Syfert Injury Law Firm

Ricks v. Loyola

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-06-20

Citation: 822 So. 2d 502, 2002 WL 1338103

Snippet: explaining why, was a purposeful violation of section 768.014, which could have influenced the jury. Because

Pirez v. Brescher

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-08-29

Citation: 584 So. 2d 993, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 583, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1522, 1991 WL 165229

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. This subsection is part of the statutory waiver

Orange County v. Gipson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-09-07

Citation: 548 So. 2d 658, 1989 WL 104500

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. (b) For purposes of this section, the requirements

Orange County v. Gipson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-02

Citation: 539 So. 2d 526, 1989 WL 16630

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. (b) For purposes of this section, the requirements

Menendez v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-09

Citation: 515 So. 2d 1377, 1987 WL 2263

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14.

State ex rel. Manatee County ex rel. Manatee County Sheriff's Department v. Kruysman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-09-20

Citation: 475 So. 2d 1007, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2195, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15918

Snippet: the case of a counterclaim authorized by section 768.14, Florida Statutes (1983). We find it unnecessary

Lee v. South Broward Hosp. Dist.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-09

Citation: 473 So. 2d 1322

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14.[1] Pursuant to this section, the trial court dismissed

Ashley v. Lámar

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-05-02

Citation: 468 So. 2d 433, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1084

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14.

Askew v. County of Volusia

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-05

Citation: 450 So. 2d 233, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12664

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. This statute provides for two conditions that

Mrowczynski v. Vizenthal

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-02-29

Citation: 445 So. 2d 1099

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. In order to comply with the foregoing section

Levine v. Dade County School Bd.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-08

Citation: 442 So. 2d 210, 15 Educ. L. Rep. 437, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3160

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. There is some support in this statute for the

Levine v. Dade County School Board

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-09-28

Citation: 419 So. 2d 808, 6 Educ. L. Rep. 1213, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21284

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. In our opinion, the failure to serve notice of

O'Donnell v. Broward County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-21

Citation: 417 So. 2d 1043, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22220

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. The county repeated the foregoing in its affirmative

Whitney v. Marion County Hosp. Dist.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-07

Citation: 416 So. 2d 500

Snippet: as may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to § 768.14.

Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-09-08

Citation: 403 So. 2d 558, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21024

Snippet: contention on appeal is that Sections 768.28(6) and 768.14,3 Florida *560Statutes (1975), when construed together

Beard v. Hambrick

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-05

Citation: 396 So. 2d 708

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. .... (12) Every claim against the state or one

Department of Transp. v. Burnette

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-06-11

Citation: 384 So. 2d 916, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16911

Snippet: monetary limitations imposed by Florida Statutes § 768.14 on suits for damages. The majority holds that plaintiffs'

Perez v. Miami Dade Water & Sewer Authority

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-06-19

Citation: 372 So. 2d 185, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15323

Snippet: be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to section 768.14, Florida Statutes.” In our recent opinion in Scavella

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-09-08

Snippet: may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s. 768.14. (Emphasis supplied.) (7) In actions brought pursuant

Langford v. Wauchula State Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-10-03

Citation: 4 So. 2d 10, 148 Fla. 236, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 870

Snippet: So. 772; Lovett v. Lovett, 93 Fla. 611,112 So. 768; 14 R.C.L., Page 1367. Atwell v. The Western Fire Ins