812.037
Construction of ss. 812.012-812.037.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2021 · leading case: State v. Camp
State v. Camp (1992)
“Moreover, section 812.037, Florida Statutes (1989), expressly requires that section 812.”
Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co. (1984)
“[13] The statute itself, in Section 812.037, states that "notwithstanding s.”
Goddard v. State (1984)
“" Fla. Stat. § 812.037 (1983). Thus, to determine whether section 812.”
State v. Telesz (2004)
“§ 812.037, Fla. Stat. (1983). On the other hand, section 775.”
Snyder v. Bell (1999)
“See § 812.037, Fla. Stat. (1995) ("Notwithstanding §§ 775.”
Roush v. State (1982)
“" Given the remedial nature of the act (section 812.037), we find nothing unreasonable about this directive and believe the circuit court was justified in conducting the hearing at the earliest possible opportunity in an effort to prevent further harm.”
State v. Guthrie (1990)
“" The statute contains its own tolling provisions and does not expressly adopt the tolling provision in section 775.”
YAIR BARAK v. ACS INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS, LTD., etc. (2021)
“” See § 812.037, Fla. Stat. (“Notwithstanding s.”
Alvarez v. Striegel (1985)
“037 is not exclusive, section 812.037 states that section 812.035(11) “shall not be construed strictly or liberally, but shall be construed in light of [its] purposes to achieve [its] remedial goals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.