817.29
Cheating.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1966–2013 · leading case: Rollins, Inc. v. Butland
Rollins, Inc. v. Butland (2006)
“01, Florida Statutes (2001), defrauding and cheating consumers in violation of section 817.29, Florida Statutes (2001), and improperly accepting annual renewal payments and other money from consumers in violation of section 812.”
Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLC (2013)
“Section 817.29 F.S. — Cheat, also a third degree felony; c.”
State v. Vikhlyantsev (1992)
“The appellee was charged in a two count information with cheating, in violation of section 817.29, Florida Statutes (1989), and petit theft, in violation of section 812.”
Amlotte v. State (1983)
“Even a common-law cheat is a felony of the third degree under section 817.29. However the inadequacy of the penalty is a problem for the legislature which could best solve this problem by the enactment of a statute providing that whoever, with intent to kill, assaults, or does…”
Rollins, Inc. v. Butland (2006)
“01, Florida Statutes (2001), defrauding and cheating consumers in violation of section 817.29, Florida Statutes (2001), and improperly accepting annual renewal payments and other money from consumers in *1194 violation of section 812.”
State v. Peterson (1966)
“Section 817.29, F.S.A. on Cheating and Fraud, as related to crime, provides : “Whoever is convicted of any gross fraud or cheat at common law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison not exceeding ten years, or in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by fine…”
H. L. A. v. State (1981)
“02, or with cheating, Section 817.29. Compare State v. Peterson, 192 So.”
Darwish v. State (2006)
“Darwish challenges his judgment and sentence for the third-degree felony of cheating, section 817.29, Florida Statutes (2004). Mr.”
State v. Vikhlyantsev (1993)
“The state charged the appellee with cheating in violation of section 817.29, Florida Statutes (1991). In the first appeal, the trial court found that the cheating statute had been repealed by implication by sections 812.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.