Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 733.702 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 733.702 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 733.702

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLII
ESTATES AND TRUSTS
Chapter 733
PROBATE CODE: ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 733.702
733.702 Limitations on presentation of claims.
(1) If not barred by s. 733.710, no claim or demand against the decedent’s estate that arose before the death of the decedent, including claims of the state and any of its political subdivisions, even if the claims are unmatured, contingent, or unliquidated; no claim for funeral or burial expenses; no claim for personal property in the possession of the personal representative; and no claim for damages, including, but not limited to, an action founded on fraud or another wrongful act or omission of the decedent, is binding on the estate, on the personal representative, or on any beneficiary unless filed in the probate proceeding on or before the later of the date that is 3 months after the time of the first publication of the notice to creditors or, as to any creditor required to be served with a copy of the notice to creditors, 30 days after the date of service on the creditor, even though the personal representative has recognized the claim or demand by paying a part of it or interest on it or otherwise. The personal representative may settle in full any claim without the necessity of the claim being filed when the settlement has been approved by the interested persons.
(2) No cause of action, including, but not limited to, an action founded upon fraud or other wrongful act or omission, shall survive the death of the person against whom the claim may be made, whether or not an action is pending at the death of the person, unless a claim is filed within the time periods set forth in this part.
(3) Any claim not timely filed as provided in this section is barred even though no objection to the claim is filed unless the court extends the time in which the claim may be filed. An extension may be granted only upon grounds of fraud, estoppel, or insufficient notice of the claims period. No independent action or declaratory action may be brought upon a claim which was not timely filed unless an extension has been granted by the court. If the personal representative or any other interested person serves on the creditor a notice to file a petition for an extension, the creditor shall be limited to a period of 30 days from the date of service of the notice in which to file a petition for extension.
(4) Nothing in this section affects or prevents:
(a) A proceeding to enforce any mortgage, security interest, or other lien on property of the decedent.
(b) To the limits of casualty insurance protection only, any proceeding to establish liability that is protected by the casualty insurance.
(c) The filing of a cross-claim or counterclaim against the estate in an action instituted by the estate; however, no recovery on a cross-claim or counterclaim shall exceed the estate’s recovery in that action.
(5) Nothing in this section shall extend the limitations period set forth in s. 733.710.
History.s. 1, ch. 74-106; s. 84, ch. 75-220; s. 2, ch. 80-127; s. 4, ch. 81-27; s. 160, ch. 83-216; s. 5, ch. 84-106; s. 4, ch. 85-79; s. 6, ch. 88-340; s. 5, ch. 89-340; s. 4, ch. 90-23; s. 1016, ch. 97-102; s. 146, ch. 2001-226; s. 6, ch. 2002-82; s. 26, ch. 2006-312; s. 21, ch. 2010-4.
Note.Created from former s. 733.16.

F.S. 733.702 on Google Scholar

F.S. 733.702 on Casetext

Amendments to 733.702


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 733.702
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 733.702.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

JOHNSON, v. TOWNSEND,, 259 So. 3d 851 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The notice, pursuant to section 733.702(1), stated in pertinent part: All creditors of the decedent and . . . See § 733.702(1), Fla. . . . On June 30, 2015, the three-month claims period under section 733.702(1) expired. . . . Section 733.702(4)(a) states: "Nothing in this section affects or prevents ... . . . See § 733.702(1), Fla. . . . wife filed more than two years after the decedent's death, for three reasons: (1) pursuant to section 733.702 . . .

LERMA- FUSCO a k a a k a v. SMITH,, 220 So. 3d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . See id.; § 733.702(3). . . .

IN RE ESTATE OF ARROYO, Jr. a a v. INFINITY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 211 So. 3d 240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 733.702(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . And the narrow exception provided by section 733.702(4)(b) is followed by section 733.702(5), reiterating . . . that nothing in section 733.702 “shall extend the limitations period set forth in s. 733.710.” . . . The narrow exception of section 733.702(4)(b) is inapplicable in this case because the estate’s liability . . . Applicable Case Law Regarding the exception for claims against an insured decedent, section 733.702(4 . . . she could no longer do so because the negligence lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations, § 733.702 . . . Although the Florida Supreme Court in May held that section 733.702 “is a statute of limitations that . . . However, unlike section 733.702, a creditor that has obtained a judgment in a separate action cannot . . . In Pezzi, the Fourth District held that the plaintiffs failure to comply with sections 733.702 and 733.710 . . . In support of its interpretation of sections 733.702 and 733.710, the court noted that the purpose of . . .

UNITED BANK, v. ESTATE OF G. FRAZEE,, 197 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 733.702(3), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . Thus, under section 733.702(1), the Bank’s deadline to file a claim was May 15, 2013. . . . meriting an extension “upon grounds of fraud, estoppel, or insufficient notice of the claims period.” § 733.702 . . .

J. RICHARD C. v. J. RICHARD,, 193 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Under section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (2015) “no claim or demand against the decedent’s estate that . . .

SORIANO, v. In ESTATE OF F. MANES,, 177 So. 3d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . . § 733.702(2). . . . . § 733.702(3).. . . . of the notice to creditors, her petition was untimely, and her asserted claim was barred by section 733.702 . . .

JONES, v. I. GOLDEN,, 176 So. 3d 242 (Fla. 2015)

. . . the notice to creditors but whose claim is known or reasonably ascertainable is barred under section 733.702 . . . never served with a copy of the notice to creditors, the statute of limitations set forth in section 733.702 . . . Because we conclude that the limitations periods prescribed in section 733.702(1) are not applicable . . . See § 733.702(1). . . . section applies only to claims that are untimely under section 733.702. . . .

SOUDER, v. MALONE,, 143 So. 3d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . court entered an order striking Souder’s claims, determining that they were untimely under section 733.702 . . . time-barred because they were filed beyond the three-month creditors’ claim period set forth in section 733.702 . . . Section 733.702(1) provides that: [N]o claim or demand against the decedent’s estate that arose before . . . period of 30 days from the date of service of the notice in which to file a petition for extension. § 733.702 . . . creditors must file claims against the estate with the court during the time periods set forth in s. 733.702 . . .

I. GOLDEN v. JONES,, 126 So. 3d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . never served with a copy of the notice to creditors, the statute of limitations set forth in section 733.702 . . . See §§ 733.702, 733.710, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . Section 733.702 is a statute of limitations that cannot be waived in a probate proceeding by failure . . . Our decision in Puzzo is consistent with the plain language of sections 733.702 and 733.710. . . . creditor to file a motion for extension of time under section 733.702(3). . . .

JOSEPH, v. In JOSEPH,, 83 So. 3d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . been extinguished, or at least reduced, by virtue of (a) the probate statutes of non-claim, sections 733.702 . . .

L. LUBEE, v. ADAMS, B. B., 77 So. 3d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . within three months of the date of first publication of the notice to creditors, pursuant to section 733.702 . . . Statutes (2006), or file a motion for extension of time in which to file his claim, pursuant to section 733.702 . . . Lubee was not served with a copy of the notice to creditors pursuant to sections 733.702(1) and 733.2121 . . . See § 733.702(1). . . . Lubee could seek an extension from the probate court pursuant to section 733.702(3) within the two-year . . .

R. KING, v. KING,, 67 So. 3d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

BOSTON INVESTORS GROUP, INC. v. SPATZ,, 43 So. 3d 149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . against the Estate of Carl Spatz arose prior to the death of the decedent for purposes of subsection 733.702 . . . As no grounds existed for an extension of time under subsection 733.702(3), the trial court properly . . .

BAILLARGEON, D v. SEWELL, 33 So. 3d 130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . was controlled by the former Florida Probate Law’s section 733.16, the predecessor to current section 733.702 . . . On the contrary, section 733.702(2) provides: No cause of action, including, but not limited to, an action . . .

F. GRAINGER, v. B. WALD, Jr., 29 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . denial of her petition to strike a claim filed against the estate by Wald as untimely under section 733.702 . . . The probate court denied the petition, finding the time constraints of section 733.702(1) inapplicable . . . There are two reasons why the probate court erred in finding the time constraints of section 733.702( . . . The time constraints contained in section 733.702(1) are important and should not be skirted by legal . . . Section 733.702(1) includes all claims within its scope, "even if the claims are unma-lured, contingent . . . See § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). See also Smoak v. Graham, 167 So.2d 559, 561 (Fla.1964). . . . deemed a “claim or demand against the decedent’s estate that arose before the death of the decedent.” § 733.702 . . .

R. MORGENTHAU, v. ESTATE OF M. ANDZEL, 26 So. 3d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Because appellant failed to file a request for extension pursuant to section 733.702, Florida Statutes . . . Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (2007), governs the filing of claims against an estate and provides . . . Upon reviewing the ... provisions of section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1983), we held that section 733.702 . . . In 1988, the Legislature amended section 733.702, Florida Statutes. . . . In 1989, the Legislature again amended section 733.702, Florida Statutes. . . .

MACK v. C. PERRI, M. D., 24 So. 3d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . We agree with the trial court that the Macks’ claims against the estate are barred by sections 733.702 . . . See § 733.702(1). . . . Further, the Macks did not file a request for an extension of time under section 733.702(3) until after . . . Here, the Macks’ claims were untimely filed under section 733.702(1). . . . Although section 733.702(3) provides for an extension, the claim and motion for an extension must be . . .

COPELAND, F. v. R. BUSWELL, 20 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Tampa General filed a lien in the probate case, pursuant to section 733.702, to preserve its rights against . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 986 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 733.702, Fla. Stat. Limitations on presentation of claims. § 733.705, Fla. Stat. . . .

B. WHEELER, v. POWERS,, 972 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . expenses of the administration and obligations of a decedent’s estate, or any claims described in s. 733.702 . . .

In ESTATE OF J. KOSHUBA, J. v. A. J., 993 So. 2d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . authorized to sell because “no cause of action was timely filed by the purchaser in accordance with F.S. 733.702 . . . (1), F.S. 733.702(6) and F.S. 733.710.” . . . Zilewicz was timely filed in accordance with sections 733.702 and 733.710, Florida Statutes (2003). . . . In May, 771 So.2d at 1150, the court held that section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1991), is a statute . . . The amendment is pertinent to the instant case and renders the claim timely under section 733.702. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 964 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 2007)

. . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . .

F. HAYES, Jr. v. GUARDIANSHIP OF E. THOMPSON,, 952 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 2006)

. . . expenses of the administration and obligations of the decedent’s estate, or any claims described in s. 733.702 . . .

BUSH Jo v. WEBB, In Re Jo, 939 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . in this section. (2) This section shall not apply to a creditor who has filed a claim pursuant to s. 733.702 . . .

FAERBER, A. Jr. A. Jr. v. D. G., 928 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . As such, the trial court granted D.G.’s petition pursuant to section 733.702(3), specifically finding . . . Section 733.702(3), Florida Statutes (2004), states in part, "An extension may be granted only upon grounds . . .

R. SIMPSON L. v. ESTATE OF H. SIMPSON, Jr., 922 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 733.702(3), Fla. Stat. . . . 783.702(1) only if the claimant has been granted an extension of time to file the claim pursuant to s. 733.702 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES TWO YEAR CYCLE, 912 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 733.702, Fla. Stat. Limitations on presentation of claims. § 733.705, Fla. Stat. . . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . . Notice to creditors; filing of claims. § 733.702, Fla. Stat. . . .

INTERIM HEALTHCARE OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. v. ESTATE OF M. RIES,, 910 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 733.702(1), (3), Fla. . . .

SCOTT, v. REYES,, 913 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . of claim in the probate proceeding for the decedent’s estate within the time allowed under section 733.702 . . . Scott had failed to file a creditor’s claim as required by section 733.702(1), and that any claim she . . . well as to claims for personal property in the possession of the personal representative. § 733.702( . . . The bar imposed by section 733.702 is a statute of limitations, not a statute of non-claim. May v. . . . See § 733.702(4). Other claims are excluded from the operation of the statute by case law. . . .

LONGMIRE, v. ESTATE OF RUFFIN,, 909 So. 2d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Additionally, section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes, limits the time a creditor can successfully present . . . required to be served with a copy of the notice to creditors, thirty days after the date of service. § 733.702 . . .

COBA, v. CRAIG, As R., 881 So. 2d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Therefore, Robert preserved any claim on the property by properly asserting same within the time frame in 733.702 . . .

CASTRO, Sr. L. v. EAST PASS ENTERPRISES, INC., 881 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 733.702(1) & (3), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . Waiver is not a permissible ground for extension of time under section 733.702(3). . . .

DELGADO, v. ESTATE OF GARRIGA,, 870 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . .

LENT, v. ESTATE OF G. LENT,, 875 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 733.702, Florida Statutes (2001); Spohr v. Berryman, 589 So.2d 225 (Fla.1991). . . .

BECKLUND, v. M. FLEMING, J., 869 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 733.702. . . . serving at the time of or as a result of the settlor’s death within the time periods set forth in s. 733.702 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 848 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 733.702, Fla. Stat. Limitations on presentation of claims. § 733.705, Fla. Stat. . . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . . Notice to creditors; filing of claims. § 733.702, Fla. Stat. . . . Notice to creditors; filing of claims. § 733.702, Fla. Stat. . . .

B. STRULOWITZ, v. CADLE COMPANY, II, INC., 839 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . A creditor who fails to file its claim within the applicable period set forth in section 733.702(1), . . . Section 733.702(3), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the extension may be granted only upon the . . . Section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides in pertinent part: [N]o claim or demand against . . .

RYAN, IV, E. v. LOBO DE GONZALEZ, 841 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . defense that would excuse a claim that was untimely under the statute of limitations contained at section 733.702 . . .

MILLER, v. ESTATE OF BAER, FSB,, 837 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Pursuant to section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (1995), creditors had three months after the time of . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, v. S. A. P., 835 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Estate of Read, 493 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla.1986) ("[J]ustice requires us to hold that section 733.702 is . . .

C. THOMPSON, C. v. K. HODSON, M. D. K. M. D. P. A. K. M. D. v. C. C. K. M. D. v., 825 So. 2d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . the probate case, Thompson argues that Hodson’s claim against the estate was time-barred by sections 733.702 . . . This motion argued that Hodson’s claim against the estate was time-barred by sections 733.702 and 733.710 . . . that Hodson’s statement of claim concerning fees and costs was not timely filed according to sections 733.702 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 824 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 2002)

. . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . . Trust companies and other corporations and associations. § 733.702,-Fla — Stat. . . . Notice to creditors; filing of claims. § 733.702, Fla. Stat. . . .

F. LANGFORD, Jr. v. FERRERA, E. v. E. v., 823 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . payments, taxes, insurance, maintenance, and repairs and are not subject to the provisions of sections 733.702 . . . Compton, 662 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); §§ 733.702 and 733.710, Fla. Stat. . . .

In ESTATE OF M. ELLIOTT, M. v., 798 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 733.702(1), 733.705(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, v. L. MORSANI,, 790 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2001)

. . . Estate of Read, 493 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla.1986) ("[J]ustice requires us to hold that section 733.702 is . . .

R. MAY, Ad T. v. ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 245 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2001)

. . . The question is as follows: WHETHER SECTION 733.702 AND SECTION 733.710 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES CONSIDERED . . . In its response, the Florida Supreme Court held that: (1) section 733.702(3), Florida Statutes (1991) . . . period set forth in section 733.710,” but “did not satisfy the limitation period set forth in section 733.702 . . . Supreme Court’s opinion “raises the possibility that Prockup can demonstrate compliance with section 733.702 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STEVENSON, J. J., 159 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Defendants seek summary judgment based on Florida Statutes, § 733.702, which Defendants argue bars the . . . The Government asserts that as the sovereign it is not subject to the limitations period set out in § 733.702 . . . Section 733.702 bars any claims made outside the time frame. . . . Defendants argue that § 733.702 bars the Government’s claim for unpaid taxes because the Government did . . . The Government does not argue that it made its claim within the three month time frame set out in § 733.702 . . .

E. HARRISON, v. In ESTATE OF SWEENEY, Jr., 777 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Although the amended claim was filed outside the three month statutory filing period, see § 733.702, . . .

L. FOSTER, III, K. v. CIANCI,, 773 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 733.702(3), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

R. MAY, Ad T. v. ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000)

. . . SECTION 733.702 Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1991), sets forth in pertinent part: (1)If not barred . . . section 733.702 “is a statute of limitations.” . . . See § 733.702(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . See § 733.702(4)(b), Fla. . . . See § 733.702(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1991); Pezzi v. . . .

In ESTATE OF ORTOLANO, v. O. O. Co-, 766 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . . § 733.702(3); American & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Dimson, 645 So.2d 45, 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). . . .

R. MAY, Ad T. v. ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 190 F.3d 1200 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . See §§ 733.702, 733.703, 733.710, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . See § 733.702(4)(b), Fla Stat. (1991); Pezzi v. . . . May’s first two arguments are foreclosed, at least as to section 733.702. . . . See § 733.702(3), Fla. Stat.(1991). . . . The home argued that section 733.702 was a statute of limitations, so that any claim filed beyond the . . .

AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, v. In ESTATE OF JOHNSON a k a, 743 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . of its lien against the estate of Kevin Johnson a/k/a Robert Watson (“estate”) pursuant to section 733.702 . . . estate, we conclude that it was nevertheless a timely creditor’s claim also for purposes of section 733.702 . . . Specifically, this statute provides in relevant part that: 733.702 Limitations on presentation of claims . . . AHCA argues that the trial court erred because section 733.702 is a statute of limitations and thus, . . . Ill AHCA maintains that section 733.702 is a statute of limitations and thus, an affirmative defense . . . Secondly, it is true that section 733.702 does not direct a creditor to the proper court in which to . . . This is because section 733.702(5) expressly prohibits any court from granting an extension of the time . . . Section 733.702 contains other provisions which, if complied with, reduce the time period for the filing . . . In a word, that is because sections 733.702(4)(a) and 733.710(3) exclude a “security interest, or other . . .

ESTATE OF SHEARER, By SHEARER, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,, 737 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . that Notice of Administration is published this date, triggering the 3-month claims period under § 733.702 . . . her estate to timely file a claim against the estate to recoup the monies expended on her behalf. § 733.702 . . . grants an extension upon the grounds of fraud, estoppel or insufficient notice of the claims period. § 733.702 . . . Subsection 733.702(1) provides in pertinent part: (1) If not barred by s. 733.710, no claim or demand . . .

M. R. R. R. v. A. B. C. J. M. A. B. C., 739 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . opposed the motion arguing that M.R. was required to file a claim in the probate division under section 733.702 . . . In addition, the trial court ruled that if M.R. did comply with section 733.702 and her claim was rejected . . . Section 733.702 stales that no claim "is binding on the estate, on the personal representative, or on . . . Id. § 733.702(1). .After the court's denial of substitution, M.R. filed a claim in the probate division . . .

U. S. BORAX, INC. v. FORSTER, As F. Sr., 764 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Stat. section 733.702 (1995). U.S. Borax, Inc. . . . on May 15, 1997, along with a petition for extension of time to file its claim pursuant to sections 733.702 . . . is preempted by CERCLA’s three-year statute of limitations, and that barring its claim under section 733.702 . . . The court ruled that CERC-LA does not preempt section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1995). . . . interference with administration of the Estate did not constitute grounds for an extension under section 733.702 . . .

M. BROWN, v. T. BROWN, n k a T., 732 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . However, this distinction has no import in the present context under section 733.702(4)(d), Florida Statutes . . . recovery, up to the amount of the estate’s recovery in the action below, is permitted under section 733.702 . . .

NESSMITH v. ARNOLD Co. Pa., 723 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See section 733.702(2), Florida Statutes (1995). BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur. . . .

HOGAN, v. HOWARD,, 716 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that a claim or demand against an estate that arose . . .

D. PRESCOTT, v. F. STANLEY,, 710 So. 2d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . dismissal was: The court finds that the Plaintiffs failure to timely comply with the claim provision of § 733.702 . . .

BANK, NATURE COAST, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF NICHOLS,, 701 So. 2d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . proceeding affecting the expenses of the administration of the estate, or any claims described in Sec. 733.702 . . .

L. BUETTNER, v. CELLULAR ONE, INC. a n k a Of a Of a, 700 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . his negligence claim against Homer based on the two-year statute of limitations provided in sections 733.702 . . .

PEZZI v. BROWN, Jr. Co. a, 697 So. 2d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The final summary judgment was based on plaintiffs’ failure to comply with sections 733.702 and 733.710 . . . Sections 733.702 and 733.710 are part of Chapter 733, Florida’s probate code. . . . Section 733.702 operates as a statute of limitations for claims made against an estate. . . . Subsection 733.702(1) requires all claims against an estate to be filed within three months after the . . . Subsection 733.702(2) provides that no cause of action “shall survive the death of the person against . . .

In ESTATE OF V. RAIS, K. KIVISTO, V. v. NATIONSCREDIT CORPORATION f k a C S, 691 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . obligation under the sales agreement was a claim barred by the limitation periods set forth in sections 733.702 . . . The first three addressed the effect of sections 733.702 and 733.710, Florida Statutes. . . .

U. S. TRUST COMPANY OF FLORIDA SAVINGS BANK, J. v. M. HAIG, Jr., 694 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 733.702(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . . § 733.702(3); American & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Dimson, 645 So.2d 45 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). . . . Florida Statute § 733.702(3) states that: Any claim not timely filed as provided in this section is barred . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 683 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1996)

. . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . . Trust companies and other corporations and associations. § 733.702, Fla.Stat. . . .

COMERICA BANK TRUST, F. S. B. v. SDI OPERATING PARTNERS, L. P. a, 673 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Also found in part VII is section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1991). . . . The introductory adverbial phrase in section 733.702(1), “[i]f not barred by s. 733.710,” means that . . . the 2-year period of section 733.710 is paramount over the limitations period in section 733.702(1). . . . We also take note of section 733.702(3), which states that: “[a]ny claim not timely filed as provided . . . It was not always true about section 733.702 that it was merely an ordinary limitations period. . . .

SWENSZKOWSKI, v. COMPTON,, 662 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See §§ 733.702 & .710(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

M. PAYNE, A. S. J. M. M. v. B. STALLEY, M., 672 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . of limitations or otherwise argued to the federal court that the claim did not survive under section 733.702 . . . It was not accompanied by a motion to extend time under section 733.702(3), Florida Statutes (1989). . . . rehearing, which was also a motion for extension of time to file the 1993 claim pursuant to section 733.702 . . . Nevertheless, the Paynes are seeking an extension not only beyond the period authorized in section 733.702 . . . Section 733.702(3) permits an extension only upon grounds of fraud, estoppel, or insufficient notice . . .

C. OHL E. P. v. F. J. MOLONEY,, 658 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . The requirements of section 733.702(3) have not been satisfied. . . . See § 733.702(3), Fla.Stat. (1993); Rinker Materials Corp. v. Palmer First Nat'l. . . .

BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC. v. C. CARTER, 658 So. 2d 560 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . in this section. (2) This section shall not apply to a creditor who has filed a claim pursuant to s. 733.702 . . . The point is demonstrated by the cases construing section 733.702, the analogous statute concerning the . . . creditor would lose the right to assert these potentially valid claims were we to hold that section 733.702 . . .

AMERICAN FOREIGN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DIMSON,, 645 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Under section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (1993), no claim or demand against a decedent’s estate is . . . Under section 733.702(3), Florida Statutes (1993), the only grounds constituting exceptions to late filing . . .

In ESTATE OF L. DANESE,, 641 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 108 S.Ct. 1340, 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988), held that section 733.702, Florida Statutes . . . the probate court erred (1) in misconstruing this court’s holding in Thames by finding that section 733.702 . . . Jackson, 598 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), held that section 733.702 was unconstitutional. . . . 733.702 was unconstitutional and could not operate as a bar to appellees’ claim. . . . Appellants argue that the probate court misconstrued the holding of Thames, since section 733.702 is . . .

DENTON, v. B. GETSON, B. P. A. a a, 637 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . failed to file a claim against the estate of the payor of the note within the time permitted by section 733.702 . . . Section 733.702(4) excludes proceedings to enforce hens and mortgages from the operation of the non-claims . . .

In ESTATE OF PUZZO, PUZZO v. In ESTATE OF PUZZO,, 637 So. 2d 26 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . However, regardless of whether or not the claimants had actual notice, section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes . . .

WINEGAR, v. ESTATE OF CISEK,, 632 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Because Cisek died in May of 1987, sections 733.702(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1985), are the applicable . . . Section 733.702(l)(a) states that no claim against an estate, which arose prior to the decedent’s death . . . then all claims not presented within three years after the decedent’s death are barred under section 733.702 . . . Furthermore, section 733.702(2), Florida Statutes (1985), provides: No cause of action heretofore or . . .

In ESTATE OF GLEASON a k a E. RAINE, v. GLEASON, a k a, 631 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (1987), which was applicable at the time, required claims against . . .

WYLIE v. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH INC. A., 629 So. 2d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 733.702, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . Until 1986, section 733.702 was considered a statute of limitations; in that year, however, the legislature . . .

G. GARTLEY, v. B. GARTLEY,, 622 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . court entered summary judgment finding that Dorothy’s claims were barred by the provisions of section 733.702 . . .

MONEYHUN, v. VITAL INDUSTRIES, INC. a a, 611 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . additionally claim that any action for damages against Donoyan’s individual estate is barred by Section 733.702 . . . However, section 733.702(l)(b) authorizes the maintenance of such actions if filed within three years . . .

BURGIS, v. J. BURGIS, L. a k a P., 611 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Committee Notes, “The right to petition for an extension of time to file a claim is set forth in section 733.702 . . . claim may be filed “upon grounds of fraud, estoppel, or insufficient notice of the claims period.” § 733.702 . . .

A. JONES, v. SUN BANK MIAMI, N. A. F. Co- E., 609 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Sec. 733.702 F.S. provides that a claim against a decedent is barred unless a statement of claim is filed . . . Court has the authority to extend the time for filing claims past the bar date in accordance with Sec. 733.702 . . . limitations, section 95.11, Fla.Stat., which is further limited by the specific provisions of section 733.702 . . . 95.11(3)(i) and (j), [the action] is barred by her failure to file a claim ... as required by section 733.702 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 607 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Notifying creditors. ⅜§⅛ 733.702, Fla.Stat. Limitations on presentation of claims. . . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . . Trust companies and other corporations and associations. § 733.702, Fla.Stat. . . . Notice of ad-objections and 733.702, Fla.Stat. presentation of claims. . . .

LAKE LUCERNE CIVIC ASS N, INC. v. DOLPHIN STADIUM CORP. a, 801 F. Supp. 684 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . basis that the Plaintiffs have failed to timely file a claim against the Estate under Florida Statute § 733.702 . . . parties has not yet started to run; and (2) that Plaintiffs’ claims are not barred under Fla.Stat. § 733.702 . . . Fla.Stat. § 733.702 (West 1991) provides that no claims against the decedent’s estate that arose before . . .

In ESTATE OF L. DANESE,, 601 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . publication of the first notice of administration, was sufficient to satisfy the provisions of section 733.702 . . . the filing of a civil lawsuit within the nonclaim period does not constitute compliance with section 733.702 . . .

S. THAMES, v. P. JACKSON, E. Jr., 598 So. 2d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . At issue in this appeal is the continued viability of section 733.702(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), . . . Section 733.702(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that no claim against an estate, which arose . . . Our holding that section 733.702 is a statute of limitations confirms the fact that estates and creditors . . . As noted above, section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1985), provided that no claim against an estate would . . . Fraud and estoppel were made exceptions to the time requirement found in section 733.702 by Chaper 88 . . .

ESTATE OF VERNON, v. SHEARSON, LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC., 587 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Vernon’s estate within the time parameters set out in section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1989), and when . . . In the case at bar the trial court should have applied the bar from section 733.702, Florida Statutes . . . The case is remanded and the trial judge is instructed to apply the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . .

HCA NEW PORT RICHEY HOSPITAL, v. ESTATE OF M. BOSCHELLI,, 588 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . the time of decedent’s death in 1985, until 1988, when it was amended, the claims statute, section 733.702 . . . The trial judge also was apparently under the impression that section 733.702(3), Florida Statutes (1989 . . .

ESTATE OF McKINNEY, v. M. SOFKA,, 585 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . that the claim, which arose during the administration of the estate, is time barred by either section 733.702 . . . Section 733.702, in its terms, applies to claims that arose before the death of the decedent and does . . .

W. SPOHR, v. C. BERRYMAN,, 589 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1991)

. . . Under section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1985), this meant that claims against the estate had to be filed . . . The court reasoned that section 733.702 was only applicable to claims which arose before the death of . . . Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1985), reads in pertinent part: (1) No claim or demand against the . . . The non-claim statute, section 733.702, includes claims “whether due or not, direct or contingent, or . . . See F.S. 733.702(2). . . . I agree with the majority that the purpose of sections 733.212 and 733.702, Florida Statutes (1985), . . . The pertinent provisions of section 733.-702, Florida Statutes (1985), read as follows: 733.702 Limitations . . . court that has jurisdiction of the probate proceeding, within the statutory period permitted by section 733.702 . . . , satisfies the filing requirements of sections 733.212 and 733.702. . . . , Florida Statutes (1985), was in accordance with the provisions of section 733.702, Florida Statutes . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 584 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1991)

. . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of section 733.702, Florida . . . Revision: Subdivision (a) modified to make it consistent with recent changes to sections 733.212 and 733.702 . . . Trust companies and other corporations and associations. § 733.702, Fla.Stat. . . . 1991 Revision: The right to petition for an extension of time to file a claim is set forth in section 733.702 . . .

In HILL, M. HILL, v. HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a HCA, 582 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . There, the court addressed an Oklahoma probate statute which, similar to section 733.702, Florida Statutes . . . for the filing of claims by estate creditors who have missed the filing deadline imposed by section 733.702 . . . The section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1987), three-month period within which estate creditors could . . . by moving to strike the claim, because it had not been filed within the time prescribed by section 733.702 . . . contemplated that substantially more creditors who have missed the filing deadline imposed by F.S. 733.702 . . . Section 733.702, Florida Statutes, is thus invalid as a basis for terminating the claim of a known creditor . . . However, no opinion is offered whether such claims are barred by the provisions of F.S. 733.702. . . . On the date the amended rule became effective, the time for filing under Section 733.702, Florida Statutes . . .

S. CARLTON C. v. B. CARLTON R. Co- T. Jr., 575 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (1988) specifically provides that no claim or demand against a decedent . . . Section 733.702(3) provides that any claim not timely filed as required by section 733.702 is forever . . .

MARKHAM, v. W. MORIARTY,, 575 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . which states that all claims against the estate must be filed “within the time periods set forth in ss. 733.702 . . .

In ESTATE OF PARSON. JAMES N. DAVIS FUNERAL HOME, INC. v. McCLENDON,, 570 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . months from the date of the first publication of the notice of administration, as required by Section 733.702 . . . Thus, any claim filed beyond the time set forth in section 733.702 is barred only if the statute of limitations . . . We note, however, that the 1988 amendment added one significant change to section 733.702. . . . See also the 1988 amendments to chapter 733, particularly section 733.702(3), discussed supra at n. 1 . . .

CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM TAFT, v. N. MILLER,, 569 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .-11(3)(f), 733.702, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

MARTINEZ, v. KENNEDY REAL ESTATE OF LABELLE, INC. PENSION TRUST,, 565 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . See § 733.702(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). . . .

M. SPOHR, E. Jr. A. v. C. BERRYMAN, E. W., 564 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 733.702, Fla. Stat. (1987). . . . The trial court, in a two-step process, concluded section 733.702 was applicable and the filing of the . . . Section 733.702 (1987) requires that claimants, whose claims arose before the death of the decedent, . . . involving contracts entered into prior to death, were barred by section 733.16, the predecessor of section 733.702 . . .

In ESTATE OF V. VICKERY,, 564 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . The period for filing claims in the estate under Florida Statutes § 733.702, expired on November 11, . . . were not timely filed and were, therefore, barred pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes § 733.702 . . . months from the date of the first publication of the notice of administration to present a claim. § 733.702 . . .

In ESTATE OF H. BARNETT,, 549 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 733.702(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1987) reads in relevant part: (1) No claim or demand against . . . Pope places the constitutionality of section 733.702 in doubt. . . .