Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 768.75 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 768.075 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 768.075 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 768.075

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 768
NEGLIGENCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 768.075
768.075 Immunity from liability for injury to trespassers on real property.
(1) A person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property, or an agent of such person or organization, shall not be held liable for any civil damages for death of or injury or damage to a trespasser upon the property when such trespasser was under the influence of alcoholic beverages with a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher, when such trespasser was under the influence of any chemical substance set forth in s. 877.111, when such trespasser was illegally under the influence of any substance controlled under chapter 893, or if the trespasser is affected by any of the aforesaid substances to the extent that her or his normal faculties are impaired. However, the person or organization owning or controlling the interest in real property shall not be immune from liability if gross negligence or intentional misconduct on the part of such person or organization or agent thereof is a proximate cause of the death of or injury or damage to the trespasser.
(2) A person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property, or an agent of such person or organization, is not liable for any civil damages for the death of or injury or damage to any discovered or undiscovered trespasser, except as provided in paragraphs (3)(a), (b), and (c), and regardless of whether the trespasser was intoxicated or otherwise impaired.
(3)(a) As used in this subsection, the term:
1. “Invitation” means that the visitor entering the premises has an objectively reasonable belief that he or she has been invited or is otherwise welcome on that portion of the real property where injury occurs.
2. “Discovered trespasser” means a person who enters real property without invitation, either express or implied, and whose actual physical presence was detected, within 24 hours preceding the accident, by the person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property or to whose actual physical presence the person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property was alerted by a reliable source within 24 hours preceding the accident. The status of a person who enters real property shall not be elevated to that of an invitee, unless the person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property has issued an express invitation to enter the property or has manifested a clear intent to hold the property open to use by persons pursuing purposes such as those pursued by the person whose status is at issue.
3. “Undiscovered trespasser” means a person who enters property without invitation, either express or implied, and whose actual physical presence was not detected, within 24 hours preceding the accident, by the person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property.
(b) To avoid liability to undiscovered trespassers, a person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property must refrain from intentional misconduct that proximately causes injury to the undiscovered trespasser, but has no duty to warn of dangerous conditions. To avoid liability to discovered trespassers, a person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property must refrain from gross negligence or intentional misconduct that proximately causes injury to the discovered trespasser, and must warn the trespasser of dangerous conditions that are known to the person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property but that are not readily observable by others.
(c) This subsection shall not be interpreted or construed to alter the common law as it pertains to the “attractive nuisance doctrine.”
(4) A person or organization owning or controlling an interest in real property, or an agent of such person or organization, shall not be held liable for negligence that results in the death of, injury to, or damage to a person who is attempting to commit a felony or who is engaged in the commission of a felony on the property.
History.s. 1, ch. 90-140; s. 1161, ch. 97-102; s. 19, ch. 99-225.

F.S. 768.075 on Google Scholar

F.S. 768.075 on CourtListener

Amendments to 768.075


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 768.075

Total Results: 14

Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc. v. Reeves

833 So. 2d 857, 2002 WL 31875183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 1259184

Cited 10 times | Published

for such conduct in construction contracts); § 768.075(1), Fla. Stat. (2001) (duty owed by property owner

State v. FLORIDA CONNSUMRE ACTION NETWORK

830 So. 2d 148, 2002 WL 31251017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 471355

Cited 10 times | Published

undertaken by convenience-store owners; amending section 768.075, restricting the liability of possessors of

Arp v. Waterway East Ass'n

217 So. 3d 117, 2017 WL 1496269, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2017 | Docket: 60265636

Cited 7 times | Published

portion of the real property where injury occurs.” § 768.075(3)(a)l., Fla. Stat. (2011). However, erecting

Quarantello v. Leroy

977 So. 2d 648, 2008 WL 397349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2008 | Docket: 1529949

Cited 7 times | Published

language, "not liable for any action or omission"); § 768.075(1), Fla. Stat. (2007) (employing the phrase, "shall

Poe v. IMC PHOSPHATES MP, INC.

885 So. 2d 397, 2004 WL 2308995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 1685269

Cited 7 times | Published

1413-15; § 36, at 1428, Laws of Fla. (amending section 768.075). [4] In Drady, this court cited to the version

Seaberg v. Steak N' Shake Operations, Inc.

154 F. Supp. 3d 1294, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172973, 2015 WL 9488953

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2015 | Docket: 64306205

Cited 5 times | Published

invitation, either express or implied.” Fla. Stat, § 768.075. This statute, entitled “Immunity from liability

Denise Nicholson v. Stonybrook Apartments, LLC, d/b/a Summit Housing Partners, LLC

154 So. 3d 490, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 183, 2015 WL 71839

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621566

Cited 4 times | Published

plaintiffs status to the land. Id. Section 768.075 of the Florida Statutes provides that “[a]

Byers v. Radiant Group, LLC

966 So. 2d 506, 2007 WL 3034856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 1271871

Cited 4 times | Published

jury should receive an instruction based on section 768.075(4), Florida Statutes (2003). I am inclined

Kuria v. BMLRW, LLLP

101 So. 3d 425, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20811, 2012 WL 6029107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2012 | Docket: 60226327

Cited 3 times | Published

challenges the trial court’s finding that section 768.075(4), Florida Statute (2007), shields property

Robert Schramm v. Adams Homes of Northwest Florida, Inc. and Schumacher and Son Plumbing, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2025 | Docket: 70590491

Published

that Adams was insulated from liability. See § 768.075(2), Fla. Stat. (2024) (immunizing landowners from

Kinsale Insurance Company v. Pride of St. Lucie Lodge 1189, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 18, 2025 | Docket: 68058713

Published

Argued: Dec 7, 2023

than they do an invitee. See Fla. Stat. § 768.075(2), (3)(b) (2015). With respect to invitees

PRIDE OF ST. LUCIE LODGE 1189, INC. d/b/a TEMPLE 853 v. TEAIRA NICOLE REED

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2020 | Docket: 18604170

Published

trial court erred in denying its request for a section 768.075(4), Florida Statutes (2016), “felony defense”

Ryan v. National Marine Manufacturers Ass'n

103 So. 3d 1001, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21660, 2012 WL 6602861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2012 | Docket: 60226832

Published

not liable for Collins’ death, pursuant to section 768.075(1), Florida Statutes (2009), which provides:

Sierra v. Sunshine Developers, LLC

994 So. 2d 424, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16324, 2008 WL 4643325

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 64856733

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 768.075, Fla. Stat. (2006).