Cases from cite.case.law:

SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART SHIPLEY, P. A. a S. II, P. A. L. P. A. P. L. P. A. v. STATE, 194 So. 3d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Because of the sea change that occurred as a result of the Legislature’s enactment o.f 768.25, Gamble . . .

WALKER, v. BAILEY,, 89 So. 3d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 768.25, Fla. Stat. (2011); Dudley v. . . . When that authority is invoked, though section 768.25 does not expressly demand a hearing, Florida courts . . . trial, the trial court resolves questions concerning the apportionment of proceeds between survivors. § 768.25 . . .

OVEISSI, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,, 498 F. Supp. 2d 268 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . . §§ 768.16-768.25 (2007); 740 Ill. Comp. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 948 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 768.25, Fla. Stat. Court approval of settlements. Rule References Fla. Prob. R. 5.040 Notice. . . .

ESTATE HEISER, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, D. v., 466 F. Supp. 2d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 768.16-768.25 (2005). . . .

EDMAN, v. A. MARANO, a, 177 F. App'x 884 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . to the issue of damages; third, the district court erred in its interpretation of Florida Statute § 768.25 . . .

BRUNSON, A. E. v. McKAY, D., 905 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 768.25 of the Act governs the settlement of wrongful death claims for which an action is pending . . . Under section 768.25, a personal representative may not settle a pending wrongful death action as to . . . Accordingly, under section 768.25, each of the Children had the right as a “survivor” to object to the . . . probate court was not obligated to give the Children a hearing on their timely objection because section 768.25 . . . Although section 768.25 does not expressly provide for a hearing, routine practice under the Act requires . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 848 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 768.25, Fla. Stat. Court approval of settlements. Rule References Fla. Prob. R. 5.040 Notice. . . .

C. THOMPSON, C. v. K. HODSON, M. D. K. M. D. P. A. K. M. D. v. C. C. K. M. D. v., 825 So. 2d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 768.25, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . even though acceptance of the offer might well have been conditioned upon court approval under section 768.25 . . . See § 768.25, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

THOMAS, v. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE WAL- MART STORES, INC. ASSOCIATES HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN,, 210 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Moreover, Thomas argues that section 768.25 prevents apportionment of a settlement “which affects a survivor . . . determine the otherwise nonremova-ble claims, including those enumerated under Florida Statute section 768.25 . . .

DUDLEY v. McCORMICK,, 799 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 768.20, 768.25, Fla. Stat. (2000) (Wrongful Death); see also Guadalupe v. . . . See § 768.25, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

GUADALUPE, v. PETERSON, a, 779 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . right to claim compensation, that the trial court never approved the settlement as required by section 768.25 . . . See § 768.25. . . .

HESS, v. HESS,, 758 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 768.25, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

In ESTATE OF C. CATAPANE, C. P. A. C. v. By, 759 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 768.25, Fla. Stat. . . .

KILPATRICK, v. OGDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. d b a, 745 So. 2d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Kilpa-trick’s wife was paid in full, and Kilpatrick was paid $100,000 as permitted under section 768.25 . . .

PAUSHTER v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, d b a, 664 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . and receiving a judgment for damages pursuant to the statutory waiver of sovereign immunity, section 768.25 . . .

PEARSON, a v. A. DeLAMERENS, M. D. A. M. D. P. A. M. D. C. M. D. A. M. D. A. M. D. P. A., 656 So. 2d 217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 768.25, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . as to amount or apportionment, then the settlement is not effective unless approved by the court. § 768.25 . . . $10,000 offer, subject to the father’s ability to object to the $10,000 amount pursuant to section 768.25 . . . settlement of the father’s claim should be approved over the father’s objection pursuant to section 768.25 . . .

PETERSON J. Co- A. J. v. MORTON F. PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC. a C. R. N. H. C. N. M., 656 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . The settlement had not been judicially approved pursuant to section 768.25, Florida Statutes (1993), . . .

CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK, v. BRILL,, 638 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Pursuant to section 768.25, Florida Statutes (1993), the trial court approved the settlement and allocated . . . affects a survivor who is a minor or an incompetent shall be effective unless approved by the court.” § 768.25 . . .

COLVIN, v. J. CURTIS,, 860 F. Supp. 1503 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . punitive damages on the § 1983 claim were unavailable against him as Sheriff in light of Fla.Stat. 768.25 . . . Florida Statute 768.25 is irrelevant to the issue of punitive damages in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. . . .

MAHON, v. CITY OF LARGO, FLORIDA, a, 829 F. Supp. 377 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . The issue in the instant ease is whether the waiver provisions of the Tort Claims Act, Section 768.25 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 607 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 768.25, Fla.Stat. Court approval of settlements. . . .

F. SULLIVAN, Jr. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, a, 595 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 768.25 provides that while an action is pending, no settlement which affects a minor can be effective . . .

COLUMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT,, 574 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Relying on section 768.25, Florida Statutes (1987), the Sheriff’s Office argues that until court approval . . . Section 768.25, Florida Statutes (footnote 2, supra). . . . Section 768.25, requiring court approval of settlements in wrongful death actions, provides: While an . . .

S. NIXON, S. P. A. v. BRYSON, M. Ad, 488 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . .-23, 768.25, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . unless the trial court is satisfied it is in the minor’s best interests. §§ 744.387(1), (3)(a), 768.23, 768.25 . . . for any amount awarded for the benefit of a minor child ... pursuant to the Florida Guardianship law. 768.25 . . .

S. GERARD, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 472 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1985)

. . . We, however, do not agree that payment of the maximum amount permitted by section 768.25 abrogated the . . . Section 768.25(5) provides, in pertinent part: However, a judgment or judgments may be claimed and rendered . . .

ESTATE OF G. TODISCO, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 757 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)

. . . Gross Wagers April 2, 1973 $350.84 3 255.75 4 4,509.90 5 11,427.30 6 1.302.00 7 11,647.50 8 10,240.00 9 768.25 . . .

MEEKER a k a v. R. E. ADDISON a, 586 F. Supp. 216 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 768.25 [sic]. . . . Even if Fla.Stat. § 768.25 [sic] could be read as a waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity, “[t]he Eleventh . . .

R. CATE, a v. G. OLDHAM, Jr., 707 F.2d 1176 (11th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 768.25. . . . Even if Fla.Stat. § 768.25 could be read as a waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity, “[t]he Eleventh . . .

MAUGERI, Jr. Jr. Jr. III v. PLOURDE,, 396 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . during trial — affected a minor survivor, the trial judge approved the settlement as provided in Section 768.25 . . . Section 768.25, Florida Statutes (1977), thereof provides: Court approval of settlement. . . .

v., 28 B.T.A. 525 (B.T.A. 1933)

. . . Deduct: Timber sold in 1917_$40, 000. 00 Less: Expense of sale_ 2,231.75 Proceeds of sale of timber_ 37, 768.25 . . .