825.106
Criminal actions involving elderly persons or disabled adults; speedy trial.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
825.106 Criminal actions involving elderly persons or disabled adults; speedy trial.—In a criminal action in which an elderly person or disabled adult is a victim, the state may move the court to advance the trial on the docket. The presiding judge, after consideration of the age and health of the victim, may advance the trial on the docket. The motion may be filed and served with the information or charges or at any time thereafter.
History.—s. 7, ch. 95-158.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Mahoney v. Nokia, Inc.
Mahoney v. Nokia, Inc. (2006)
“106 (“Section 825.106”), which addresses “joint employment,” as follows: “[wjhere two or more businesses exercise some control over the work or working conditions of the employee, the businesses may be joint employers under FMLA.”
Cruz-Lovo v. Ryder System, Inc. (2003)
“However, in situations such as the instant case, the regulations provide that the two entities will be viewed as a single employer of an employee provided they meet either the " 'joint employment' test discussed in § 825.”
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190 (2025)
“On motion by the state and in accordance with section 825.106, Florida Statutes, the court must consider advancing a case on the trial docket if the alleged victim is an elderly person or a disabled adult.”
— 825.106(a) — 1 case
Cruz-Lovo v. Ryder System, Inc. (2003)
“However, in situations such as the instant case, the regulations provide that the two entities will be viewed as a single employer of an employee provided they meet either the " 'joint employment' test discussed in § 825.”
— 825.106(c) — 1 case
Mahoney v. Nokia, Inc. (2006)
“106 (“Section 825.106”), which addresses “joint employment,” as follows: “[wjhere two or more businesses exercise some control over the work or working conditions of the employee, the businesses may be joint employers under FMLA.”
— 825.106(e) — 1 case
Mahoney v. Nokia, Inc. (2006)
“106 (“Section 825.106”), which addresses “joint employment,” as follows: “[wjhere two or more businesses exercise some control over the work or working conditions of the employee, the businesses may be joint employers under FMLA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.