Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 7
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-28
Citation: 192 So. 3d 431, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2016 WL 1700521, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 885
Snippet: rational justification.’ ” Salfi, 422 U.S. at 768, 95 S.Ct. 2457. Salfi also cited Richardson v. Belcher
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-11-16
Citation: 73 So. 3d 905, 33 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 135, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18119, 2011 WL 5554850
Snippet: J. The issue in this appeal is whether section 768.095, Florida Statutes (2009), abrogates the absolute
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-07
Citation: 40 So. 3d 813, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9869, 2010 WL 2670881
Snippet: statements made by Hill are protected under section 768.095, Florida Statutes, which provides: An employer
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-24
Citation: 31 So. 3d 210, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2102
Snippet: in accordance with the provisions of s. 768.095. Section 768.095, Florida Statutes (2008), provides: An
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-05-12
Citation: 761 So. 2d 401, 2000 WL 571413
Snippet: presumed to have been made in good faith. See § 768.095, Fla. Stat. (1993)[1]; see also Linafelt v. Beverly
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-10-12
Citation: 745 So. 2d 386, 1999 WL 821095
Snippet: former employee protected under chapter 760. Sec. 768.095, Fla. Stat. (1997). The statute is an affirmative
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-11-03
Citation: 662 So. 2d 986, 1995 WL 642669
Snippet: privilege for this communication under section 768.095, Florida Statutes (1993) and Nodar v. Galbreath