The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . battery, common law claims in Florida, and inducement to prostitution, in violation of Florida Statute § 796.09 . . .
. . . following claims against the husband: dissolution of marriage; coerced prostitution pursuant to section 796.09 . . .
. . . Count I is an action for coercion of prostitution pursuant to section 796.09, Florida Statutes. . . . The petitioners also claim that this information is privileged under section 796.09 and is not calculated . . . Section 796.09(5) specifically provides that it is not a defense that the plaintiff was paid or otherwise . . . Even though the scope of discovery is generally quite broad, section 796.09 is designed to encourage . . . Had the petitioners brought their lawsuit against Ruzzo and The Boardroom only under section 796.09, . . . The employees’ primary cause of action is based on section 796.09(1), Florida Statutes, which provides . . . prostitution or their past or present earning experience on the basis of subparagraph 5 of section 796.09 . . . But then we get to the definition of “coercion” contained in section 796.09(3): (3) As used in this section . . . “because it beats the heck out of working for a living” simply should not meet the test of section 796.09 . . . Section 796.09 does not appear to be a general prostitute’s relief act. . . .
. . . E., Biggs, who likewise would have ■enjoyed a preferred position as to $796.09, had he complied with . . .
. . . At the end of its fiscal year 1937 the petitioner carried on its books as an asset an item of $796.09 . . . the respondent makes the point that the evidence does not show whether the petitioner claimed the $796.09 . . .