

343 So. 2d 949, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1977 | Docket: 64557714

Published

barred from recovery by the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1975). After hearing argument

Wolf v. Malevani

343 So. 2d 949, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1977 | Docket: 64557714

Published

barred from recovery by the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1975). After hearing argument

Dworkin v. Alamo Auto Leasing, Inc.

334 So. 2d 77, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1976 | Docket: 64554214

Published

under the oral employment contract is barred by § 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See Yates v. Ball, 132 Fla

Goldstein v. Abco Construction Co.

334 So. 2d 281, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1976 | Docket: 64554324

Published

was unenforceable under the statute of frauds, § 725.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The motion to dismiss was granted

Powell v. Green

330 So. 2d 74, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1976 | Docket: 64553221

Published

comes within the purview of the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., an action for damages for

Green v. Royal Palm Beach Colony, Inc.

292 So. 2d 388, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1974 | Docket: 64538119

Published

declared upon was barred by the statute of frauds, § 725.01 Fla.Stat., F. S.A. Relied upon by the plaintiff

LC Morris, Inc. v. Allison

277 So. 2d 28

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1973 | Docket: 1440307

Published

real property is within the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01 F.S.A., and is therefore unenforceable. See

Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.

270 So. 2d 396

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1972 | Docket: 64529291

Published

lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. 1; Miller v. Murray (Fla.1954) 68 So

United States Concrete Pipe Co. v. Utility Systems, Inc.

269 So. 2d 382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1972 | Docket: 64528822

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Section 725.01, F.S.1971, F.S.A. REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur

Finn Machinery Co. v. Superior Crane, Inc.

265 So. 2d 712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1972 | Docket: 64527289

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Section 725.01 Florida Statutes, F.S.A. (Statute of Frauds

Carnes v. Harris

256 So. 2d 237, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1972 | Docket: 64523757

Published

support our view. Under the Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the rule is well settled that

Martyn v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

257 So. 2d 576, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1971 | Docket: 64524269

Published

we opine flatly that the statute of frauds, F.S. 725.01, F.S. A., does not bar a suit for damages upon

Heinl v. Fulmer-Vance, Inc.

255 So. 2d 281, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1971 | Docket: 64523331

Published

sufficient memorandum to meet the Statute of Frauds, Section 725.01, F.S. 1957, F.S.A. The second question is whether

Katz v. Mendheim

244 So. 2d 560, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 7043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1971 | Docket: 64518987

Published

it *562was within the statute of frauds.1 See § 725.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The lease, which was not in

Karwowski v. Peterman

238 So. 2d 323, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1970 | Docket: 64516110

Published

party to another is rendered unenforceable by Section 725.01 Fla.Stat., F. S.A. See also, 7 Fla.Jur. Statute

Niagara of Florida, Inc. v. Niagara Therapy Manufacturing Corp.

231 So. 2d 277, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1970 | Docket: 64513126

Published

sued upon was within the Statute of Frauds, F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A. Appellant Harrison testified that it was

Van Iderstyne v. Brumos Porsche Corp.

227 So. 2d 64

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1969 | Docket: 64511649

Published

lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and

Fixel v. Steingold

226 So. 2d 269, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1969 | Docket: 64511249

Published

security for the corporation’s indebtedness. See § 725.01 and § 689.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Affirmed.

Besco Electric Supply Co. v. Moses

226 So. 2d 5, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1969 | Docket: 64511166

Published

because the 1963 lease was never executed by it. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides: “No action

Hibben v. City of Fort Lauderdale

222 So. 2d 245, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1969 | Docket: 64509644

Published

to recover was within the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, F.S.1967, F.S.A. We affirm the judgment appealed

Avery v. Marine Bank & Trust Co.

216 So. 2d 251, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1968 | Docket: 64507478

Published

axiomatic that, under the Statute of Frauds, F.S. § 725.01 F.S.A., a mere oral contract for sale of lands

News Shopper, Inc. v. Palm Springs Mile Merchants Ass'n

209 So. 2d 679, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1968 | Docket: 64505024

Published

Osteopathic Hospital, Inc., Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 777; § 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Rovin v. Garfield

207 So. 2d 10, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1968 | Docket: 64504004

Published

the purview of the Florida Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla. Stat. F.S.A. and (3) that the equities in

Manas v. Southern Diversified Industries, Inc.

193 So. 2d 480, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1967 | Docket: 64499274

Published

This amount was in addition to his salary. Section 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the Florida statute of

A. H. Patten & Co. v. Trulis

185 So. 2d 183, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1966 | Docket: 64496396

Published

issues of fact were raised, including whether § 725.01 applies, and that the defendant was not entitled

Juliana, Inc. v. Salzman

181 So. 2d 3, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1965 | Docket: 64494951

Published

Products & Service, Ltd.) must be in writing. Section 725.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Since the guaranty

Fuller v. Olive

158 So. 2d 547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1963 | Docket: 60217305

Published

the operation of the Statute of Fi-auds, to-wit: § 725.01, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. From our review of the partial

Rattan & Bamboo Shop, Inc. v. Rutter

147 So. 2d 11

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1962 | Docket: 60208373

Published

an oral agreement within the Statute of Frauds (§ 725.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) in that it was an “ * * *

Markowitz Bros. v. John A. Volpe Construction Co.

209 F. Supp. 339, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3518

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1962 | Docket: 66019650

Published

Florida version of the Statute of Frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01. The court has heard argument of counsel, has

Croom-Johnson, Inc. v. Rand Broadcasting Co.

139 So. 2d 741, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1962 | Docket: 60203441

Published

plaintiff’s cause came within the purview of Section 725.01, *743F.S.A., and in view of the defendant s

Larnel Builders, Inc. v. United States Concrete Pipe Co.

117 So. 2d 438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1960 | Docket: 60194162

Published

within the purview of the Statute of Frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01. See Foley Lumber Co. v. Koester, Fla.1952, 61

Carson v. Tanner

101 So. 2d 811, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1662

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1958 | Docket: 60189835

Published

(2) Is oral evidence permissible in view of Section 725.01, Fla.Stats., F.S.A. (Statute of Frauds) to

Green v. Price

63 So. 2d 337, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1108

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1953 | Docket: 64484031

Published

requirements of the Statute of Frauds, F.S.A. § 725.01, are met. It appears that Hattie E. Phippen, a

Bensam Corp. v. Felton

63 So. 2d 278, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1090

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1953 | Docket: 64484017

Published

of Frauds and hence was not enforceable. See Section 725.01, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A.; Sanders v.

Cook v. Federal Const. Co.

44 So. 2d 650, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1446

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1949 | Docket: 3260386

Published

by the party to be charged" as prescribed by Section 725.01, F.S. 1941 F.S.A., (Statute of Frauds) and

Danas v. Calio

30 So. 2d 915, 158 Fla. 902, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 666

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1947 | Docket: 3276704

Published

construed with regard to our statute of frauds. Section 725.01, Fla. Stat., 1941, F.S.A. From the foregoing