The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLIII
DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Chapter 744
GUARDIANSHIP

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 744.464

744.464 Restoration to capacity.—

(1) VENUE.—A suggestion of capacity must be filed with the court in which the guardianship is pending.

(2) SUGGESTION OF CAPACITY.—

(a) Any interested person, including the ward, may file a suggestion of capacity. The suggestion of capacity must state that the ward is currently capable of exercising some or all of the rights which were removed.

(b) Upon the filing of the suggestion of capacity, the court shall immediately appoint a physician to examine the ward. The physician must examine the ward and file his or her report with the court within 20 days after the appointment.

(c) The court shall immediately send notice of the filing of the suggestion of capacity to the ward, the guardian, the attorney for the ward, if any, and any other interested persons designated by the court. Formal notice must be served on the guardian. Informal notice may be served on other persons. Notice need not be served on the person who filed the suggestion of capacity.

(d) Any objections to the suggestion of capacity must be filed within 20 days after service of the notice.

(e) If an objection is timely filed, or if the medical examination suggests that full restoration is not appropriate, the court shall set the matter for hearing. If the ward does not have an attorney, the court shall appoint one to represent the ward.

(f) Notice of the hearing and copies of the objections and medical examination reports shall be served upon the ward, the ward’s attorney, the guardian, the ward’s next of kin, and any other interested persons as directed by the court.

(3) ORDER OF RESTORATION.—

(a) If no objections are filed, and the court is satisfied that the medical examination establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that restoration of all or some of the ward’s rights is appropriate, the court shall enter an order of restoration of capacity, restoring all or some of the rights which were removed from the ward in accordance with those findings.

(b) At the conclusion of a hearing, conducted pursuant to s. 744.1095, the court shall make specific findings of fact and, based on a preponderance of the evidence, enter an order either denying the suggestion of capacity or restoring all or some of the rights which were removed from the ward. The ward has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the restoration of capacity is warranted.

(c) If only some rights are restored to the ward, the order must state which rights are restored, and the guardian shall prepare a new guardianship report which addresses only the remaining rights retained by the guardian. The guardian must file a copy of the new report with the court within 60 days after the entry of the order.

(4) TIMELINESS OF HEARING.—The court shall give priority to any suggestion of capacity and shall advance the cause on the calendar.

History.—ss. 10, 26, ch. 75-222; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 81, ch. 89-96; s. 57, ch. 90-271; s. 1104, ch. 97-102; s. 22, ch. 2006-178; s. 19, ch. 2015-83.

F.S. 744.464 on Google Scholar

F.S. 744.464 on Casetext

Amendments to 744.464

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 744.464

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 744.464.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WALLACE, v. COMPREHENSIVE PERSONAL CARE SERVICES, INC., 275 So. 3d 782 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Such a proceeding is governed by a separate section of the Florida Guardianship Law, section 744.464, . . . In fact, section 744.464(2) neither incorporates section 744.341's examination requirements, nor contains . . .

LINDE, v. In M. LINDE,, 199 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . appointed an independent physician to examine Ward and report on Ward’s capacity pursuant to section 744.464 . . . In fact, section 744.464(2) neither incorporates section 744.331’s examination requirements, nor contains . . . Temporary Guardian asserts that we should graft requirements onto section 744.464(2) that the Legislature . . . We decline Temporary Guardian’s invitation to add provisions to section 744.464(2) that simply are not . . . As section 744.464 makes clear, the purpose of the suggestion of capacity eviden-tiary hearing is for . . .

C. VICK, v. G. BAILEY B., 777 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Vick claimed to be an interested person in the proceedings under section 744.464, Florida Statutes (1999 . . . Section 744.464(2)(a) provides, in part, that “[a]n interested person, including the Ward, may file a . . . Ward and any “interested person,” which Vick asserts that he is, may file a suggestion of capacity. § 744.464 . . .

GARNER, v. GARNER,, 733 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . suggestion of capacity where the trial court properly followed the procedure as set forth in section 744.464 . . .

MORGAN, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF TURGEON,, 724 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . proceeded to appoint one physician to examine the ward within twenty days, by analogy with section 744.464 . . .

WHITLEY, v. CRAIG,, 710 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 744.464, Fla. Stat. (1997). AFFIRMED. DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . . .

In GUARDIANSHIP OF B. BOCKMULLER SALMON A. v. HARRIS, BARRETT, MANN DEW, P. A., 602 So. 2d 608 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See §§ 744.3215(3)(a), 744.464(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

G. CONNELL, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF C. CONNELL,, 476 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . In fact, Section 744.464, Florida Statutes (1983), governing restoration of competency, provides at subsection . . .