Cases from cite.case.law:

M. BLAKE, v. CITY OF PORT SAINT LUCIE, a a, 73 So. 3d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The issue in this appeal is whether section 768.095, Florida Statutes (2009), abrogates the absolute . . . We hold that section 768.095 does not abrogate such absolute immunity. . . . Section 768.095 states: An employer who discloses information about a former or current employee to a . . . Thus, section 768.095 applies to only employers which are not public officials. . . . In this case, we hold that the same reasoning applies to section 768.095 standing alone. . . .

ARCE, v. WACKENHUT CORPORATION,, 40 So. 3d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . the FBI Report is not inadmissible hearsay, any statements made by Hill are protected under section 768.095 . . . this section is immune from civil liability for such disclosure or its consequences as provided in s. 768.095 . . . Section 768.095 clearly excepts information disclosed by the former employer that is knowingly false. . . .

BUSH, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY,, 373 F. App'x 936 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 768.095. . . .

A. BATES, v. ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE,, 31 So. 3d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . information pursuant to this section is immune from civil liability in accordance with the provisions of s. 768.095 . . . Section 768.095, Florida Statutes (2008), provides: An employer who discloses information about a former . . . Under section 768.095, if that administrator discloses knowingly false information, it loses its immunity . . .

FALIC, v. LEGG MASON WOOD WALKER, INC. a, 347 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . § 768.095; and (3) Expressions of fair comment and criticism on any public, governmental, political . . .

THOMPSON, v. ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., 224 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Stat. 768.095 (1997). . . .

D. THOMAS, v. TAMPA BAY DOWNS, INC. d b a, 761 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 768.095, Fla. Stat. (1993) ; see also Linafelt v. . . . This section provides: 768.095. . . .

A. LINAFELT, v. BEVERLY ENTERPRISES- FLORIDA, INC. d b a, 745 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Sec. 768.095, Fla.- Stat. (1997). . . . statutory and common law privileges were incorrectly submitted to the jury, and the jury did not address § 768.095 . . . Once again, we do not have a jury verdict that follows section 768.095, Florida Statutes. . . .

A. LINAFELT, v. BEV, INC. a k a, 662 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Enterprises contends that it was entitled to a qualified privilege for this communication under section 768.095 . . .