Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 751.05 (2025)
Order granting temporary or concurrent custody.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
751.05 Order granting temporary or concurrent custody.—
(1) At the hearing on the petition for temporary or concurrent custody, the court must hear the evidence concerning a minor child’s need for care by the petitioner, all other matters required to be set forth in the petition, and the objections or other testimony of the child’s parents, if present.
(2) Unless the minor child’s parents object, the court shall award temporary or concurrent custody of the child to the petitioner if it is in the best interest of the child.
(3) If one of the minor child’s parents objects to:
(a) The petition for concurrent custody, in writing, the court may not grant the petition even if the other parent consents, in writing, to the entry of the order. The court shall give the petitioner the option of converting the petition to a petition for temporary custody. If the petitioner so elects, the court shall set the matter for further hearing, provide notice to the parent or parents, and proceed pursuant to paragraph (b). If the petition is not converted into a petition for temporary custody, it shall be dismissed without prejudice.
(b) The petition for temporary custody, the court shall grant the petition only upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the child’s parent or parents are unfit to provide for the care and control of the child. In determining that a parent is unfit, the court must find that the parent has abused, abandoned, or neglected the child, as defined in chapter 39.
(4) The order granting:
(a) Concurrent custody of the minor child may not eliminate or diminish the custodial rights of the child’s parent or parents. The order must expressly state that the grant of custody does not affect the ability of the child’s parent or parents to obtain physical custody of the child at any time, except that the court may approve provisions requested in the petition which are related to the best interest of the child, including a reasonable transition plan that provides for a return of custody back to the child’s parent or parents.
(b) Temporary custody of the minor child to the petitioner may include provisions requested in the petition which are related to the best interest of the child, including a reasonable transition plan that provides for a return of custody back to the parent or parents, and may also grant visitation rights to the child’s parent or parents, if it is in the best interest of the child.
(5) The order granting temporary or concurrent custody of the minor child to the petitioner:
(a) May not include an order for the support of the child unless the parent has received personal or substituted service of process, the petition requests an order for the support of the child, and there is evidence of the parent’s ability to pay the support ordered.
(b) May redirect all or part of an existing child support obligation to be paid to the extended family member who is granted temporary or concurrent custody of the child. If the court redirects an existing child support obligation, the order granting temporary or concurrent custody must include, if possible, the determination of arrearages owed to the obligee and the person awarded temporary or concurrent custody and must order payment of the arrearages. The clerk of the circuit court in which the order is entered shall transmit a certified copy to the court originally entering the child support order. The temporary or concurrent custody order shall be recorded and filed in the original action in which child support was determined and become a part thereof. A copy of the temporary or concurrent custody order shall also be filed with the depository that serves as the official recordkeeper for support payments due under the support order. The depository must maintain separate accounts and separate account numbers for individual obligees.
(6) At any time, either or both of the child’s parents may petition the court to modify or terminate the order granting temporary custody.
(a) The court may modify an order granting temporary custody if the parties consent or if modification is in the best interest of the child.
(b) The court shall terminate the order upon a finding that the parent is a fit parent, or by consent of the parties, except that the court may require the parties to comply with provisions approved in the order which are related to a reasonable plan for transitioning custody before terminating the order.
(c) If the order granting temporary custody was entered after a finding that the child’s parent or parents are unfit and the child has been in the temporary custody of an extended family member for a period of time the court determines to be significant, the court may, on its own motion, establish reasonable conditions, which are in the best interests of the child, for transitioning the child back to the custody of the child’s parent or parents. In determining such reasonable conditions, the court shall consider all of the following:
1. The length of time the child lived or resided with the extended family member.
2. The child’s developmental stage.
3. The length of time reasonably needed to complete the transition.
(7) At any time, the petitioner or either or both of the child’s parents may move the court to terminate the order granting concurrent custody.
(a) The court shall terminate the order upon a finding that either or both of the child’s parents object to the order, except that the court may require the parties to comply with provisions approved in the order which are related to a reasonable plan for transitioning custody before terminating the order.
(b) The fact that an order for concurrent custody has been terminated does not preclude any person who is otherwise eligible to petition for temporary custody from filing such petition.
(8) At any time, the petitioner or either or both of the child’s parents may move the court to modify the existing child support order pursuant to chapter 61. The court may modify an existing order granting child support if the parties consent and if modification is in the best interest of the child. Any order modifying child support in a concurrent custody proceeding shall be copied and placed in the related family court files.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: D.H. v. Adept Cmty. Servs., Inc., 271 So. 3d 870 (Fla. 2018).
D.H. v. Adept Cmty. Servs., Inc., 271 So. 3d 870 (Fla. 2018). “See generally § 751.05, Fla. Stat. (2006). 8. The version of the statute in effect today contains identical language.”
Quevedo-Woolf v. Overholser, 820 S.E.2d 817 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018). “Fla. Stat. § 751.05 (2007). The Act also provides a simple method for parents to regain full custody of their children-filing the appropriate petition to terminate the custody order and demonstrating to the court that they are "a fit parent," or demonstrating that all parties to…”
Hammond v. Howard, 828 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). “§ 751.05(7), Fla. Stat. (2001). Because an erroneous legal standard was applied below, this cause is remanded for reconsideration under the proper standard.”
A.N. v. M.f.-a., 946 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). “, appeal from a final judgment dismissing their emergency petition for temporary custody of a minor child pursuant to section 751.05(3), Florida Statutes (2005).”
Mendez v. Mendez Lopez, 271 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). “” § 751.05(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). It further provides that “[u]nless the minor child’s parents object, the court shall award temporary or concurrent custody of the child to the petitioner if it is in the best interest of the child.”
Seilkop v. Barker, 148 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). “” The term “fit parent” is not defined, but another provision of section 751.05 explains that a parent is “unfit” if the parent has “abused, abandoned, or neglected the child, as defined in chapter 39.”
Tata v. Tata, 207 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). “540(b)(4) motion. Eighth, the maternal grandmother argues the father waived the right to seek relief from the order by seeking other relief from the court after the 2008 custody order.”
Landinguin v. Carneal, 837 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “” While section 751.05(1) provides for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of temporary custody, here the grandparents have failed to allege sufficient facts to justify temporary custody over the parents’ objection.”
Glockson v. Manna, 711 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). “Section 751.05(3) specifies that an award of temporary custody to an extended family member over the objection of a natural parent may be granted only upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parent is unfit, in which case the trial court must make a finding…”
D.B. v. W.J.P., 962 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). “Further, section 751.05 states in pertinent part: (1) At the hearing on the petition for temporary custody, the court must hear the evidence concerning a minor child’s need for care by the petitioner, all other matters required to be set forth in the petition, and the objections…”
Dubois v. Leon, 12 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). “See § 751.05(3), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“If one of the minor child’s parents objects to the granting of temporary custody to the petitioner, the court shall grant the petition only upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the child’s parent or parents are unfit to…”
Ashley Williams v. Charles Harrison Burgess, 164 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). “See § 751.05(6), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“At any time, either or both of the child’s parents may petition the court to modify or terminate the order granting temporary custody.”
— 751.05(1) — 3 cases
Mendez v. Mendez Lopez, 271 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). “” § 751.05(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). It further provides that “[u]nless the minor child’s parents object, the court shall award temporary or concurrent custody of the child to the petitioner if it is in the best interest of the child.”
Landinguin v. Carneal, 837 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “” While section 751.05(1) provides for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of temporary custody, here the grandparents have failed to allege sufficient facts to justify temporary custody over the parents’ objection.”
K.S. v. E.S., 161 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).
— 751.05(2) — 1 case
Mendez v. Mendez Lopez, 271 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). “” § 751.05(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). It further provides that “[u]nless the minor child’s parents object, the court shall award temporary or concurrent custody of the child to the petitioner if it is in the best interest of the child.”
— 751.05(3) — 12 cases
D.H. v. Adept Cmty. Servs., Inc., 271 So. 3d 870 (Fla. 2018). “See generally § 751.05, Fla. Stat. (2006). 8. The version of the statute in effect today contains identical language.”
A.N. v. M.f.-a., 946 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). “, appeal from a final judgment dismissing their emergency petition for temporary custody of a minor child pursuant to section 751.05(3), Florida Statutes (2005).”
Landinguin v. Carneal, 837 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). “” While section 751.05(1) provides for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of temporary custody, here the grandparents have failed to allege sufficient facts to justify temporary custody over the parents’ objection.”
Glockson v. Manna, 711 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). “Section 751.05(3) specifies that an award of temporary custody to an extended family member over the objection of a natural parent may be granted only upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parent is unfit, in which case the trial court must make a finding…”
Dubois v. Leon, 12 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). “See § 751.05(3), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“If one of the minor child’s parents objects to the granting of temporary custody to the petitioner, the court shall grant the petition only upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the child’s parent or parents are unfit to…”
— 751.05(3)(a) — 1 case
Mendez v. Mendez Lopez, 271 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). “” § 751.05(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). It further provides that “[u]nless the minor child’s parents object, the court shall award temporary or concurrent custody of the child to the petitioner if it is in the best interest of the child.”
— 751.05(3)(b) — 2 cases
Seilkop v. Barker, 148 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). “” The term “fit parent” is not defined, but another provision of section 751.05 explains that a parent is “unfit” if the parent has “abused, abandoned, or neglected the child, as defined in chapter 39.”
Christopher Morris v. Sean Morris, 255 So. 3d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).
— 751.05(4) — 2 cases
D.M.M. v. J.M.M., 63 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
In Re Amm, 63 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
— 751.05(6) — 3 cases
Tata v. Tata, 207 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). “540(b)(4) motion. Eighth, the maternal grandmother argues the father waived the right to seek relief from the order by seeking other relief from the court after the 2008 custody order.”
Seilkop v. Barker, 148 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). “” The term “fit parent” is not defined, but another provision of section 751.05 explains that a parent is “unfit” if the parent has “abused, abandoned, or neglected the child, as defined in chapter 39.”
Ashley Williams v. Charles Harrison Burgess, 164 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). “See § 751.05(6), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“At any time, either or both of the child’s parents may petition the court to modify or terminate the order granting temporary custody.”
— 751.05(7) — 7 cases
Hammond v. Howard, 828 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). “§ 751.05(7), Fla. Stat. (2001). Because an erroneous legal standard was applied below, this cause is remanded for reconsideration under the proper standard.”
Quevedo-Woolf v. Overholser, 820 S.E.2d 817 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018). “Fla. Stat. § 751.05 (2007). The Act also provides a simple method for parents to regain full custody of their children-filing the appropriate petition to terminate the custody order and demonstrating to the court that they are "a fit parent," or demonstrating that all parties to…”
K.N.B. v. M.C., 779 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
D.B. v. W.J.P., 962 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). “Further, section 751.05 states in pertinent part: (1) At the hearing on the petition for temporary custody, the court must hear the evidence concerning a minor child’s need for care by the petitioner, all other matters required to be set forth in the petition, and the objections…”
Db v. Wjp, 962 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.