Florida Statute 726.110 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLI
STATUTE OF FRAUDS, FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS, AND GENERAL ASSIGNMENTS

Chapter 726
FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 726.110

726.110 Extinguishment of cause of action.—A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished unless action is brought:

(1) Under s. 726.105(1)(a), within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within 1 year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant;

(2) Under s. 726.105(1)(b) or s. 726.106(1), within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or

(3) Under s. 726.106(2), within 1 year after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.

History.—s. 10, ch. 87-79.

F.S. 726.110 on Google Scholar

F.S. 726.110 on Casetext

Amendments to 726.110

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 726.110

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 726.110.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 726.110

Total Results: 14

Capital Building LLC v. Fortune Ocean, LLLP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-10

Snippet: So. 3d 498, 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“[S]ection 726.110(1) does not provide for separate periods of limitations

ADA TURKISH TRASK 2005 TRUST NUMBER ONE, etc. v. ELLEN TURKISH

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-05-04

Snippet: Creditor’s claims are extinguished by section 726.110, which contains certain time limits for bringing

JOHN G. MCGREGOR v. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-12-01

Snippet: were time barred by the application of section 726.110, Florida Statutes. Background and the

UOWEIT, LLC v. THOMAS W. FLEMING, ROBIN FLEMING and CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-07-22

Snippet: Analysis The creditor argues that section 726.110, Florida Statutes (2018), is inapplicable to proceedings

MYRTLE GANNON v. JOHN CUCKLER, M. D.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-16

Snippet: irrelevant, however, because the text of section 726.110(1) is unambiguous."). In the end, the cases

Glover v. Glover

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-28

Citation: 221 So. 3d 687, 2017 WL 2814886, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9421

Snippet: action was barred by the statute of limitations. § 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2014). None of the issues appellant

Preudhomme v. Bailey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-01

Citation: 211 So. 3d 127, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1150

Snippet: trial court for further determinations). See § 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2015). However, the *133statute of

National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-03-30

Citation: 192 So. 3d 498, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4820, 2016 WL 1238265

Snippet: was or could reasonably have been discovered.” § 726.110(1). This case presents two issues of first impression

Bedwell v. Rucks

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-31

Citation: 127 So. 3d 533, 2012 WL 5349381, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18963

Snippet: transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.” § 726.110(2), Fla. Stat. (2010) (emphasis added); see also

Desak v. Vanlandingham

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-05

Citation: 98 So. 3d 710, 2012 WL 4746471, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16833

Snippet: “reasonably have been discovered by the claimant,” § 726.110(1), Fla. Stat. (2002), “within 1 year after the

Calarese v. Weissfisch

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-23

Citation: 87 So. 3d 1225, 2012 WL 1859417, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8135

Snippet: fraudulent transfer claim is barred by section 726.110, Florida Statutes (2009), which extinguishes a

Paragon Health Services, Inc. v. CENTRAL PALM BEACH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-11-12

Citation: 859 So. 2d 1233, 2003 WL 22658104

Snippet: the statute of limitations contained in section 726.110(3), Florida Statutes (2001). Paragon responded

Moran v. Schurger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-07-23

Citation: 849 So. 2d 1184, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11076, 2003 WL 21697321

Snippet: believe that the debtor was insolvent. Under Section 726.110(3), Florida Statutes(“Extinguishment of cause of

Snellgrove v. Fogazzi

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-03-24

Citation: 616 So. 2d 527, 1993 WL 80630

Snippet: upon retroactive application of FUFTA. Section 726.110, Florida Statutes (1991) provides: A cause of action