Florida Statute 825.104 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 825
ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION OF ELDERLY PERSONS AND DISABLED ADULTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 825.104

825.104 Knowledge of victim’s age.—It does not constitute a defense to a prosecution for any violation of this chapter that the accused did not know the age of the victim.

History.—s. 5, ch. 95-158.

F.S. 825.104 on Google Scholar

F.S. 825.104 on CourtListener

Amendments to 825.104

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 825.104

Total Results: 7

David L. Morrison v. Magic Carpet Aviation

383 F.3d 1253, 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1569, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18908, 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,789, 2004 WL 1970052

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 8, 2004 | Docket: 398132

Cited 23 times | Published

common ownership/financial control.” 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(2). Morrison fails to introduce any evidence

Cruz-Lovo v. Ryder System, Inc.

298 F. Supp. 2d 1248, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23749, 2003 WL 23126222

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 2429439

Cited 5 times | Published

employer for purposes of the FMLA. See 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(1). According to Plaintiff, if Ryder and Credit

Jean Bernard Gelin v. U.S. Attorney General

837 F.3d 1236, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17296, 2016 WL 5219863

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 22, 2016 | Docket: 4424360

Cited 4 times | Published

the victim’s age is not a defense. Fla. Stat. § 825.104. And the jury instructions do not require the

Morrison v. Amway Corp.

336 F. Supp. 2d 1193, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25928, 2003 WL 23784535

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2003 | Docket: 2389697

Cited 2 times | Published

ownership/financial control." Id. (citing 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(2)). While each of these factors is to be considered

Wascura v. City of South Miami

169 F.3d 683, 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 265, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3637, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,786, 1999 WL 123644

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 9, 1999 | Docket: 395180

Cited 2 times | Published

counterpart in the FLSA. Specifically, 29 C.F.R. § 825.104, which addresses the issue of “[w]hat employers

Tristan Tanner v. Stryker Corporation of Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 20, 2024 | Docket: 67664280

Published

Argued: May 17, 2024

reach and scope is limited. See, e.g., 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(a) (excepting from FMLA altogether almost

Wascura v. City of South Miami

169 F.3d 683

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 9, 1999 | Docket: 1118704

Published

counterpart in the FLSA. Specifically, 29 C.F.R. § 825.104, which addresses the