Florida Statute 768.125 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 768
NEGLIGENCE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 768.125

768.125 Liability for injury or damage resulting from intoxication.—A person who sells or furnishes alcoholic beverages to a person of lawful drinking age shall not thereby become liable for injury or damage caused by or resulting from the intoxication of such person, except that a person who willfully and unlawfully sells or furnishes alcoholic beverages to a person who is not of lawful drinking age or who knowingly serves a person habitually addicted to the use of any or all alcoholic beverages may become liable for injury or damage caused by or resulting from the intoxication of such minor or person.

History.—s. 1, ch. 80-37.

F.S. 768.125 on Google Scholar

F.S. 768.125 on CourtListener

Amendments to 768.125

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 768.125

Total Results: 78

Bankston v. Brennan

507 So. 2d 1385, 55 U.S.L.W. 2679

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1987 | Docket: 459954

Cited 34 times | Published

question of great public importance: DOES SECTION 768.125, FLORIDA STATUTES, CREATE A CAUSE OF ACTION

Kitchen v. K-Mart Corp.

697 So. 2d 1200, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 435, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1052, 1997 WL 417280

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1997 | Docket: 1777263

Cited 22 times | Published

alleging a violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1983). Section 768.125 states: A person who sells

Migliore v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc.

448 So. 2d 978, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2728

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 429802

Cited 21 times | Published

is whether, prior to the effective date of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981),[*] a vendor who sells

Wal-Mart Stores v. McDonald

676 So. 2d 12, 1996 WL 312805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1996 | Docket: 1692907

Cited 20 times | Published

tort; Publix was charged with a willful tort. Section 768.125 indicates that the culpable vendor becomes

Coker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

642 So. 2d 774, 1994 WL 483397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1994 | Docket: 173020

Cited 16 times | Published

sold alcoholic beverages in contravention of section 768.125, Florida Statutes. The habitual drunkards to

Ellis v. NGN of Tampa, Inc.

586 So. 2d 1042, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 619, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1625, 1991 WL 183088

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1991 | Docket: 1488073

Cited 13 times | Published

complaint also alleged that the provisions of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1987), authorized this cause

Bennett v. Godfather's Pizza, Inc.

570 So. 2d 1351, 1990 WL 175096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 371784

Cited 10 times | Published

denied, 172 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1965); see also § 768.125, Fla. Stat. (1985). The rationale for not holding

Willis v. Strickland

436 So. 2d 1011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1983 | Docket: 1701285

Cited 9 times | Published

Judge. This case involves an interpretation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides in

Kaminer v. ECKERD CORP. OF FLORIDA, INC.

966 So. 2d 452, 2007 WL 2847967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 1678898

Cited 8 times | Published

liability was based on a specific statute, section 768.125, which makes a seller of alcohol liable where

Grobman v. Posey

863 So. 2d 1230, 2003 WL 23094824

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2003 | Docket: 1728615

Cited 8 times | Published

selling alcohol to a person under twenty-one. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991) provided that a "culpable

Bardy v. WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY

643 So. 2d 46, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9155, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1994 | Docket: 1493219

Cited 8 times | Published

because, in my view, this case is controlled by section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1989). When viewed in the

Dowell v. Gracewood Fruit Co.

559 So. 2d 217, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 168, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 472, 1990 WL 40368

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1990 | Docket: 1751339

Cited 8 times | Published

case turns on the construction to be given section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1989), which reads: A person

Forlaw v. Fitzer

456 So. 2d 432, 42 A.L.R. 4th 579

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1984 | Docket: 1446550

Cited 8 times | Published

80-37, section 1, Laws of Florida (codified at section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1983)), which occurred after

Armstrong v. Munford, Inc.

451 So. 2d 480

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1984 | Docket: 1483398

Cited 8 times | Published

enactment of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981)? The district court held that section 768.125, Florida

Quarantello v. Leroy

977 So. 2d 648, 2008 WL 397349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2008 | Docket: 1529949

Cited 7 times | Published

terminology, "shall have no cause of action"); § 768.125, Fla. Stat. (2007) (using the phrase, "shall not

Carroll Air Systems, Inc. v. Greenbaum

629 So. 2d 914, 1993 WL 492538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 1264558

Cited 7 times | Published

furnishing of liquor to its employee, citing section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1989). In addition, because

Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Austin

658 So. 2d 1064, 1995 WL 385375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 439441

Cited 6 times | Published

a cause of action based on Florida Statute section 768.125 which required Wurtz to prove a willful and

Sabo v. Shamrock Communications, Inc.

566 So. 2d 267, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6907, 1990 WL 71773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1990 | Docket: 547639

Cited 6 times | Published

use of alcoholic beverages, as required by section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1983). Accordingly, we reverse

Gorman v. Albertson's, Inc.

519 So. 2d 1119, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 444, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 572, 1988 WL 9030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 1698537

Cited 6 times | Published

Albertson's was liable to him pursuant to section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1979), because one of its

Ellis v. NGN of Tampa, Inc.

561 So. 2d 1209, 1990 WL 48621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1990 | Docket: 1480839

Cited 5 times | Published

and also states, tracking the language of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1987), that the appellees

Pritchard v. Jax Liquors, Inc.

499 So. 2d 926, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 38

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1443759

Cited 5 times | Published

50, Fla. Stat. The motion also asserted that § 768.125, Fla. Stat., the statute upon which the action

Case v. Newman

154 So. 3d 1151, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20438, 2014 WL 7202971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 60245432

Cited 4 times | Published

prima facie case of any violation of section 768.125.3 Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2010), provides:

French v. City of West Palm Beach

513 So. 2d 1356, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1987 | Docket: 1295241

Cited 4 times | Published

action which arose prior to June 2, 1978. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1985) provides: *1358 Liability

Puglia v. Drinks on the Beach, Inc.

457 So. 2d 519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1984 | Docket: 426427

Cited 3 times | Published

the appellant alleged that appellee violated section 768.125, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), and as a result

Barber v. Jensen

428 So. 2d 770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1983 | Docket: 2532911

Cited 3 times | Published

Prior to May 24, 1980, the effective date of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981), did a third party

Migliore v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc.

425 So. 2d 20, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1982 | Docket: 1182632

Cited 3 times | Published

injuries by intoxicated minors when it passed Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981). They fashioned a

Stephanie De La Torre, Humberto Miranda, and Carla Gallardo v. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Flanigan's Bar and Grill

187 So. 3d 330, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3606, 2016 WL 889334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3042758

Cited 2 times | Published

trial court dismissed the suit, finding that section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2011), . insulated businesses

Weber v. Marino Parking Systems, Inc.

100 So. 3d 729, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19090, 2012 WL 5373438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2012 | Docket: 60225933

Cited 2 times | Published

who sell or furnish alcoholic beverages. See § 768.125, Fla. Stat. (2007) (limiting liability for consequences

John v. Furry v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida

685 F.3d 1224, 2012 WL 2478232, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13397

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2012 | Docket: 1073590

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida’s dram shop act, codified at Fla. Stat. § 768.125, 4 as well as various state law negligence

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Grossman

96 So. 3d 917, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10480, 2012 WL 2400887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2012 | Docket: 60311592

Cited 2 times | Published

negligent furnishing of alcoholic beverages. E.g., § 768.125, Fla. Stat. (1980). However, these duties were

ESTATE OF MASSAD EX REL. WILSON v. Granzow

886 So. 2d 1050, 2004 WL 2600137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2004 | Docket: 1380454

Cited 2 times | Published

rule of law" in Florida. Granzow argues that section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2003), acts as a "complete

Fritsch v. Rocky Bayou Country Club, Inc.

799 So. 2d 433, 2001 WL 1439881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 1681720

Cited 2 times | Published

the use of ... alcoholic beverages" under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1997).[1] The trial court

Kirkman Road Sports Pub & Restaurant, Inc. v. Dempsey

723 So. 2d 384, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1998 | Docket: 1693517

Cited 2 times | Published

its liability to the plaintiffs pursuant to section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1995), which provides: A

Bankston v. Brennan

480 So. 2d 246, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 90

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1985 | Docket: 1667468

Cited 2 times | Published

specifically basing his cause of action on section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1983), which was in effect

Barber v. Jensen

450 So. 2d 830

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 2580835

Cited 2 times | Published

Prior to May 24, 1980, the effective date of section 768.125, Florida Statutes *831 (1981), did a third

Fitzer v. Forlaw

435 So. 2d 839

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1983 | Docket: 1328334

Cited 2 times | Published

served "to a person habitually addicted... ." Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981). Accordingly, we hold

Hayes Robertson Group v. Cherry

260 So. 3d 1126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2018 | Docket: 8395129

Cited 1 times | Published

an exception in Florida’s Dram Shop Act, section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2014), permitting a claim

Okeechobee Aerie 4137, Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc. v. Wilde

199 So. 3d 333, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11736, 2016 WL 4132105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2016 | Docket: 60256584

Cited 1 times | Published

alleging they were negligent and in violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes, for serving alcohol to “a

Evans v. McCabe 415, Inc.

168 So. 3d 238, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197, 2015 WL 1609930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2015 | Docket: 60248622

Cited 1 times | Published

liability statute, codified at section 768.125, Florida Statutes. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2009)

Fleuridor v. Surf Café

775 So. 2d 411, 2001 WL 6180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2001 | Docket: 1667894

Cited 1 times | Published

off for his safety and the safety of others. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes, provides A person who sells

Williams v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

957 F. Supp. 1246, 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 905, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2768, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2208, 1997 WL 85461

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1997 | Docket: 1148963

Cited 1 times | Published

alcoholism. Plaintiff claims that Florida Statute section 768.125 gave rise to a duty on the part of Defendant

Russo v. Plant City Moose Lodge No. 1668

656 So. 2d 957, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6776, 1995 WL 370676

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1995 | Docket: 64757329

Cited 1 times | Published

Russo, with his vehicle. She argues that under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991)1, the Moose Lodge

Roster v. Moulton

602 So. 2d 975, 1992 WL 153964

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1992 | Docket: 1694098

Cited 1 times | Published

complaint also alleged that Nick's Bar violated section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1988), when it served alcohol

Kirkland v. Johnson

499 So. 2d 899, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 8

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1986 | Docket: 2555312

Cited 1 times | Published

that the court erred in its construction of section 768.125, Florida Statutes. In dismissing appellant's

Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper

408 So. 2d 758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1982 | Docket: 1732387

Cited 1 times | Published

subject is that no cause of action exists. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), provides as

Stricklin v. Allen

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2025 | Docket: 69612566

Published

guardian under the dram-shop exception statute. See § 768.125, Fla. Stat. (providing that a person who “sells

Guardianship of Jacquelyn Anne Faircloth v. Main Street Entertainment, Inc., etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2024 | Docket: 68317971

Published

the dram-shop exception contained in section 768.125, Florida Statutes, against a vendor who

ROLANDO ORAMA GARCIA v. SERGE MYRTIL

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2023 | Docket: 67657788

Published

Nightclub pursuant to Florida’s Dram Shop Law, § 768.125, Florida Statutes, based on allegations that the

VINCENT CHARLES SALERNO, etc., ESTATE OF SUSAN M. SALERNO v. DEL MAR FINANCIAL SERVICE, LLC, GLADSTONE LAW GROUP, P.A.

248 So. 3d 1186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2018 | Docket: 7061983

Published

attempts to state a cause of action based upon section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2013), but that statute

Gonzalez v. Stoneybrook West Golf Club, LLC

225 So. 3d 891, 2017 WL 2988826, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2017 | Docket: 6123643

Published

reverse dram shop liability statute, codified at section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2014). This statute provides

Hall v. West

157 So. 3d 329, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 110, 2015 WL 72346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621517

Published

found in Bardy” We agree. Section 768.125,' Florida Statutes (2008), is at play in this

Cook v. MillerCoors, LLC

872 F. Supp. 2d 1346, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73205, 2012 WL 1901818

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 25, 2012 | Docket: 65982710

Published

beverages to that person.” Id. at 1361. Furthermore, § 768.125 of the Florida Statutes limits liability for the

Founders Insurance v. Tome

878 F. Supp. 2d 1266, 2012 WL 2928981, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101936

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2012 | Docket: 65983289

Published

Sports Bar in violation of Florida Statute section 768.125. (Doc. 40-2). This action alleged that Tome

Cook v. MillerCoors, LLC

829 F. Supp. 2d 1208, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125183, 2011 WL 5359713

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2011 | Docket: 65977095

Published

. cation of such minor or person. Fla. Stat. § 768.125. Cook has not alleged that either of the exceptions

Hetherly v. Sawgrass Tavern Inc.

975 So. 2d 1266, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3468, 2008 WL 649574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 1424680

Published

crime, on what basis should Judges read into section 768.125 an implied civil law avoidance of the forcible

Luque v. Ale House Management, Inc.

962 So. 2d 1062, 2007 WL 2403171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2007 | Docket: 1519135

Published

Ale House breached its duty to Luque under section 768.125, Florida Statutes, when it knowingly sold him

Murphy v. Southern Mutual Management Corp.

936 So. 2d 786, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14835, 2006 WL 2547276

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2006 | Docket: 64846368

Published

a.m. that morning, alleging a violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2000), which provides: A

Graham v. Stephens

779 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3416, 2001 WL 256035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2001 | Docket: 64804260

Published

using it, is not one of those areas. Compare § 768.125, Fla. Stat. (2000) (prohibiting sales of alcohol

Voronsoff v. Respectable Street, Inc.

754 So. 2d 808, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3708, 2000 WL 314525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 64796319

Published

697 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1997) does not render section 768.125 unconstitutional. AFFIRMED. DELL, STONE and

Sipes v. Albertson's Inc.

728 So. 2d 1243, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4580, 1999 WL 193115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1999 | Docket: 64787070

Published

habitual drunkard. Ch. 80-37, § 1, Laws of Fla.; § 768.125(Fla.Stat.l997). But here the plaintiff has, in

Starita v. West Putnam Post Number 10164, Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Inc.

678 So. 2d 521, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 1996 WL 491715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1996 | Docket: 64766763

Published

“drunk or intoxicated in direct violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991).” On June 13,1995

Leigh v. Don Bailey Carpets, Inc.

662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11668, 1995 WL 654486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1995 | Docket: 64759953

Published

William D. Bailey violated any duty under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1993) regarding the serving

Leigh v. Don Bailey Carpets, Inc.

662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11668, 1995 WL 654486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1995 | Docket: 64759953

Published

William D. Bailey violated any duty under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1993) regarding the serving

Persen v. Southland Corp.

656 So. 2d 453, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 218, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 732, 1995 WL 273932

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1995 | Docket: 64757216

Published

certified to be of great public importance: DOES SECTION 768.125, FLORIDA STATUTES, WHICH IMPOSES LIABILITY

Nieves v. Camacho Clothes, Inc.

645 So. 2d 507, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10122, 1994 WL 576101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64752233

Published

consume such beverages on licensed premises. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: Liability

Persen v. Southland Corp.

640 So. 2d 1228, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7889, 1994 WL 414596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1994 | Docket: 64750082

Published

automobile accident and 7-11’s alleged violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes. We affirm. Plaintiffs’ complaint

O'Neale v. Hershoff

634 So. 2d 644, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10630, 1993 WL 414264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1993 | Docket: 64747382

Published

before us is the proper interpretation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1991). The statute provides

Echeverri v. Saga Bay Co.

624 So. 2d 416, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9982, 1993 WL 390372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1993 | Docket: 64743020

Published

against Burgin, individually, for violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1989). See *417Ellis v.

R. Hughes, Inc. v. Mitchell

617 So. 2d 767, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4602, 1993 WL 128853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1993 | Docket: 64695880

Published

furnished alcoholic beverages to Richard. Section 768.125, Fla.Stat. (1989). Appellee concedes that there

Dixon v. Saunders

565 So. 2d 802, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5420, 1990 WL 105513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1990 | Docket: 64652401

Published

recover damages for their daughter’s death under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1987). That section imposes

Tuttle v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.

551 So. 2d 477, 1988 WL 36923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1989 | Docket: 527208

Published

said beverages on the licensed premises... . Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), however, limits

Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantley

483 So. 2d 895, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 564, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 64617570

Published

which is necessary to establish liability. See Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1983); Lonestar Florida

Roberts v. Roman

457 So. 2d 578, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2184, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1984 | Docket: 64607409

Published

allegedly sold alcoholic beverages. We affirm. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1980), imposing liability

Booth v. Travelers Insurance Co.

452 So. 2d 1083, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1984 | Docket: 64605935

Published

Stat. (Supp.1978) prior to the effective date of § 768.125, Fla.Stat. (1981) may be liable in negligence

Armstrong v. Munford, Inc.

439 So. 2d 1009, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1983 | Docket: 64600314

Published

775.082 or S. 775.083, and provisions of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981), which read: A person

Burns v. Three of a Kind, Inc.

439 So. 2d 1004, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1983 | Docket: 64600310

Published

red light and collided with appellant’s car. Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981) was in effect at the

McCarthy v. Danny's West, Inc.

421 So. 2d 756, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1982 | Docket: 64593154

Published

Appellee urges that the case is controlled by Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981). These questions have

MacArthur v. Travelers Insurance Co.

400 So. 2d 20, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 64583396

Published

evil of drunk driving, it is amazing that Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1980 Supp.) was ever adopted