Florida Statute 817.41 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 817
FRAUDULENT PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 817.41

817.41 Misleading advertising prohibited.—

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or disseminate or cause to be made or disseminated before the general public of the state, or any portion thereof, any misleading advertisement. Such making or dissemination of misleading advertising shall constitute and is hereby declared to be fraudulent and unlawful, designed and intended for obtaining money or property under false pretenses.

(2) It shall be unlawful for any person to advertise, in any way or by any medium whatsoever, any sale as a “wholesale sale,” “below cost sale,” or terms of similar purport, unless the goods, wares or merchandise offered for sale thereby are offered by the seller at or below his or her delivered net cost price, or below the average wholesale price of such goods, wares, or merchandise. Such advertising of goods, wares, or merchandise for sale shall constitute and is hereby declared to be fraudulent and unlawful, designed and intended for obtaining money or property under false pretenses.

(3) Any retailer using the term or phrase “wholesale sale,” “below cost sale,” or terms of similar purport, in connection with the sale of goods, wares, or merchandise at retail, shall, upon demand by a customer, forthwith make available, unless the same shall have theretofore been made available, to the Better Business Bureau, the Merchant’s Division of the Chamber of Commerce, or to the state attorney’s office for inspection, invoices, or shipping charges or true and correct copies thereof, of any goods, wares, or merchandise so offered for sale, described or represented, indicating the delivery net cost to the seller of the particular goods, wares or merchandise sold or offered for sale, from which the seller’s delivered net cost may be determined. The said retailer shall also and at the same time give all reasonable assistance in determining and ascertaining his or her net cost price of said goods, wares, or merchandise. The said Better Business Bureau, Merchant’s Division of the Chamber of Commerce or state attorney, upon determining the said delivered net cost, shall forthwith issue a certificate evidencing such delivered net cost, as determined, and deliver the same to the retailer for delivery or exhibition to the customer. Unless such certificate shall show a delivered net cost equal to or in excess of the advertised price, the retailer shall be presumed to have violated this law.

(4) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that the person named in or obtaining the benefits of any misleading advertisement or any such sale is responsible for such misleading advertisement or unlawful sale.

(5) No retailer shall knowingly and willfully advertise merchandise for sale at a special or wholesale price, in any way or by any medium whatsoever, if he or she does not have sufficient quantities of the advertised merchandise to meet the reasonably foreseeable demand, unless the fact of limited quantity and the approximate number of items is stated in the advertisement, or unless the retailer provides a means by which the consumer may obtain the advertised item at the advertised price within a reasonable time or a value equivalent thereto.

(6) Any person prevailing in a civil action for violation of this section shall be awarded costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, and may be awarded punitive damages in addition to actual damages proven. This provision is in addition to any other remedies prescribed by law.

History.—s. 2, ch. 59-301; s. 1, ch. 73-60; s. 2, ch. 77-304; s. 1258, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 817.41 on Google Scholar

F.S. 817.41 on CourtListener

Amendments to 817.41

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 817.41

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S817.41 - FRAUD - MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS - M: F

Cases Citing Statute 817.41

Total Results: 64

Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida Corporation

204 F.3d 1069, 46 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 73, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2789, 2000 WL 217490

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 24, 2000 | Docket: 2027931

Cited 304 times | Published

misleading advertising, see Fla. Stat. § 817.41. Both statutory causes of action authorize a court

Rollins, Inc. v. Butland

951 So. 2d 860, 2006 WL 3686484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2006 | Docket: 1280308

Cited 277 times | Published

public of the State of Florida in violation of section 817.41(1), Florida Statutes. For the redress of this

Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.

945 So. 2d 1246, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2952, 2006 WL 3742610

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 1400861

Cited 235 times | Published

public by the FSA Defendants in violation of section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1995).[7] In the present

Frehling Enterprises, Inc. v. International Select Group, Inc.

192 F.3d 1330, 52 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1447, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 25715, 1999 WL 828605

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 1999 | Docket: 237784

Cited 144 times | Published

Stat. ch. 501, false advertising under Fla. Stat. § 817.41, unfair competition under Florida *1335

Terminix International Co. LP v. Palmer Ranch Ltd. Partnership

432 F.3d 1327, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27766, 2005 WL 3445533

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 16, 2005 | Docket: 659297

Cited 123 times | Published

772.104; criminal false advertising, Fla. Stat. § 817.41; various forms of fraud and negligence, forty

Samuels v. King Motor Co. of Fort Lauderdale

782 So. 2d 489, 2001 WL 313872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 456422

Cited 90 times | Published

advertising is defined under section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1997). Section 817.41 provides as follows: (1)

Baby Buddies, Inc. v. Toys" R" US, Inc.

611 F.3d 1308, 95 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1885, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15081, 2010 WL 2853720

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 22, 2010 | Docket: 796297

Cited 80 times | Published

II alleged that Toys R Us violated Fla. Stat. § 817.41, which prohibits misleading advertising, by claiming

Barnes v. Burger King Corp.

932 F. Supp. 1420, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14908, 1996 WL 272350

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1996 | Docket: 2485569

Cited 68 times | Published

Bank, 957 F.2d 856, 858 (11th Cir.1992) (applying § 817.41 of the Florida Fraudulent Practices Act, a related

Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc.

184 F.3d 1292, 1999 WL 622013

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 17, 1999 | Docket: 212261

Cited 43 times | Published

seq., and misleading advertising, see Fla. Stat. § 817.41. Both statutory causes of action authorize a

Dennis Godelia v. Zoll Services, LLC

881 F.3d 1309

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 8, 2018 | Docket: 6299495

Cited 37 times | Published

... any misleading advertisement.” Fla. Stat. § 817.41(1). A j,‘misleading advertisement” is defined

Brown v. GARDENS BY THE SEA S. CONDO. ASS'N.

424 So. 2d 181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1983 | Docket: 1297158

Cited 34 times | Published

to attorneys fees in an action brought under Section 817.41(6), Florida Statutes (1979) and Ocala Music

Vance v. IND. HAMMOCK HUNT & RIDING CLUB, LTD.

403 So. 2d 1367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1981 | Docket: 1250221

Cited 29 times | Published

could not maintain a cause of action under Section 817.41(1), Florida Statutes,[3] because (1) plaintiffs

Himes v. Brown & Co. Securities Corp.

518 So. 2d 937, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 104, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11753, 1987 WL 3367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 1778070

Cited 28 times | Published

False Advertising Statute, section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1985), see § 817.41(6), Fla. Stat. (1985), Florida's

Electro Services, Inc. v. Exide Corporation

847 F.2d 1524, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1160, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8912, 1988 WL 58556

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 28, 1988 | Docket: 273913

Cited 26 times | Published

punitive damages against Exide for violation of Section 817.41 without making a finding of “malice, moral

Kraft Gen. Foods, Inc. v. Rosenblum

635 So. 2d 106, 1994 WL 112249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1994 | Docket: 1353070

Cited 19 times | Published

seeking relief for misleading advertising under section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1991),[1] and a claim for

Sreenivasan Asokan, Chakravarthy Raghavan, Nanni Pidikiti, Rakesh Parekh, Ram Reddy, Madhubala Reddy, Rodger Lodge, Anuradha Asokan, Indep. Anesthesia Servs., P.A. v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co.

302 F. Supp. 3d 1303

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2017 | Docket: 64318018

Cited 17 times | Published

(2) misleading advertising under Florida Statute § 817.41 (Count III); (3) fraud by concealment (Count IV);

Third Party Verification, Inc. v. Signaturelink, Inc.

492 F. Supp. 2d 1314, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43626, 2007 WL 1752541

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2007 | Docket: 2566044

Cited 16 times | Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41, Count V Florida common law of unfair competition

Joseph v. Liberty Nat. Bank

873 So. 2d 384, 2004 WL 741416

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2004 | Docket: 1732859

Cited 12 times | Published

misrepresentation, and one for misleading advertising under section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1999). The Bank moved for

Nutrivida, Inc. v. Inmuno Vital, Inc.

46 F. Supp. 2d 1310, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22314, 1998 WL 1048245

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1998 | Docket: 2355680

Cited 12 times | Published

Inmuno's seal design. Count VII arises under Section 817.41 of the Florida Statutes and states a claim

Major v. State

180 So. 2d 335

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1965 | Docket: 1154589

Cited 12 times | Published

of Dade County upholding the validity of F.S. § 817.41, F.S.A., the basis of the information charging

State v. MARK MARKS, PA

654 So. 2d 1184, 1995 WL 132149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1995 | Docket: 1303813

Cited 11 times | Published

*1191 certain terms and the other statute (section 817.41) prohibited certain activities and proscribed

Izadi v. MacHado (Gus) Ford, Inc.

550 So. 2d 1135, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1806, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4354, 1989 WL 85264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1989 | Docket: 1370890

Cited 9 times | Published

prohibition against misleading advertising, section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1987).[10] See Day v. Le-Jo

Rubin v. Sanford

168 So. 2d 774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1964 | Docket: 1585225

Cited 8 times | Published

advertising (an offense set forth and denounced by section 817.41(1) Florida Statutes, 1961 [F.S.A.]) as set

Remova Pool Fence Co. v. Roth

647 So. 2d 1022, 1994 WL 706302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1994 | Docket: 437251

Cited 6 times | Published

entitled to their attorney's fees pursuant to section 817.41(6) for time spent in litigating count II of

Randolph v. J.M. Smucker Co.

303 F.R.D. 679, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176731, 2014 WL 7330430

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2014 | Docket: 66054277

Cited 5 times | Published

false and misleading advertising, Fla. Stat. § 817.41 (Count II), unjust enrichment (Count III), breach

Smith v. Mellon Bank

957 F.2d 856, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6642

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1992 | Docket: 415028

Cited 5 times | Published

that the advertisement was misleading under Section 817.41, Florida Statutes. A cause of action for

Alvarez v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

905 F. Supp. 2d 1334, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168019, 2012 WL 5932452

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2012 | Docket: 65986560

Cited 4 times | Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41; and punitive damages. II. Jurisdiction and Applicable

Miami Lincoln Mercury v. Kramer

399 So. 2d 1003, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 1652436

Cited 4 times | Published

Mercury, Inc. reasonable attorney's fees under Section 817.41(6), Florida Statutes (1979), upon a holding

Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc.

654 F.3d 1179, 100 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1061, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18324, 2011 WL 3889156

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 2, 2011 | Docket: 520249

Cited 3 times | Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41 (Count V); (6) common law unfair competition (Count

Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc.

654 F.3d 1179, 100 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1061, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18324, 2011 WL 3889156

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 2, 2011 | Docket: 520249

Cited 3 times | Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41 (Count V); (6) common law unfair competition (Count

Black Diamond Properties, Inc. v. Haines

36 So. 3d 819, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7677, 2010 WL 2131712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1639032

Cited 3 times | Published

three claims: (1) misleading advertising under section 817.41 of the Florida Statutes, (2) deceptive and

Transamerica Corp. v. MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, LLC

672 F. Supp. 2d 1353, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114973, 2009 WL 4715853

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2009 | Docket: 2155529

Cited 3 times | Published

40-817.47 are not as limited as section 817.06. Section 817.41, titled "Misleading advertising prohibited

Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc.

636 F. Supp. 2d 1283, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65595, 2009 WL 2137163

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2009 | Docket: 2386933

Cited 3 times | Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41 ("Count V"); (6) common law unfair competition

Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC)

472 B.R. 582

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 65783932

Cited 2 times | Published

Dist.2006) (finding misleading advertising [under § 817.41] is a particularized form of fraud requiring plaintiffs

Smith v. Mellon Bank

957 F.2d 856, 1992 WL 58285

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1992 | Docket: 66270517

Cited 2 times | Published

that the advertisement was misleading under Section 817.41, Florida Statutes. A cause of action for breach

Cross v. Point & Pay, LLC

274 F. Supp. 3d 1289

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2017 | Docket: 64315802

Cited 1 times | Published

a violation of neither section 560.204 nor section 817.41 could possibly constitute a per se violation

Phelps v. Hormel Foods Corp.

244 F. Supp. 3d 1312, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45598

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2017 | Docket: 64313489

Cited 1 times | Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat.' § 817.41; (4) breach of express warranty; and (5) unjust

BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, INC. v. Haines

69 So. 3d 1090, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169, 2011 WL 4435805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 2359435

Cited 1 times | Published

constituted false and misleading advertising under section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1997). Defendants argue

Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In Re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC)

436 B.R. 179, 2010 WL 3359527

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2010 | Docket: 2065157

Cited 1 times | Published

DCA 2006) (finding misleading advertising [under § 817.41] is a particularized form of fraud requiring plaintiffs

Rollins, Inc. v. Butland

932 So. 2d 1172, 2006 WL 1791705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 2451695

Cited 1 times | Published

public of the State of Florida in violation of section 817.41(1), Florida Statutes. For the redress of this

Kaser v. Swann

141 F.R.D. 337, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16028, 1991 WL 323438

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1991 | Docket: 66306578

Cited 1 times | Published

unregistered dealer, violation of Florida Statute § 817.41 (1989) for misleading advertising, and breach

Foxfire Inn of Stuart, Florida, Inc. v. Neff

433 So. 2d 1304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1983 | Docket: 1727434

Cited 1 times | Published

disclose material evidence," in violation of Section 817.41, Florida Statutes; had made certain entries

Brown v. Gardens by the Sea South Condominium Ass'n

424 So. 2d 181, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1983 | Docket: 64594410

Cited 1 times | Published

to attorneys fees in an action brought under Section 817.41(6), Florida Statutes (1979) and Ocala Music

Paul Turner v. Costa Crociere S.P.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 19, 2021 | Docket: 60217515

Published

claim for misleading advertising under Fla. Stat. § 817.41. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss

Sun 'N Lake of Sebring Improvement Dist. v. Ayala

247 So. 3d 572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2018 | Docket: 64682304

Published

arising under part II of chapter 501 ... and section 817.41 ... respectively. Neither of those statutes

Deer Valley Realty, Inc. v. SB Hotel Associates, LLC

190 So. 3d 203, 2016 WL 1660619, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2016 | Docket: 3062298

Published

based on separate proposals for settlement and section 817.41(6), Florida Statutes (2014). We affirm the

Anna Maria Curcio v. State of Florida Department etc.

164 So. 3d 750

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2015 | Docket: 2659818

Published

(unfair and deceptive trade practices) and section 817.41 (misleading advertising), respectively. Neither

Bioclin BV v. Multygyn USA, LLC

72 F. Supp. 3d 1288, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174135, 2014 WL 7224720

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 64299450

Published

Fraud Act for misleading advertising, Fla. Stat. § 817.41; and asserting a common law claim for unjust enrichment

Black Diamond Properties, Inc. v. Haines

90 So. 3d 851, 2012 WL 1885909, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2012 | Docket: 60309661

Published

Brenda Masut, Tom Howell, and Richard Conboy. See § 817.41(6), Fla. Stat. (1997). The award was based on

Knights Armament Co. v. Omnitech Partners

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 2, 2011 | Docket: 529987

Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41 (Count V); (6) common law unfair competition

Nelson v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.

270 F.R.D. 689, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117098, 2010 WL 4282106

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2010 | Docket: 66043393

Published

and Misleading Advertising in violation of section 817.41, Florida Statutes; and 3) Unjust Enrichment

Baby Buddies, Inc. v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 22, 2010 | Docket: 2907085

Published

II alleged that Toys R Us violated Fla. Stat. § 817.41, which prohibits misleading advertising, by claiming

Star-Brite Distributing, Inc. v. Kop-Coat, Inc.

664 F. Supp. 2d 1246, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103911

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2009 | Docket: 2345686

Published

Florida's false advertising statute, Fla. Stat. § 817.41 (Count III), and a claim for common law unfair

Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc.

647 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73605, 2009 WL 2579278

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 2247167

Published

misleading advertising in violation of Fla. Stat. § 817.41 (Count V); (6) common law unfair competition (Count

Kemin Foods, L.C. v. OmniActive Health Technologies, Inc.

654 F. Supp. 2d 1328, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69447, 2009 WL 2365850

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2009 | Docket: 2381504

Published

(count three), violation of Florida Statute Section 817.41, which criminalizes false advertising (count

Kemin Foods, L.C. v. OmniActive Health Technologies, Inc.

654 F. Supp. 2d 1328, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69447, 2009 WL 2365850

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2009 | Docket: 2381504

Published

(count three), violation of Florida Statute Section 817.41, which criminalizes false advertising (count

Sunset Harbour North Condo. Assoc. v. Bedzow

842 So. 2d 200, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 2003 WL 1720387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2003 | Docket: 64821978

Published

responsible for it. The Association relies upon section 817.41(4), Florida Statutes (1997), which provides

Frehling v. International Select

192 F.3d 1330

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 1999 | Docket: 1353275

Published

Stat. ch. 501, false advertising under Fla. Stat. § 817.41, unfair competition under Florida common law,

Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc.

184 F.3d 1292

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 17, 1999 | Docket: 395464

Published

, and misleading advertising, see Fla. Stat. § 817.41. Both statutory causes of action authorize a

Frehling Enterprises, Inc. v. International Select Group, Inc.

994 F. Supp. 1443, 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1750, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22209, 1997 WL 817343

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1997 | Docket: 66021634

Published

a Frehling employee. B. Count IV: Fla. Stat. § 817.41 Misleading Or False Advertising In order to prove

Judge v. American Motors Corp.

908 F.2d 1565, 1990 WL 110118

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 21, 1990 | Docket: 66255572

Published

with the CJ-7 model vehicle. See Fla. Stat.Ann. § 817.41 (West 1977). The district court held that the

Norton Tire Co. v. Tire Kingdom Co.

858 F.2d 1533, 1988 WL 106037

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 1, 1988 | Docket: 66238484

Published

Practices Act, Fla.Stat. § 501.201-.213 (1987); id. § 817.41 (Misleading Advertising); id. § 817.44 (Intentional

Whiteside v. Joseph Harris Co.

491 So. 2d 1215, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1585, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1986 | Docket: 64620811

Published

plaintiffs below. Plaintiffs brought suit under section 817.41, Florida Statutes (1985), charging defendant

State v. Bubsey

427 So. 2d 358, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1983 | Docket: 64595302

Published

particular violation under Section 817.06 and Section 817.-41(1), Florida Statutes (1979).