Syfert Injury Law Firm

Mary E. Sheffield, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-11-18

Snippet: prior to its effective date” (first quoting § 768.71(2), Fla. Stat., and then quoting Mudano v. St

AMERICAN PRIME TITLE SERVICES, LLC v. ZHI WANG

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-03

Snippet: governing damages in negligence actions. Section 768.71(3) of the Florida Statutes, addressing the applicability

BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA v. CH2M HILL, INC. and TRIPLE R PAVING, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-07-22

Snippet: “[e]xcept as otherwise specifically provided.” § 768.71(1), Fla. Stat. (2018). That provision states in

Orange County v. Buchman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-01-08

Citation: 183 So. 3d 457, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 310, 2016 WL 81661

Snippet: which this part applies.” Section 768.71(1), provides that sections 768.71 through 768.81, Florida Statutes

Current Builders v. First Sealord Sur.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-04

Citation: 984 So. 2d 526, 2008 WL 2261502, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8127

Snippet: for damages, whether in tort or in contract." § 768.71(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). Section 768.74(1) provides

Yoder Bros., Inc. v. Weygant

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-25

Citation: 973 So. 2d 625, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 785, 2008 WL 199897

Snippet: defendant in an action brought under the FCRA. See § 768.71(3) (providing that "[i]f a provision of this part

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-01

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1067, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 358, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 982, 2006 WL 1491542

Snippet: Statutes, such other provision shall apply." § 768.71(3), Fla. Stat. (1999). Thus, if the offer of judgment

Caruso v. Baumle

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-24

Citation: 880 So. 2d 540, 2004 WL 1403170

Snippet: part" refers to Part II of Chapter 768, sections 768.71-.81, Florida Statutes (2001). Part II applies "[e]xcept

Garcia v. Arraga

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-02-11

Citation: 872 So. 2d 266, 2004 WL 384187

Snippet: Arguably, the preclusive language set forth in Section 768.71(3) of the Florida Statutes would seem to preclude

Osler v. Collins

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-11-14

Citation: 870 So. 2d 65, 2003 WL 22681144

Snippet: collateral source provider's reimbursement. Compare § 768.71(1) (providing that "the court shall reduce the

Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Young

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-07-09

Citation: 848 So. 2d 1242, 2003 WL 21537344

Snippet: cause of action arose on or after July 1, 1986. § 768.71(1) & (2), Fla. Stat. (2001).

Nichols v. State Farm Mut.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-06-13

Citation: 851 So. 2d 742, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794, 2003 WL 21359343

Snippet: Statutes, wherein the Legislature included section 768.71(3), which provides that "[i]f a provision of this

St. John v. Coisman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-11-16

Citation: 799 So. 2d 1110, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16277, 2001 WL 1434195

Snippet: intentional deprivation of civil rights because section 768.71(1), entitled "Applicability, conflicts," provides

Alaqua Lakes Realty, Inc. v. Burch

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-08-03

Citation: 790 So. 2d 604, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10965, 2001 WL 874222

Snippet: action for damages, whether in tort or contract." § 768.71(1), Fla. Stat.

Letzter v. Cephas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-01-24

Citation: 792 So. 2d 481, 2001 WL 55794

Snippet: joint tortfeasors. The title of the Act, sections 768.71-81, is "Damages," and the provision specifically

US SEC. Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-05

Citation: 760 So. 2d 1101, 2000 WL 873183

Snippet: *1106 The lower court also relied upon section 768.71, Florida Statues in determining that the offer

Beauvais v. Edell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-06-07

Citation: 760 So. 2d 262, 2000 WL 726363

Snippet: in conflict section 768.043 would control. See § 768.71(3). There is no conflict of any kind—apart from

Sanchez v. Degoria

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-19

Citation: 733 So. 2d 1103, 1999 WL 314133

Snippet: between state law and federal law claims. Section 768.71(1) provides: "Except as otherwise specifically

Perry v. Allen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-11-19

Citation: 720 So. 2d 614, 1998 WL 798704

Snippet: form is required in cases such as this. See §§ 768.71, .77, Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Kriston v. Webster

Stewart v. Tasnet, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-04-15

Citation: 718 So. 2d 820, 1998 WL 685059

Snippet: for damages, whether in tort or in contract." § 768.71(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). Case law has broadly applied