Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 726.110 (2025)

Extinguishment of cause of action.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

726.110 Extinguishment of cause of action.—A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished unless action is brought:

(1) Under s. 726.105(1)(a), within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within 1 year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant;

(2) Under s. 726.105(1)(b) or s. 726.106(1), within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or

(3) Under s. 726.106(2), within 1 year after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.

History.—s. 10, ch. 87-79.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 67 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: Nat'l Auto Serv. Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat'l Auto Serv. Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). · cites it 85× “§ 726.110. Causes of action for actual fraudulent transfers are the only actions under FUFTA that have the benefit of a one-year savings clause based on the date “the transfer .”

Paragon Health Servs., Inc. v. Cent. Palm Beach Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 859 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). · cites it 13× “§ 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2001). While section 726.”

Woodard v. Stewart (In Re Stewart), 280 B.R. 268 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001). · cites it 8× “” Fla. Stat. § 726.110 . In this case, Barbara Stewart contends that she learned of the transfers of the Debtor’s assets no earlier than December of 1993.”

IBT Int'l, Inc. v. N. (In Re Int'l Admin. Servs., Inc.), 408 F.3d 689 (11th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “What Defendants fail to recognize is that the second clause of Fla. Stat. § 726.110 (1), provides an exception to the general limitations period, where the claimant could not reasonably have discovered the relevant transfers.”

Jones v. MTLC Inv., Ltd. (In Re Hill), 332 B.R. 835 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005). · cites it 13× “The applicable limitation for fraudulent transfer actions is contained in Fla. Stat. § 726.110 . Real Estate Corp. of Florida v.”

Desak v. Vanlandingham, 98 So. 3d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). · cites it 7× “We have found no Florida case holding that merely recording a deed that accomplishes a fraudulent transfer causes the § 726.110 limitations period to begin to run.”

Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 86 F. Supp. 3d 1316 (M.D. Fla. 2015). · cites it 4× “Fla. Stat. § 726.110 (1) (claims barred unless asserted within “4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within 1 year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant”).”

Forman v. Jeffrey Matthews Fin. Grp., LLC (In Re Halpert & Co.), 254 B.R. 104 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1999). · cites it 7× “25:2-31(a) or Fla. Stat. Ann. § 726.110 .” Trustee’s Brief, at 24.”

Soifer v. Bozarth (In re Lydia Cladek, Inc.), 494 B.R. 555 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013). · cites it 12× “§ 546 (a) and Fla. Stat. § 726.110 , the “reach back” period for fraudulent transfers under § 544 and Florida law is generally four years prior to the petition date.”

Welch v. Regions Bank (In re Mongelluzzi), 591 B.R. 480 (2018). “Fla. Stat. § 726.110 . 11 U.S.C. § 548 (a)(1).”

Mukamal v. Citibank N.A. (In re Kipnis), 555 B.R. 877 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2016). · cites it 2× “106 of the Florida Statutes, unless the claims are barred by the four year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. § 726.110 (l)-(2). If the statute of limitations applies, the avoidance claims must be dismissed.”

Feltman v. Warmus (In Re Am. Way Serv. Corp.), 229 B.R. 496 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 1999). · cites it 2× “See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 726.110(1) (four year limitation period); see also Govaert v.”

Show all 67 citing cases →

— 726.110(1) — 19 cases

Nat'l Auto Serv. Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC, 192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). “§ 726.110. Causes of action for actual fraudulent transfers are the only actions under FUFTA that have the benefit of a one-year savings clause based on the date “the transfer .”

Jones v. MTLC Inv., Ltd. (In Re Hill), 332 B.R. 835 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005). “The applicable limitation for fraudulent transfer actions is contained in Fla. Stat. § 726.110 . Real Estate Corp. of Florida v.”

Desak v. Vanlandingham, 98 So. 3d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). “We have found no Florida case holding that merely recording a deed that accomplishes a fraudulent transfer causes the § 726.110 limitations period to begin to run.”

Woodard v. Stewart (In Re Stewart), 280 B.R. 268 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001). “” Fla. Stat. § 726.110 . In this case, Barbara Stewart contends that she learned of the transfers of the Debtor’s assets no earlier than December of 1993.”

Paragon Health Servs., Inc. v. Cent. Palm Beach Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 859 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “§ 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2001). While section 726.”

— 726.110(2) — 4 cases

Paragon Health Servs., Inc. v. Cent. Palm Beach Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 859 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “§ 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2001). While section 726.”

Bedwell v. Rucks, 127 So. 3d 533 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Sale v. Ferrari Fin. Servs., Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2020).

Ada Turkish Trask 2005 Trust No. One, Etc. v. Ellen Turkish (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

— 726.110(3) — 3 cases

Paragon Health Servs., Inc. v. Cent. Palm Beach Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 859 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “§ 726.110, Fla. Stat. (2001). While section 726.”

Moran v. Schurger, 849 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Wesolek v. Wesolek (M.D. Fla. 2020).

— 726.110(l) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.